Advertisement
Advertisement
iacas

The Films and Movies Thread

1,400 posts in this topic

This thread will be for the discussion of the most recent film/movie you've seen, news or discussion of movies you want to see, etc.

I saw Now You See Me the other day. It was disappointing. Too much suspension of disbelief, and nowhere near enough of the backstory to make you wonder WHY the four people would go along with the whole thing.

We'll enforce a grading scale of eagle, birdie, par, bogey, or double.

I give Now You See Me a bogey.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

This thread will be for the discussion of the most recent film/movie you've seen, news or discussion of movies you want to see, etc.

I saw Now You See Me the other day. It was disappointing. Too much suspension of disbelief, and nowhere near enough of the backstory to make you wonder WHY the four people would go along with the whole thing.

We'll enforce a grading scale of eagle, birdie, par, bogey, or double.

I give Now You See Me a bogey.

Yeah I saw that too. I would call it a double bogey or worse. I knew it was going to be awful after the scene where they go into the apartment and discover there's no power so they can't turn on the lights, next scene they are all walking around the place with flashlights because...everyone...carries flashlights...at all times...in the day...in the city...

:doh:

On a more positive note, I saw Epic with my kids last week and that was great. Best animated film I've seen in quite some time.

I give it a birdie in terms of animated films.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The Numbers Station - A darker version of Grosse Pointe Blank. It's not as action packed as say the Bourne series but not as carefully paced as Tinker Tailor Soildier Spy, but somewhere in between. I'd give it a par but with a birdie chance lip-out. If you like Cusack, you'll probably like this movie, it's on Netflix. If the guy opposite Cusack looks familiar, that's Ser Davos, the Onion Knight from Game of Thrones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On a more positive note, I saw Epic with my kids last week and that was great. Best animated film I've seen in quite some time.

I give it a birdie in terms of animated films.

For whatever reason, I haven't really "seen" this one yet.  What I mean is, we have the DVD, and my son has watched it several times ... even a few where I've been in the room, but I've yet to actually pay close attention.  He and my wife love it though, so I'm sure that it is good.

He is very excited about Cloudy With A Chance Of Meatballs 2, yet my wife is, shall we say, not ... so I will be seeing that one with him.

The last movie I saw in the theater was "Turbo," which was perfectly entertaining for 90 minutes, even if 100% predictable and familiar. I'd give it a par.

Thursday while on an airplane, I watched Hangover 3 (although I missed several parts while attending to the kids) and thought it was decent. Would probably also give that one a par as well.

Really, really can't wait until Thor 2 comes out ... which I think is next month!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

For whatever reason, I haven't really "seen" this one yet.  What I mean is, we have the DVD, and my son has watched it several times ... even a few where I've been in the room, but I've yet to actually pay close attention.  He and my wife love it though, so I'm sure that it is good.

He is very excited about Cloudy With A Chance Of Meatballs 2, yet my wife is, shall we say, not ... so I will be seeing that one with him.

The last movie I saw in the theater was "Turbo," which was perfectly entertaining for 90 minutes, even if 100% predictable and familiar.  I'd give it a par.

Thursday while on an airplane, I watched Hangover 3 (although I missed several parts while attending to the kids) and thought it was decent.  Would probably also give that one a par as well.

Really, really can't wait until Thor 2 comes out ... which I think is next month!!

I've had Epic on my Amazon for a while but I never watched it. My wife saw it with my kids and she said it was good. I'll watch it with the kids eventually.

I also got Iron Man 3 on Amazon and watched it over the weekend. Compared to the first and second movie, this one wasn't as compelling, but it was still a good Marvel movie. I'd give it a birdie.

Saw Star Trek Into Darkness a couple of weeks back and I did like it a little better than the first one but the ending felt a little rushed. I'd give it a birdie as well.

I usually don't go to the movies as much anymore because on my kids are still at the young and rowdy stage and on my free time, I'd rather just go play golf. So most of the new movies, I'll watch it on Amazon since it's released a few weeks before the blu ray comes out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Saw Prisoners during the weekend and would give it an eagle on an easy par 5.  Intense thriller, great performances by Hugh Jackman and Jake Gyllenhaal with a little twist at the end.  Has some Breaking Bad-esque qualities where you might be asking yourself how far  you would go if you were put in this position.  Not the movie to go see if you want a light hearted date night ;-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I finally saw World War Z off iTunes the other day, and it was horrible. Zombies are pretty "played out" at this point, and the genre didn't get any help when they released this load of steamy poo. The movie was nothing like the book... aside from the fact that zombies were present. I've said many times that WWZ could only work as a television series given the short storied nature of the novel, but of course, it was turned into a vehicle for Brad Pitt instead. Yikes.

I knew the movie would be bad as soon as I learned who Pitt's character was and that it would be featured heavily... in the first few pages of the novel, his character insists that "his own backstory would not cloud the more important story of what happened to the world at large," or something to that effect. Instead, the movie violated this rule right from the beginning, only concerning itself with Pitt's character and his family. From the beginning, those who read the novel are pretty much told to go eat a dick.

