Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6075 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
So I've been trying to find a new ball because the Pro V1 is too spinny for me and I've never been in love with the Pro V1x... so recently I've been trying out some Bridgestone balls with pretty good results, but I'm a bit confused.

I thought the B330-S ball was supposed to be the equivalent, so to speak, of the Pro V1, and the B330 is closer to the Pro V1x.

When I've been playing the Bridgestones, I see very similar results with both balls, but it seems like for me, the B330 spins MORE than the B330-S. Especially on full swings with short irons and wedges, the B330 (which I thought was supposed to spin less) can suck back 10 to 20 feet on soft greens sometimes even when I don't want it to, while the B330-S has a nice one hop and check, or I'm able to draw it back up to 10 feet or so if I want.

The distance is pretty consistent with both, maybe a slight edge to the B330, but no significant loss of distance in the S, and the feel again is pretty much the same, they both feel a little firmer than the Pro V, but not in a bad way and I've been able to get used to that.

Have I got this backwards? Or has anyone else experienced the same kind of thing with these 2 balls?
Penta TP Ball || Nakashima Golf HTEC Tour Driver - w/ Mitsubishi Rayon Bassara 83g || Izett Golf 15* Deep Face 3-Wood - w/ Royal Precision Rifle Steel || MD 18* Hybrid - w/ Aerotech SteelFiber 110g || MP-58 3, 4 Irons... MP-60 5, 6 Irons... MP-32 7-PW - w/ Dynamic Gold || MP-T 53-08...

Posted
I have no idea what is actually the case but in Bridgestone's advertisements they maintain that their tour balls are to be chosen by swingspeed as opposed to spin rate. In other words the B330RX is for amature swingspeeds (less than 100mph), the B330S is for swingspeeds betwwen 105-115mph and the B330 is for 115mph plus. I could be off slightly on those numbers (I'm just typing this from memory) but that is the gist of their marketing for the tour balls. Now their e5+, e6+, and e7+ lines are based on shot trajectory and spin. e5+ is higher spin/higher ball flight; the e6+ is lower spin, straighter ball flight; and the e7+ is lower ball flight.

Nike Vapor Speed driver 12* stock regular shaft
Nike Machspeed 4W 17*, 7W 21* stock stiff shafts
Ping i10 irons 4-9, PW, UW, SW, LW AWT stiff flex
Titleist SC Kombi 35"; Srixon Z Star XV tour yellow

Clicgear 3.0; Sun Mountain Four 5


Posted
I have no idea what is actually the case but in Bridgestone's advertisements they maintain that their tour balls are to be chosen by swingspeed as opposed to spin rate. In other words the B330RX is for amature swingspeeds (less than 100mph), the B330S is for swingspeeds betwwen 105-115mph and the B330 is for 115mph plus. I could be off slightly on those numbers (I'm just typing this from memory) but that is the gist of their marketing for the tour balls. Now their e5+, e6+, and e7+ lines are based on shot trajectory and spin. e5+ is higher spin/higher ball flight; the e6+ is lower spin, straighter ball flight; and the e7+ is lower ball flight.

Yeah, but swing speed is a bit too general for choosing a ball. There's other aspects in choosing a ball then basing it on your clubhead speed, just like there are other aspects that affect what shaft you should pick outside of clubhead speed.

That's just a generalization for the purpose of advertising. Like the generalization of "amateur" swingspeeds. I'm an amateur... and I'm well over 100 mph clubhead speed. It's not like you turn pro and suddenly gain 20 mph in clubhead speed. But that's a dumb relation.
Penta TP Ball || Nakashima Golf HTEC Tour Driver - w/ Mitsubishi Rayon Bassara 83g || Izett Golf 15* Deep Face 3-Wood - w/ Royal Precision Rifle Steel || MD 18* Hybrid - w/ Aerotech SteelFiber 110g || MP-58 3, 4 Irons... MP-60 5, 6 Irons... MP-32 7-PW - w/ Dynamic Gold || MP-T 53-08...

  • Administrator
Posted
Swing speed is typically only used as a very general, basic fitting guide, and the reason they typically recommend harder balls for higher swing speeds is because often the lower swing speeds don't generate enough spin with the driver and other longer clubs to keep the ball airborne as long as they could with a softer ball (which will spin more).

To get back to the OP, my experience confirms that the B330-S spins a bit more - just a little - and feels a bit softer. I think off full shots they may spin nearly the same, but it's spin around the greens and with other short shots - a 40-yard wedge that actually takes a hop and pulls back a foot versus one that just takes a hop and rolls two feet - that differentiate the two. In my experience, anyway. I haven't tried the Bridgestones in 2009, but I think they're still the same as last year.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I haven't tried the Bridgestones in 2009, but I think they're still the same as last year.

From what I've read the B330's changed this year. The 2007-8 balls were 3 piece and the 2009 balls are 4 piece. The 2009's are also a tad softer and have a little higher spin rate than the 2007's.

