Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6426 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I had started having issues with my previous set of irons (Wilson Fat Shaft III graphite with Hybrid 3-4) in that I could not control distances with them and needed something a bit more predictable. I could hit them solid, but by trying to adjust my swing for the gaps between clubs, I was hitting all over the place. I had problems feeling comfortable with the clubs and I did not like the light weight of the graphite shafts.

This spring I went to a demo day and tried out a whole bunch of irons, but finally settled on some Taylormade R7 Draw irons. At the demo, I was absolutely crushing these clubs and had very few mis-hits. I had them fitted with stiff steel shafts, and when trying them out at first I had very repeatable distances with each club with no big gaps.

After spending a few months with these clubs, I think I made a mistake in buying them. Ever since the demo day, I have had nothing but problems getting good solid contact with these clubs and my game has suffered tremendously. My game already is not that good, so I cannot afford to have it suffer any more.

I am thinking of either selling or trading in the clubs now and going to something different. I recently played a round with my old clubs and was able to hit them a lot more solid, but still have no distance control with them and still just not feeling comfortable with them.

I am not a good golfer by any means, but until now have never had a problem getting the ball in the air. I wonder if maybe the offset of the clubs is throwing me off. I don't know, but I do know I just don't think they are right for me.

Any suggestions? The other clubs I hit well at the demo day were the Adam's A3 and the Cleveland CG Gold, but thta does not seem to mean anything considering how well I hit the TM's. I am looking for something that is forgiving.

All help is appreciated. Thanks.

Posted
FWIW - what changed from the demo day to now? I am guessing it isn't the clubs. I would spend a little $$ with a lesson and see if he/she can notice something in your swing that you may be doing now that isn't helping your confidence with the clubs. How many rounds on the new sticks?

Andrew


Posted
I don't think anything has changed swing-wise, especially since I am still getting the exact same kind of contact I used to get when I go back to my old clubs. I have played 10 rounds on the new ones, and played Saturday with my old clubs.

I am seriously considering taking a few lessons and maybe that would help with the new clubs, but you have to understand how dramatic the difference in contact and consistency is between my old and new clubs.

Posted
If you think the offset is bothering you then cross off the CG Golds from your wish list. They carry a 1/2 inch offset. The CG Reds are only 1/4 inch offset.

I never had a game improvement iron but I liked the way the golds felt. So I demo-ed them and found out I didnt really like them. They were too buttery even on off center hits.

The one thing any golfer needs for improvement is feedback. A Game Improvement Iron wont give that to you in my opinion.

13 Wedges
1 Putter


Note: This thread is 6426 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have a couple of trips planned, although golf was a secondary component in each.  In February we're going to visit some friends near Naples, so Mary Anne and I have added on a few days to stay and play at Streamsong.  Then In March we're going to Hawaii (again), and will almost certainly get in a few rounds there.
    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.