Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6364 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
A couple of people said it was "do-able". That doesn't mean it would be likely or a regular occurrence, but it could happen. I'm sitting at 22.4 right now and I shot an 82 in a club tourney last weekend (I then turned around on the second day and shot 96).

Posted
Those of you that keep saying a 79 is reasonable for a 13 must not understand statistics. Oh well.

I like that restricted rule. That is something I would like our tour to use.

I even understand stats too. I also understand what I have actually witnessed in person even more than I understand stats.

WITB:
Driver-B'stone J33R 9.5* Pro Force V2 65S 44.5"
3w/5w-B'stone J33R 15-18* NV75 Stiff
3h Ping G10 21* TFC Stiff
irons-Mizuno Pro II w/4-9, MP-T 47 PW, currently have DG S300. X100 Soft Stepped 1x or PX 6.0 are on stand by.GW Mizuno MP-T 53-9* DG R300LW Titleist Vokey SM 58-12* DG Wedge flexT...


Posted
You can spot an sandbagger when he hits a driver off the fairway or they have a sun tan and carries a 2 iron.

Titleist 910 D2 9.5 Driver
Titleist 910 F15 & 21 degree fairway wood
Titleist 910 hybrid 24 degree
Mizuno Mp33 5 - PW
52/1056/1160/5

"Yonex ADX Blade putter, odyssey two ball blade putter, both  33"

ProV-1


Posted
Those of you that keep saying a 79 is reasonable for a 13 must not understand statistics. Oh well.

I have a PhD in statistics (seriously). And it's quite possible.

First, 13 is a snapshot of the last 20 rounds. If the guy is trending better, it's quite reasonable -- his handicap dropping rapidly is proof of that. I'm not saying this particular is not a sandbagger. I am saying that 79 is possible. I'm a 14 handicap. I shot a back nine 39 last Thursday. Am I a sandbagger (I shot 46 on the front)?
A couple of people said it was "do-able". That doesn't mean it would be likely or a regular occurrence, but it could happen. I'm sitting at 22.4 right now and I shot an 82 in a club tourney last weekend (I then turned around on the second day and shot 96).

Exactly. It's rare, but is happens. Across the whole country, there are thousands of 13s. A few every summer will put up rounds of 79.


Posted
I think I might have played with one today. He plays at a 13 handicap and dropped a 79 in the first day of a tournament on a course he said he has not played in a long time.

Can you tell us the par, course rating or slope?

For example, on a par 72, a 13 handicap is shooting -6. http://www.popeofslope.com/sandbagging/odds.html This shows that there is a 1:323 chance of that happening for any particular golfer, those are far from long odds. Assuming there are a bunch of golfers in the event the odds that anyone beats their handicap by 6 strokes or more become much shorter. For example, if you have 50 13-handicaps, the probability that at least one shots 79 or better is 14% [1- (322/323)^50 = 0.14]. Most people don't understand that odds for an individual doing something rare vs. the odds of someone (anyone) doing it are quite different. It's rare that a particular number is drawn in the pick 6 lotto. But someone beats those odds and wins the lotto every few weeks. [But you still shouldn't play the lottery]. So just because you're a 13 and haven't shot 79 doesn't mean it's impossible when someone else does.

Posted
Par: 72
Rating: 71.8
Slope: 131

Interesting #'s.

Remember

Day one: 79
Day two: 80.

His index history was trending from an 8.9 in March 07 to an 11.1 when he played. Scores in June & July (84, 80, 79, 93, 90, 89, 94, 91, 77, 86, 91, 84, 88, 86, 89). I know some of those aren't used to calculate his handicap but he was tossing in 94's on a course with a slope of 116.

In my bag:

Driver: Cleveland Hibore XL 9.5*
Hybrids: Cleveland HiBore 19*
Nike Slingshot 23*Irons: Titleist 775 CBWedges: Titleist Vokey 54.10 Callaway X-Tour 58.12


Note: This thread is 6364 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.