Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6346 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I've been playing with callaway fusion's right off the rack for 3 seasons. I'm 5'11 with about a 34" wrist to floor measurment. According to the callaway chart, I'm ok at playing standard clubs.

I don't have much of a problem connecting with the ball. But if I were to get fitted. Can they fit my current clubs to me. Or do you have to buy new clubs after a fitting. From what i've been reading, clubs need to be purchased after the fitting is done.

I do suppose I could get my swing speed checked, etc.

M@

454 RCH 65w FIRM 10deg ti
Fusion 3 Wood
Fusion Irons
SpinMilled 52,56,60
Detour


Posted
If the Fusions are still in the Callaway cart, then you can fit the old clubs just as well as the new ones. Your best bet is to take your current 7 iron with you and see how your impact marks line up. Try a stiffer flex shaft and see how those results are, but if you're making good contact and seeing good results, you're probably fine.

I threw my clubs into the lake so it's time to start over...

Driver: Great Big Bertha II 10°, Callaway System 60 Firm
Woods: Tour 2400 Plus 3
Hybrid: 19.0° 503 H, Adila NV 85 SIrons: X20 4-GWPutter: Studio Select Newport 2


Posted
If the Fusions are still in the Callaway cart, then you can fit the old clubs just as well as the new ones. Your best bet is to take your current 7 iron with you and see how your impact marks line up. Try a stiffer flex shaft and see how those results are, but if you're making good contact and seeing good results, you're probably fine.

How would I find out if mine are still in the Callaway cart? They are the first year of the Fusion irons.

454 RCH 65w FIRM 10deg ti
Fusion 3 Wood
Fusion Irons
SpinMilled 52,56,60
Detour


Posted
On a related note, any tips on how to get the most out of a fitting? Is it bad to get fitted for clubs and then make changes to your swing? If I'm taking lessons to help me find my best swing, do I need to wait until the tweaks to my swing have stabilized before I'll get the most benefit from custom-fitted clubs? Or am I okay as long as my physical dimensions aren't changing? Thanks.

-Andrew

Posted
IMO a fitting is more based upon your size/height, flexibility, natural swing tendencies, and strength. A fitting will focus on shaft (both flex and material), head style ( game improvement or more of a players club), and then fine tuned to lie angle. Standard / flat / upright.

Ping has a pretty good static fitting online that you can start with to see if you are way out of standard. Are you really tall? Long torso? short legs? long arms? To try and answer your latest question - it should not matter to much if you are still working on your game. The fitting professional should be able to tell you if your swing OK or if you have some real bad tendencies that need to be corrected. Depending on where you have them fit, you might have a teaching pro giving you the fitting. I have seen quite a few shops that might charge you $50 or so for the fitting and will let you put this towards a set if you order it thru them. It should take 30-60 minutes to get it done.
good luck.

Cobra L5V - Just waiting for the ZL to have a lower price
Cobra F Speed 2006 3 wood - very underrated 3 wood
Adams Pro Idea 3H and 4H

Taylormade Burner XD 4-AW
Cleveland 48*, 52*, and 60*

Odyssey F7 2 Ball


Posted
I've been playing with callaway fusion's right off the rack for 3 seasons. I'm 5'11 with about a 34" wrist to floor measurment. According to the callaway chart, I'm ok at playing standard clubs.

Absolutely you can get your current clubs fitted, it's not a bad idea to have your club checked on a regular basis anyways especially if you play a lot. If it's the fitting van then just check with those guys. Some may or may not adjust existing clubs so they may refer you to a repair shop or clubmaker in the area.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 6346 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 22 - 2026-01-11 More mirror work. Back outdoors tomorrow.
    • Day 11, 1/11/26.  Today was putting, along about 6' of carpet, with coins on the ground to keep me cognizant of what I'm doing.  I think this is the at-home drill from LSW. (Ugh, missed two of the last four days -- 1/10 and 1/8)
    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.