Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6296 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
hi - anyone here ever given this product a test> its a slice correction trainer and the online reviews I have read have been fantastic but curious what the sandtrappers think - worth the $$$ did it help create a more inside approach?
thanks in advance

In my bag:
Titleist 910D2 w/Diamana Kaali'Stiff
Titleist 910F w/ Diamana Kaali' Stiff
Titleist 910F Hybrid 19 degree w/ Diamana Kaali' Stiff

Titleist AP1 Irons - TT S300
Titleist Vokey SM 50, 54 & 58 - Titleist Scott Cameron Newport


Posted
hi - anyone here ever given this product a test> its a slice correction trainer and the online reviews I have read have been fantastic but curious what the sandtrappers think - worth the $$$ did it help create a more inside approach?

I have only two training aids that I recommend without hesitation: The Inside Approach and the Boomerang Putting System.

When my swing gets loose, I come over the top. I use an Inside Approach every single time I got to the range and practice my full shots. If I get loose, it shows me. If I'm not loose, there is no harm in using it. You can get it at Target for $25 , instead of golf stores which typically charge $45 or more. The only problem that I have ever had relates to the cushion. It's a "foam rubber" material and it has grain like wood. If you hit it on the side, it absorbs impact well. But if you hit it head-on (which I always do), it splits. Fortunately, you can replace it with foam rubber pipe insulation from a home supply store if you can find the right size. If not, the company that makes the Inside Approach will sell you a new cushion at a very reasonable price.
Note: If you primarily practice at a grass range, you can just stick a broken shaft, long wooden dowel, or fiberglass snow marker in the ground at an angle over the target line. Works exactly the same way the Inside Approach does.
Oh, and on a humorous note, when I was researching it and reading reviews to decide if I wanted to buy it, I read a couple of reviews that gave it bad reviews because "Although it corrected my outside-in swing, it didn't do anything to stop me from hitting the ball with an open club face. So I kept hitting the ball to the right." Some people.

Posted
I took some lessons a few years ago and had an over-the-top problem. The pro had a bunch of gadgets but this was the only one we used. It works great. If you come over the top you hit it. If you come through the inside you don't. It doesn't automatically correct your swing, it just shows you if you are swinging on a more correct path.

One other thing he told me was to set a tee 5-6 inches in front of the ball and at about 1 o'clock to the target line. On the downswing, you should be swinging towards the tee. This doesn't tell you if you came over the top, but it gives you a visual about where to swing to. I will still use this if I feel I am not swinging correctly.

I will judge my rounds much more by the quality of my best shots than the acceptability of my worse ones.


Note: This thread is 6296 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Unless I'm misunderstanding something (plausible) the whole point is that that is not block practice. At least not in the terms used in the study that said block practice doesn't help much.
    • Who said block practice was mindless? If you are trying to practice a 150-yard draw, 200 times. That isn't mindless. Yuou miss one right more than yo want you adjust. It isn't mindless.  Me practicing how my right hip moves in the backswing over and over again isn't mindless.  Yes, block practice is specifically doing something over and over again. It has its benefit because it can be something so specific you need to work on that it gives you the sheer volume in repetitions you need to go from novice to beginner or slightly competent. You then can go on from there to non-block practice to become proficient.  I disagree with this. If you are hitting a 7-iron to a green over and over, and if the intent is to hit the best shot you can, then that is block practice. You make little adjustments each time even if you are not thinking about them. Though, you can think about them and still call it block practice.  Again, if you know you push one just right, you make an adjustment either subconsciously or consciously. Then you hit the next one, it is right on target. Your brain locks in that as what you want it to be.  Block practice isn't defined as mindless. 
    • I guess if you're just mindlessly standing there dragging a ball over and hitting it at a green then maybe, but when I go to the range, I'm always taking feedback on what happened and adjusting what I'm doing (very slightly) to change clubface or strike point or whatever else. I suppose if I hit it absolutely perfect, I might try to change nothing, but I'm not sure I've ever hit it perfectly twice in a row.  But that kind of fine tuning I would have thought a month ago was block practice since my goal is the same with the same club and same target for each shot. I was thinking that might be not ideal based on the science that said block practice isn't as good, but now it seems that's not what those scientists meant when they said block practice and the practice I typically do is just fine.  I think it's a semantic issue where misunderstanding what the studies were actually doing is affecting how the outcome of the studies is being interpreted by lay people (like me). So: - block practice is doing the same thing over and over - block practice is not as good as variable practice - me a month ago: going to the range and hitting 7 iron to the same green is doing the same thing over and over therefore the practice I'm doing needs to change - me now: oh - actually hitting that 7 iron to the same green over and over, but making little adjustments each time is not block practice, so therefore the practice I'm doing is fine
    • I mean, doesn't it go back to intent. Lets say you hit your 7 iron 150 yards. you aim at the 150 green. You just hit 200 7-iron to that 150-yard green with a small amount of draw to the ball. I would say that is block practice.  To me, that is not different than practicing free throws in basketball.   
    • It for sure does - I do remember enough of that episode to say that that was my main takeaway from it. I guess it's pretty darn difficult to do block practice with a ball there. Maybe rehearsing a move over and over might be block practice, but even then I'm trying to do that with feedback and adjusting each time according to how the feedback is. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.