Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6034 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Well, I was watching the tournament today. The 18th hole, Tiger plays "conservative" and hits 3 wood, 318 yards down the middle. That distance is incredible. There is no shot under 240 yards I've ever seen Tiger hit that I don't think I could replicate (surely, not as consistently, nor even often on some of his better)- but the point is that the distance and accuracy from the tee made me feel inspired.

I spent 3 hours on the range today, grooving a swing with my short irons. I was knocking down the flag. My 9-iron went from a consistent 155 to a consistent 162 over the course of 3 hours by improving swing dynamics. I hit 30 greens in a row wit the 9 iron at 160 (the practice green was only about 18 yards wide) and hit about 30 56* wedges at 105 yards - two of them clanked off the bottom of pin. I putted for a few hours and then played 9 holes with 8/9 GIR at 34 (-2) and I mis-read and lipped out a few short putts or it would have been a 30-31. I hit it in the trees on both Par 5s and had to chip out to the fairway. On several other holes, I had to bend it around the trees because of mediocre drives, but still got it to stick on the correct quadrant of the green. The course was on the "short and tight" scale, but it was still very frustrating.


Looking at my stats, I lack in overall driving (length and accuracy) but my GIR percentage is around 70% (some months around 80%), which is better than most tour players (I play easier courses - definitely not claiming to be better). I know my putting can be great when I put in the time, but it's something that requires constant maintenance. When I spent several hours per week just working on putting technique, like i have in the past, I can get my putting a hair short of tour-level, but I've never managed to get my driving to that level and really tough, long courses totally eat me alive.

Averaging 290 (at sea level) is out of my league. I would be amongst the shortest hitters on tour (sea level average about 260), but my accuracy is often under 50% unless I'm playing huge fairways, which kills me. If I wasn't so short, I could hit irons and play fairways and greens, but I just can't reach the long par 4s with anything but a driver. A 3-wood flies 250-ish at altitude (that's about 235 at sea level?). I've absolutely roped a 3 wood a few times in my life out to about 275 at altitude (maybe 250 sea level), but I felt like I shattered the ball swinging about as hard as I could and hitting it right on the screws.

I couldn't reach but 1 or 2 of the par 5s played by the PGA tour the entire season and those 500 yard par 4s would require absolutely nutting two shots just to reach it (not accounting for soft fairways)... even when I was playing my best.

I've played as low as +2.5 on the handicap and honestly, I feel like after the swing change this week and the practice sessions today and yesterday, I'm playing hitting my irons better than that right now. But where is my driver? Maybe it's a strength thing? I'm a pretty skinny guy.

Anyway, watching Tiger smooth a 3 wood out 320 yards today, I felt inspired to go out and do some strength training as well as swing exercises to gain some more length off the Tee. In order to play 7600 yard courses, I'm often swinging out of my shoes just to reach the fairway and though my tempo feels pretty good, I think I'm leaving some distance out there. My iron distances are within about 5% of tour players and I swing my irons with about 80% effort. But my driver is a full 10-20% shorter, even with a 95% swing.

Anyway. I wanted to write this all down so I have some incentive to pursue it.

Work is going to keep me off the golf course during the next few weeks, so I think I might hit the health-club at the hotel while I'm traveling the next few weeks.

Thanks for listening to my ramble!

Driver: 905S 8* - Graffaloy Blue 65S Shaft (tipped 1" Short)
Fairway: 960F (15*, 19*)
Irons: T-Zoid Pro 4-PW w/ True Temper Steel
Wedges: MP-R Black 52*, 56*
Lob: 60* CG-10 (nice and rusty)Putter: OZ Putter (with oversized Winn Blue Grip)Ball:: One Tour


Note: This thread is 6034 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • That feels off. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? Cuz your last few posts are very strange and include a ton of links, almost all of which go to that particular YT channel. It feels strange if you're not that guy, and is a breach of rules if you are.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.