Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6483 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I am getting back into the sport. I plan on taking lessons to help my game (i really don't have one). I currently have a set of 15 year old irons (Ping Zing knock offs). I want to spend less than $500 for the irons. I'm guessing that I should start out with the super game improvement level? Would that be correct? I plan on playing no more than twice month.

My questions are this. Should I take some lessons, play a few rounds, and go to the range with my current set of clubs? Or should I test out some new clubs and buy now? I have never been able to hit my old clubs very well at all and am I'm thinking the new clubs could help out during my lessons? Any advice would be great. I plan on buying drivers down the road once I'm hitting the ball straight, etc.

Also, regarding getting clubs fitted. Is that something that is important for someone like myself. How could I get fitted, if I don't have a consistent swing yet?


I'm considering the following Irons:

Callaway Big Bertha or X-18

Nike - Sling Shot OSS

Cobra SP or FP

Adams a2OS

Posted
I would suggest Callaway Big Bertha Irons. Those were the first clubs I used and was not upset with them. New 08' Models are around $599, I believe.

Any local pro shop should be able to fit you aswell. I used the Ping fitting system and they transferred that over to my taylormade irons, but if your swing is not consistent enough I wouldnt suggest getting fitted. Unless your 7 feet tall, I would play standard set-up and learn to adapt my swing to the clubs.
In My Bridgestone Stand Bag:

Driver: TM r7 425 TP (8.5*) Stiff
Wood: TM Ti 5 Wood (18*) Stiff
Irons: TM r7 TP Irons (3-PW) RegularGW LW: TM rac Satin TPs ( 52* 56* 60*)Putter: TM Rossa Monza Spider Balls: Bridgestone B330s

Posted
So if I do get fitted, what will they tell me? Will it just be the length of the club and the lie? (I'm 5'10").

When I get fitted and buy the clubs, do they charge additional to change the lie? In other words, if I buy Big Bertha's ($599) - do I pay an additional fee for them to change the length and/or lie?

Posted
So if I do get fitted, what will they tell me? Will it just be the length of the club and the lie? (I'm 5'10").

For me it was an extra 20 bucks. Which isnt bad considering how much it helped my ball flight when they changed it from standard.

In My Bridgestone Stand Bag:

Driver: TM r7 425 TP (8.5*) Stiff
Wood: TM Ti 5 Wood (18*) Stiff
Irons: TM r7 TP Irons (3-PW) RegularGW LW: TM rac Satin TPs ( 52* 56* 60*)Putter: TM Rossa Monza Spider Balls: Bridgestone B330s

Posted

First off, if you you only plan on playing twice a month and your handicap is the max, I wouldn't worry so much about getting new clubs unless you are incredibly tall or short and your clubs are upright or flat in the wrong direction. Concerning lessons, I always think it's the best idea for beginners. But if you are only going to play twice per month, it's hard to groove any kind of consistent muscle memory and get your money's worth. I honestly think that only playing twice per month is your biggest obstacle.
My advice to you: Quit your job and reprioritize your life to dedicate time to what's really important.....Golf and improving your game. Any monetary or social success you might gain through your job pales in comparison to the satisfaction of consistently hitting crisp iron shots time after time.

In my Vantage bag:
Driver::905R 8.5*(V2)
3 Wood:Launcher 13*(V2)
Irons:AP2 (Project X 5.5) (3-W)
HybridTWS 19*Gap wedge:CG15 50* Sand wedge:CG15 56*Putter:: XG9 (35")Ball:ProV1X

Posted
I have to disagree w/ adapting your swing to the clubs...that's just bad adv ice.

I would at the very least get a static fit done, this is basically a measurement of you wrist to floor length w/ shoes on. It wll determine roughly if the length is correct. If you measure I can get you many websites that have charts.

As far as new clubs...I believe that anyone can hit any club as long as they have a fundamentally good swing. Keep taking lessons for awhile, and then start looking at new clubs. Ping Zings were some of Pings best clubs made, so your clones should perform somewhat similar.

I play Adams Tech OS..picked them up new on e-bay for $275. A2OS can be had for around that price also, and are really nice clubs.

It really comes down to what fits your eye the best, every club you mentioned is equally good, so pick which one you like and go for it.

Forget the notion that SGI, GI clubs are going to hamper your progress, it's BS. You can play these clubs for many, many years and enjoy the game.

The main thing is the lessons..you are doing the right thing by taking them. You will know so much more about your swing at a later time when you become more proficient in your swing, then you can know what type of club you are after.

Hope this helps..........

Posted
I'd keep your current irons and see how much you do end up playing. If you only play once or twice a month your current irons will probably be sufficient. If you catch the golf bug you'll know when it's time for an equipment update. No reason spending lots of $$$ for something you are not sure that you'll take up seriously.

G15 9* w/Aldila Serrano 63S
FT 4 wood w/ Aldila NVS 75S
i15 20* hybrid w/UST Mamiya Avix Core Tour Red 84S
4-PW MP-57 w/ True Temper Dynamic Gold S300 (+0.5")
52, 56 and 60 degree MP-10 Satin w/ True Temper Dynamic Gold Wedge FlexStudio Stock #4, BB25, Fastback 1.5 or Backstryke Blade..... @ 34"P...


Posted
Thanks for all the advice. During my lessons - I will ask the pro if I should have any concerns with my current clubs. I'm a little concerned that they are not the right fit, etc for me at this point. I will take some lessons, hit the range and course a few times and decide from there if it makes since to buy new clubs or not. I was just thinking that it might make since to get some decent clubs and the lessons at the same time - that way the pro can work with me on a set that might last me another 5 or 6 years.

Posted
Thanks for all the advice. During my lessons - I will ask the pro if I should have any concerns with my current clubs. I'm a little concerned that they are not the right fit, etc for me at this point. I will take some lessons, hit the range and course a few times and decide from there if it makes since to buy new clubs or not. I was just thinking that it might make since to get some decent clubs and the lessons at the same time - that way the pro can work with me on a set that might last me another 5 or 6 years.

I gave you good advice..........now I'll give you what I would do.....

I would buy new clubs, that's just me. If you have the money treat yourself to something nice, we work hard to enjoy nice things, even if I played 2-3mth. I would buy new clubs. I firmly believe if your not confident in your equipment you won't succeed, that goes for everything in life as far as I'm concerned.

Posted
Larlev - I appreciate the advice and will follow it. I agree I think it does make since to buy new clubs and start off on a new foot. By the way, when you bought your clubs on e-bay did you get the custom fit afterwords or did you search for clubs that met your specs?

Once again thanks for your comments.

Posted
Larlev - I appreciate the advice and will follow it. I agree I think it does make since to buy new clubs and start off on a new foot. By the way, when you bought your clubs on e-bay did you get the custom fit afterwords or did you search for clubs that met your specs?

I knew I needed 1/2" longer shafts than standard before I made my purchase, so I did look at the stock length on the clubs I had narrowed down. This isn't 100% why I bought the Adams, but was definetly in my mind. I also had the lofts and lie checked, this also just happened to be right from the factory....I was lucky I guess.

I did regrip though...I needed a midsize due to hand size. I will admit paying $275 for a $699 set of irons was really a no-brainer for me. ...it keeps the wife somewhat happier when she thinks I get great deals on stuff...LOL Let us know what you end up buying....

Note: This thread is 6483 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.