Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6102 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
okay,
so I can get a set of "average" x-14s from Callaway preowned for $200 shipped.

I can also get a pretty beat up. Here is a thread with the pictures of them:

http://thesandtrap.com/forum/showthread.php?t=23162


So, the pluses of the x-14s are:
1) callaway name
2) callaway preowned guarantees

pluses of BH-5
1) cheaper
2) I've at least seen the condition

My concern is callaway preowned definition of "average." After scouring ebay, I've found several sets of x-14s that sell for around $175.

opinions are much appreciated.

Posted
Used set of X-14's are not worth that much. Both deals suck in my opinion.

R7 Limited Patriot 9.5º
Sasquatch 15º
Idea Pro Gold Hybrid 20º
Tour Preferred Irons 4-PW
Z Smoke TP 52º SV Tour Black Satin 56º Rossa Core Classics Fontana One Tour


Posted
I got a set of Big Bertha Golds off the Callaways Preowned site about five years ago. They extended them and put the lie 2 deg upright and new grips on. Great price from what I recall. I would buy from them again in a heartbeat. Seems mine were "Average" condition. No better than "good" I am sure. I remember being skeptical at any rate before ordering. My irons looked almost brand new when I got them.

Posted
At least buying the clubs from Calloway's pre-owned program gets you the guarantee and an inspection.

If those are the only choices, I'd go the X-14s. Golf buddy of mine likes them a ton. I don't feel the BHs can hold a candle to them.

"You can live to be a hundred if you give up all the things that make you want to live to be a hundred." Woody Allen
My regular pasture.


Posted
Just to give you a little bit of inside information. The Hogan BH-5 is the Callaway X-14 Pro Series. They are the exact same specs except they have the name Hogan on them. But since Callaway owns Hogan, I would call it them the same club.

Callaway Pre-owned is not going to sell you junk. Plus if they are still running the spring test drive you can always send them back and get your full refund. The prices on the X-14's have gone up. The first week of March I bought a set of them with the uniflex steel shaft, standard everything Like New for $299. 6 of the 8 irons were still in the plastic. The price for a used set seems high, but you can always check the pga value guide and see what they are worth too.
Driver: '07 Burner 10.5* R Flex ReAx Shaft
3 Wood: '07 Burner 15* R Flex ReAx Shaft
Utility: '07 Burner Rescue 19* R Flex Reax Shaft
Irons: MP-33 3-PW S300 Shaft
Wedge: X-Forged 52* Steel Shaft Wedge: X-Forged 58* MD-C Steel Shaft Putter: Studio Select Newport 2Ball: Burner TP

Posted
Just to give you a little bit of inside information. The Hogan BH-5 is the Callaway X-14 Pro Series. They are the exact same specs except they have the name Hogan on them. But since Callaway owns Hogan, I would call it them the same club.

Then its best left to inside information

. Did Callaway make the X-14s in a offset model like I've seen in the BHs? Talk about ugly!

"You can live to be a hundred if you give up all the things that make you want to live to be a hundred." Woody Allen
My regular pasture.


Posted
Callaway Preowned rocks. The way Callaway runs their entire operation rocks. Before committing to the X14's, check out the X12's. IMO, they are a better stick, and since they are an older model, probably cheaper.

Posted
Then its best left to inside information

The X-14 Pro Series (BH-5) has less offset than the X-14 regulars. The offset look doesn't bother me much as long as the club performs for the swing I have. Think of the Pro Series like you would the newer generation of Callaway irons. For example the X-22 and X-22 tours: The X-22 would probably be used by a higher handicap because of the higher offset and more forgiveness. The X-22 Tour might be used by descent players with a repeateable swing and good ball strikers. The offset is used to help get the ball airborn and to some extent it helps to get the club face squared. I previously played the X-14 Pro Series but after 3 kids and a home, my playing time took a dive so I bought a set of X-14 regulars.

Driver: '07 Burner 10.5* R Flex ReAx Shaft
3 Wood: '07 Burner 15* R Flex ReAx Shaft
Utility: '07 Burner Rescue 19* R Flex Reax Shaft
Irons: MP-33 3-PW S300 Shaft
Wedge: X-Forged 52* Steel Shaft Wedge: X-Forged 58* MD-C Steel Shaft Putter: Studio Select Newport 2Ball: Burner TP

Posted
Callaway Preowned rocks. The way Callaway runs their entire operation rocks. Before committing to the X14's, check out the X12's. IMO, they are a better stick, and since they are an older model, probably cheaper.

hmm... the x12s are cheaper. In your opinion what makes them superior?

Posted
hmm... the x12s are cheaper. In your opinion what makes them superior?

The X-12's are cheaper solely because they're older. I played the X-12's for several years, at one point I "upgraded" to the X-14's. I couldn't wait to get back to the X-12's. For me, the performance was just better. At the very least there was no improvement between the 12's & the 14's. At least not $500 worth. If you want straight, long, soft shots, you can't go wrong with the X-12's. I assure you there are days when I wish I still had them. Of course I could say that about just about every set of irons I ever played... except those Ti-100's, now they were shovels.....

Posted
any have a link to some side by side photos to compare the head sizes of the x-12, x-14, and BH-5s?

or at least some tech specs that include head size.

Posted
Take the BH-5's and get a lesson or 2 with the extra mula.

yeah... I know that is the best advice but I rather have good clubs AND get some more lessons.


Note: This thread is 6102 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 22 - 2026-01-11 More mirror work. Back outdoors tomorrow.
    • Day 11, 1/11/26.  Today was putting, along about 6' of carpet, with coins on the ground to keep me cognizant of what I'm doing.  I think this is the at-home drill from LSW. (Ugh, missed two of the last four days -- 1/10 and 1/8)
    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.