In my testing, I found the B330 and B330-S very similar. The B330-S had a little softer feel and higher spin but the difference was not drastic by any means. In the end, I felt that the B330-S was a better fit for me. For what it's worth, I'm generally "backwards" in ball selection. What I mean by that is with a driver swing speed of 118mph, I'm always fitted for the lower spinning ball (ie: the Pro V1x or B330). Oddly enough I've always felt the higher spinning/softer ball was a better fit for me (ie: Pro v1 or B330-S) so you may want to take my comments with a grain of salt.

Yonex Ezone Type 380 | Tour Edge Exotics CB Pro | Miura 1957 Irons | Yururi Wedges | Scotty Cameron Super Rat | TaylorMade Penta


Posted
Swing speed is typically only used as a very general, basic fitting guide, and the reason they typically recommend harder balls for higher swing speeds is because often the lower swing speeds don't generate enough spin with the driver and other longer clubs to keep the ball airborne as long as they could with a softer ball (which will spin more).

I would agree that on the touch shots there is a

little bit more spin with the B330-S, but for some reason on full swings the exact opposite has been true. I think, though, after reading the post after yours that I may have figured out the culprit. I believe the sleeve of B330-S balls that I picked up was an older sleeve and the B330 was the 2009 version, which theoretically would make them more similar in their spin characteristics. If it's true that the 09 balls spin a tad more, that very well could be why I'm getting flip-flopped results. Thanks guys.
Penta TP Ball || Nakashima Golf HTEC Tour Driver - w/ Mitsubishi Rayon Bassara 83g || Izett Golf 15* Deep Face 3-Wood - w/ Royal Precision Rifle Steel || MD 18* Hybrid - w/ Aerotech SteelFiber 110g || MP-58 3, 4 Irons... MP-60 5, 6 Irons... MP-32 7-PW - w/ Dynamic Gold || MP-T 53-08...

Posted
I played a couple of rounds with a sleeve of B330 RX last week. They're actually too soft and spin too much. It felt like i was hitting one of those pelz practice balls. Espeically with the driver.
THE WEAPONS CACHE..

Titleist 909 D2 9.5 Degree Driver| Titleist 906f4 13.5 degree 3-Wood | Titleist 909 17 & 21 degree hybrid | Titleist AP2 irons
Titleist Vokey Wedges - 52 & 58 | Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 Putter | ProV1 Ball

Posted
Yeah, but swing speed is a bit too general for choosing a ball. There's other aspects in choosing a ball then basing it on your clubhead speed, just like there are other aspects that affect what shaft you should pick outside of clubhead speed.

It has to do with the core compression.

According to Bridgestone, slower swing speeds do not compress the core enough to last the entire ball flight. As the core decompresses in flight the side spin starts to take over and slice/hook. That is why they offer the 3 tour balls that they do, based on the swing speed. The only real difference is the core compression appearantly. So the spin around the greens would be similiar, but not identical. Whereas the driver spin, and flight, is the true difference. This is all based on my conversation at the Demo Day I went to.

LD F Speed 9.5 Driver Stiff
MX 700 3W Stiff
MP Fli Hi 2, 3, 4
MP 52 5i-9i
MP-T 47.06, 51.06, & 58.10 White Hot XG Teron Putter ProV1x ShoesQUOTE:"I will judge my rounds much more by the quality of my best shots than the acceptability of my worse ones" - Terry "The Wedge Guy" Koehler


Posted
if a ball has a harder compression rate and you can't compress it it will spin more ie. 2007 golf digest ball test prov 1x spinning more than the pro v1

driver. taylormade tour burner tp ust avixcore tour green 75 x
3 wood 909 f3 13* voodo xnv8
3 hybrid adams idea pro vs proto 95x
irons 3 no 4 5-pw nike cci forged blades
gap wedge nike sv tour blacksand wedge cg14 56* 14flopadopolous vokey spin milled 64 7putter scotty cameron classics newport...


  • Administrator
Posted
if a ball has a harder compression rate and you can't compress it it will spin more ie. 2007 golf digest ball test prov 1x spinning more than the pro v1

The 2007 Pro V1x did spin a bit more off irons (not the driver) with some swing conditions. Not all, but some. On short game shots and with the driver, the Pro V1 still spun more due to the lower compression and the softer cover.

But higher compression balls don't spin more when you don't compress them. That part's backwards.
According to Bridgestone, slower swing speeds do not compress the core enough to last the entire ball flight. As the core decompresses in flight the side spin starts to take over and slice/hook.

The ball decompresses the instant it leaves the club. It has the same backspin and sidespin properties (except to lose some of each throughout the duration of the flight).

A good ball flight, particularly with the driver, requires a few things: ball speed, launch angle, and spin. With lower swing speed you'll get lower ball speed, and that'll require a higher launch angle and more spin to keep the ball aloft. A higher compression ball won't compress as much and thus won't get as much spin. It'll knuckle off the driver a little bit, and THAT is why a lot of ball companies tout their lower compression balls as "for slower swing speeds."

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 6075 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.