Some of what made the novel so good is that the United States knew the zombies were coming -- the virus originates in China -- and yet cannot do anything to stop it despite months of preparation. In the movie, Americans are all surprised when zombies start popping up -- a classic (and now bad) zombie cliche -- and now even more of the originality of the novel has been stripped away and shat on.

The epidemic supposedly begins with one person whose origins are unknown in the novel. The world has its chances to nip it in the bud, but fails over and over again to take the proper action. Even when it reaches a larger scale and nations get involved in putting their heads together to stop it, the bureaucracies cannot agree on how to proceed, and the epidemic just continues to get worse. There were so many brilliant jabs at our own society in the book that the film just decided to flush down the toilet.

I feel like Hollywood just told me I'm too stupid to understand a zombie film with legitimate political implications to it. Thanks.

They ruined a story with promise.

WWZ gets a big fat double , and I'd give it a snowman if that was part of the rules of the thread.

It's movies like this that make me happy we at least live in the golden age of cable television. I never have to go to the movies anymore!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I finally saw World War Z off iTunes the other day, and it was horrible. Zombies are pretty "played out" at this point, and the genre didn't get any help when they released this load of steamy poo. The movie was nothing like the book... aside from the fact that zombies were present. I've said many times that WWZ could only work as a television series given the short storied nature of the novel, but of course, it was turned into a vehicle for Brad Pitt instead. Yikes.  I knew the movie would be bad as soon as I learned who Pitt's character was and that it would be featured heavily... in the first few pages of the novel, his character insists that "his own backstory would not cloud the more important story of what happened to the world at large," or something to that effect. Instead, the movie violated this rule right from the beginning, only concerning itself with Pitt's character and his family. From the beginning, those who read the novel are pretty much told to go eat a dick.  Some of what made the novel so good is that the United States knew the zombies were coming -- the virus originates in China -- and yet cannot do anything to stop it despite months of preparation. In the movie, Americans are all surprised when zombies start popping up -- a classic (and now bad) zombie cliche -- and now even more of the originality of the novel has been stripped away and shat on.  The epidemic supposedly begins with one person whose origins are unknown in the novel. The world has its chances to nip it in the bud, but fails over and over again to take the proper action. Even when it reaches a larger scale and nations get involved in putting their heads together to stop it, the bureaucracies cannot agree on how to proceed, and the epidemic just continues to get worse. There were so many brilliant jabs at our own society in the book that the film just decided to flush down the toilet. I feel like Hollywood just told me I'm too stupid to understand a zombie film with legitimate political implications to it. Thanks.  They ruined a story with promise. WWZ gets a big fat double , and I'd give it a snowman if that was part of the rules of the thread.  It's movies like this that make me happy we at least live in the golden age of cable television. I never have to go to the movies anymore!

I've heard a lot of similar reviews. Too bad, you'd think it would be easy to make a good zombie movie (or Family Guy) but this sounds like it's just a big stink fest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I've heard a lot of similar reviews. Too bad, you'd think it would be easy to make a good zombie movie (or Family Guy) but this sounds like it's just a big stink fest.

I read and loved the book and still enjoyed the movie - I wasn't expecting the it to be anything like the book and I agree, a long form serial format would serve the book better.

There were some very good movies this year - Before Midnight, Mud, Stoker, Fruitvale Station. And there's Gravity to come. And 12 Years a Slave. And Momuments Men.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Clear History , starring Larry David was good (par).  I'm not a big Larry David fan, but it was funny.  They did a great job with the extras having authentic Mass accents.  Lenny Clark, Jimmy Tingle and Patty Ross, who plays Gladys, were great.

Now You See Me had its moments, but my wife could not stay awake.

As for Tinker, Tailor, Soldier Spy , ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.  Triple bogey for boredom and dialog that was in the "low talker" range.  I couldn't make it through half the movie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Last night, I watched The Looper . I thought the concept of the movie was cool, but I think they could have done it a lot better. It was kind of slow at times. I'd give it a bogey.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As for Tinker, Tailor, Soldier Spy, ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.  Triple bogey for boredom and dialog that was in the "low talker" range.  I couldn't make it through half the movie.

I would give TTSS a tap-in birdie. The movie had so many good actors - Oldman, Cumberbatch, Tom Hardy, Ciaran Hinds, John Hurt. It's a movie that gets better and better with repeated viewings.

I can see why people find it boring though, it's very deliberately placed, the plot is very hard to follow, even when it was a 5 hour mini-series with Sir Alec Guiness.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I finally saw World War Z off iTunes the other day, and it was horrible. Zombies are pretty "played out" at this point, and the genre didn't get any help when they released this load of steamy poo. The movie was nothing like the book... aside from the fact that zombies were present.

