Machine tests v Real People

[gumpy]

Hi Everyone,

A couple of months back we had a nice ball test by Golf Magazine.

I was wondering if anyone had experiances where your results were completely different to what they reported. Many people say that one should not think too long and hard about the figures they report unless you swing the exact same way as the machine and I was wondering if this was true.

2ndly, can someone pls post the 105 ss distance for the e5+, nxt tour, gamer, tp burner and hot bite? I'm in Australia and I can't get a copy of the magazine and I am considering experimenting with the above balls.

thanks in advance,

[larlev]

Sorry there was only a 105ss for 6 balls.

Just 90mph..do you still want the results?

[gumpy]

Oh ok that's fine,

Did you find the results accurate to you?

[larlev]

Oh ok that's fine,

All things considered...they are all decent in length. Around the greens they differ greatly, that's what I got from it.

90mph, 137mph ball speed, 13.75 launch, 2900rpm Longest....Nike PD Soft 259.9 (pro-v 249.0) Shortest....Nike One Platinum 239.0 Most balls were in the 249-257 range....so difference is slight