I heard an interview with the author in which he was asked whether it bothered him that they changed so much from the book. His response was something along the lines of, "Not really - they changed so much that it's pretty much an entirely different story, so they can't even be compared."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember years ago Sandra Bullock said she didn't care at all about awards, and she did movies because it was fun, and so she mostly did comedies and kept things light and didn't care about serious roles or "competing" and so on. It was fine - I admired her for being honest about it and, duh, she was making millions of dollars, so you can't fault her for it.

Then she did The Blind Side , and now this.

So while I didn't blame her before, I'm glad she's changed her mind. Undoubtedly it's still "fun" for her, but it's good to see her taking on more challenges and more serious roles.

P.S. I think I typed something like this years ago, somewhere on this forum. Maybe it was elsewhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I give Gravity a chip in from 30 yards eagle.

This is not spoilery - there is a movie within a movie, a story within a story folks. On the surface, it's Space ... yo, but if you dig deeper into the dialogue, symbolism and imagery, there's a message in there that depending on your life beliefs, can be very moving.

Bullock made two amazing career decisions this year with Heat (so funny) and Gravity. I think she fits the role better than Jolie, Johanssen, Lively or Cotillard would have.

Will see it again in the theaters soon. This is not a movie you watch on your flat panel, even if it is 80 inches.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I give Gravity a chip in from 30 yards eagle.

This is not spoilery - there is a movie within a movie, a story within a story folks. On the surface, it's Space... yo, but if you dig deeper into the dialogue, symbolism and imagery, there's a message in there that depending on your life beliefs, can be very moving.

Bullock made two amazing career decisions this year with Heat (so funny) and Gravity. I think she fits the role better than Jolie, Johanssen, Lively or Cotillard would have.

Will see it again in the theaters soon. This is not a movie you watch on your flat panel, even if it is 80 inches.

Going to see it in IMAX 3D tonight, looking forward to it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Because everyone gets bored of blue skies now and again! Crazy winds and serious mood-lighting! First hole has the signature lighthouse behind the green and a great linksy fairway, second is a 114 yard par three that played about 140 yesterday.  
    • A good afternoon of birthday practice yesterday. Did a lot of short game work and went out to the course way after the last tee time to put them in practice in 'real' situations. Finally I did a nice putting drill to gauge areas to focus on - this will be a bit of a regular thing that I go back to now and again to judge progress. A few photos from on-course work: Downwind - 15mph and dispersion from shots at 125 yards, 115, 100 and 75. Nearly pulled the wedge from 75 into a bunker, which would have been horrendous, so that's a bit worse than it looks. Delighted with the rest and all on the middle tier of a three tier green. After about 10 minutes of practising, from 50 yards using a variety of clubs (furthest to nearest) - putter, wedge, hybrid chip. Had to come up a big tier, so pretty pleased with this. Hybrid chip was the right play in that it took the tier out of play, but my default would have always been wedge. Just nice to add another shot to my game - although it will need more practice. Putting: Just need to make more inside 10 feet. Great not to have any 3 putts though! Hole Ft Break Score 1 Score 2 Score 3 Score 4 Score 5 1.         3ft Straight 1         2.         6ft R/L uphill 1         3.         9ft L/R downhill 2         4.         12ft R/L downhill 2         5.         15ft L/R 2         6.         4ft slight break downhill 1         7.         8ft R/L 2         8.         12ft L/R 2         9.         16ft L/R downhill 2         10.     20ft L/R uphill 2         11.     5ft slight break 2         12.     10ft L/R 2         13.     15ft R/L 2         14.     20ft Straightish 1         15.     25ft Double Break 2         16.     6ft R/L downhill 2         17.     33ft Slight uphill 2         18.     45ft Slight downhill 2         Total 32         Strokes Gained -2.81        
    • 26/2/17 - more slow takeaway work. Heading to the range later and will spend time really working on transitioning this work to full swing. I think the feel needs to be that my left arm is glued to my stomach, but will check with video later.
    • Thank you! Got out for a few holes so it was a good day in spite of work!
    • 2/25: Played two rounds today with dad at a different course than usual. Shot 96 and 93. A few nice strings of pars and made several amazing putts (). Mostly bogeys other than that but managed a couple of absolute blow-up holes in each round that helped to guarantee 90+ scores from an otherwise very nice day of golf. I could complain about "sand-traps" sans-a-single-spec-of-sand with 10-foot wide puddles in them, or mushy fairways, or waiting 5-minutes for the 4-some in front of you on every shot, but there wasn't a notes field on the scorecard.  Practice is paying off, though. Hit my drives farther than ever, draws when I wanted them, and the fade didn't let me down when I needed it. 3/4 "flighted" shots are the new go-to approach of choice all the way out to 160+ with my 3-iron, and (n)GIRs have jumped up considerably. I've rambled on about my short-game improvements before, but it continues. Holed a pitch shot from about 10 yards and stopped 2 others 6 inches from the pin. Gotta play some more rounds from the front so I get used to stringing pars together. Realized today that I don't just get nervous about it, I also get cocky. Weird combination. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Catcher20
      Catcher20
      (27 years old)
    2. JD15
      JD15
      (52 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon