Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 7094 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
i recently picked up my clubs again after a 6 or 7 month hiatus. before the break i had just bought some new irons and i was in the process of buying a new driver, & 3/5 woods but i never got around to it.

i was hoping to hear some ideas or suggestions of whats good out there these days. more specifically, any feedback on the r7 425 vs the 905R.
i was also thinking of dropping the 5 wood from my bag and going with some sort of rescue or hybrid club.



currently my bag consists of:
driver: 975jvs
3/5 wood: taylormade steel; the model before vsteel.
irons 4-pw: titleist 690cb steel shafts
sw: 456 vokey 56, 60.
putter: scotty cameron newport 2
ball: prov1/hx

i know its not a very detailed description of the bag, but i figure its enough to give an idea.

905R 9.5* Fujikura Speeder
200 steel 3 wood
200 steel 5 wood
690.CB 3-PW
56* 14 Pro Platinum Newport 2 Pro V1 B330-S


Posted
welcome back from the little break of yours...

looking at those drivers... ok, well first let me say I am a little biased because I currently am playing the R but here we go: personally I have lost a lot of confidence in Taylormade, when the original r7 came out they came out with something so unique and amazing... it was truly a players club, then the designers over at Taylormade realized the level needed for this club and they started making the next generation r7's... more colorful, all garbage...

if you demo the r7 you'll feel a really hot face, but you'll also see very little control... what I love about the 905R is that the clubhead has a little more weight... when combined with the UST V2 shaft (77grams) I have really strong control of the club...

the r7 will be lighter in feel... it all comes down to preference of feel, make sure you get fitted... shaft selection will be a big factor with both of these clubs...

let us know how you do

Daniel Duarte
905R UST Proforce V2 76g 44" S
904F 15, Graphite Design YS6+
MD Hybrid, 19 Degree, UST V2 Hybrid S
Pro M Gunmetal 5-PW, Nippon 1150GH Pro SVokey Oil Can 52 - RAWVokey Spin Milled Oil Can 56, 60 - RAWTEI3 Newport II - Torch Copper- Prov1x


Posted
personally I have lost a lot of confidence in Taylormade, when the original r7 came out they came out with something so unique and amazing... it was truly a players club, then the designers over at Taylormade realized the level needed for this club and they started making the next generation r7's... more colorful, all garbage...

I'm not a big fan of r7's due to feel and sound at impact, but this statement must be the stupidest thing I ever read

It's not about colors, read up on the technology behind the 425 and 460 r7 in comparison to the "old" r7.
if you demo the r7 you'll feel a really hot face, but you'll also see very little control... what I love about the 905R is that the clubhead has a little more weight... when combined with the UST V2 shaft (77grams) I have really strong control of the club...

very little control vs. Titleist??? I said above it was a stupidest statement I ever read, I need to retract it. This one is. There is no other club in golf giving you less forgiveness that Titleist driver. If you are 0.5mm off sweet spot - you'll see/feel/hear the difference. This what makes them good. This makes them favorite for very good players. TM allows you for more misses, keeping the ball in play. If this is not "control" - I don't know what you referring to. Ever occured to you that the shaft you tried with wasn't right for you and this caused you to spray the drives?

Weight argument is bogus as well - that's why TM has the weight kit, so you can NEVER tell, that the weight of it isn't right for you. You right, the shaft means a lot. Don't say clubhead is crap only because you haven't try it with correct shaft.
...it all comes down to preference of feel, make sure you get fitted... shaft selection will be a big factor with both of these clubs...

finally you said something smart. 1 out of 3 ain't bad

Instead of reading people bashing one or another driver - there is only one way to make an educated guess: find a launch monitor equipped fitter in your area. Hit all possible driver / shaft combos, get a couple that gives you ballistcally and mathematically the best preformance - then try to get a demo of each and try it out on the course. Picking a driver is as personal as picking a girlfriend - you don't want to listen to others
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
prutkows,

You should take a long, hard look at the Callway FT-3.

It looks odd and sounds like a softball bat, but if you can get past the different feel, you'll have a driver with ball speeds that average 2-3mph faster than anything else on the market. Not to mention incredible forgiveness. Just make sure you get fit for it. It is such a low spin head that it is likely you will have to go up in loft to establish the same launch conditions.

Also, Callway's optifit system has made it very easy to find the right shaft for both consumers and clubfitters. Every other OEM out there needs to play catch up.

Posted
welcome back from the little break of yours...

DDBowdoin,

Just so you're not confused, the reason TaylorMade and Nike have added colorful stripes to their clubs is for one reason, and one reason alone. TV recognition. When a pro swings an R7 425 and SQ on TV, you knw exactly what driver it is in an instant. This whole trend started with one company, Aldila, who was smart enough to make thier NV shaft the most off color green they could so television viewers would recognize it and want to buy it in the stores. Their strategy worked, and every other OEM has followed suit. I find it odd that you would discredit the yellow stripe on TaylorMade's drivers which is impossible to see from address, yet you can stare down at a tri colored shaft with graphics and specs scrawled all over it?

Posted
I would have loved to have seen Taylormade make a 460 driver with the performance specs of the original r7... new r7460 doesn't cut it...

Daniel Duarte
905R UST Proforce V2 76g 44" S
904F 15, Graphite Design YS6+
MD Hybrid, 19 Degree, UST V2 Hybrid S
Pro M Gunmetal 5-PW, Nippon 1150GH Pro SVokey Oil Can 52 - RAWVokey Spin Milled Oil Can 56, 60 - RAWTEI3 Newport II - Torch Copper- Prov1x


Posted
very little control vs. Titleist??? I said above it was a stupidest statement Iever read, I need to retract it. This one is. There is no other club in golf giving you less forgiveness that Titleist driver. If you are 0.5mm off sweet spot - you'll see/feel/hear the difference. This what makes them good. This makes them favorite for very good players. TM allows you for more misses, keeping the ball in play. If this is not "control" - I don't know what you referring to. Ever occured to you that the shaft you tried with wasn't right for you and this caused you to spray the drives?

I guess I didnt clearly express what I was trying to. What I meant by that I am a good enough player that I make consistent contact with my driver and when I hit the new r7's in the center of the clubface I felt as if the face was so hot that driver put the ball out far but at contact I had no idea where the ball was going. I completely agree that the Titleist is the least forgiving driver out there but as contact I know exactly where my ball is going... you put it very well, I failed my first attempt

Daniel Duarte
905R UST Proforce V2 76g 44" S
904F 15, Graphite Design YS6+
MD Hybrid, 19 Degree, UST V2 Hybrid S
Pro M Gunmetal 5-PW, Nippon 1150GH Pro SVokey Oil Can 52 - RAWVokey Spin Milled Oil Can 56, 60 - RAWTEI3 Newport II - Torch Copper- Prov1x


Posted
I would have loved to have seen Taylormade make a 460 driver with the performance specs of the original r7... new r7460 doesn't cut it...

DDBowdoin,

They're aimed at different segments of the golfing population. The original R7 400cc is a very low spin and low launch head. The R7 460 is a high launch high spin head. The division is similar to Titliest's 905S and 905R heads, they're aimed to fit different players needs. If you want a low spin, low launch head at 460cc, take a look at Callaway's FT-3. If you need a high launch, low spin head at 460cc look into the Cleveland Hi-bore.

Posted
yeah, I know.... I was just stating that I would have liked to have seen them carry the club in that direction...

Daniel Duarte
905R UST Proforce V2 76g 44" S
904F 15, Graphite Design YS6+
MD Hybrid, 19 Degree, UST V2 Hybrid S
Pro M Gunmetal 5-PW, Nippon 1150GH Pro SVokey Oil Can 52 - RAWVokey Spin Milled Oil Can 56, 60 - RAWTEI3 Newport II - Torch Copper- Prov1x


Posted
...It looks odd and sounds like a softball bat...

ugh... that was very gently put

This club is awful and sounds.. well.. I don't know even how to describe it I give it a try, but after 4 rounds I decided it was buggin' me too much - back to eBay Of course - feel and looks are VERY subjective. Indeed - if you get past that - it's a nice stick. I didn't make it
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I would have loved to have seen Taylormade make a 460 driver with the performance specs of the original r7... new r7460 doesn't cut it...

when you're talking taylor made drivers - you have to limit yourself to the "TP" versions. Clubs w/o the TP are aimed at broad public, not picky and skilled players like most people on this forum

Titleist doesn't even have a "public" version - Cobra subdivision is covering this market. Titleist marketing strategy (made publicly in their ad slogan) is "serious clubs for serious player". If you compare 905R to r7 (without TP) is like comparing Porsche 911 GT2 to a Porsche 911.. looks similiar - it's in totally different class though
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
when you're talking taylor made drivers - you have to limit yourself to the "TP" versions. Clubs w/o the TP are aimed at broad public, not picky and skilled players like most people on this forum

totally true... I miss my old r7... it was a really nice club but I struggled with the size, I just needed that little bit more forgiveness... I have zero complaints about my 905, I think the ust V2 is just as important to me as the head... its the first driver I've really been fitted to

Daniel Duarte
905R UST Proforce V2 76g 44" S
904F 15, Graphite Design YS6+
MD Hybrid, 19 Degree, UST V2 Hybrid S
Pro M Gunmetal 5-PW, Nippon 1150GH Pro SVokey Oil Can 52 - RAWVokey Spin Milled Oil Can 56, 60 - RAWTEI3 Newport II - Torch Copper- Prov1x


Posted
I like my r7 460. If I played more often, I'm sure that I would care more about workability and lower spin, and grab the TP model.

Except A) I (and most of the world) don't have $800 to spend on a driver, and B) because I don't play as often, I need something that'll cover me when I'm a little off with my swing. The higher launch angle has really helped out with getting a few yards of extra distance too, and negating some ugly sidespin that rears its head a little too often. Besides, no shame in hitting something that launches high... quite a few tour players are playing the r7 460 and even the r7 HT...

To me, the r7 460 is a fun club to hit. As soon as Taylor Made signs me to an endorsement deal, I'll pick up a 425 TP.

"I played like shit." -Greg Norman after the '96 Masters.


Posted

thank you everyone for all the input on drivers. any ideas as far as 3woods/hybrids go?

prutkows,

i actually got the chance to use my friends ft-3 a few days ago. his was heel weighted to avoid slices, 11*, and it had the adila nvs stock shaft.

although the extra heel weight helped me hit the ball straighter, the ball trajectory was still a little flat, even with the 11* loft.

905R 9.5* Fujikura Speeder
200 steel 3 wood
200 steel 5 wood
690.CB 3-PW
56* 14 Pro Platinum Newport 2 Pro V1 B330-S


Posted
thank you everyone for all the input on drivers. any ideas as far as 3woods/hybrids go?

I'm a TM man, their fwy woods are sweet. If I was on the market I'd check out :

1. sonartec driving cavity woods 2. tour edge "exotics" series woods 3. r7 fairway woods I still haven't found a good replacement for my steel 200 and v-steel woods though
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I'm a TM man, their fwy woods are sweet. If I was on the market I'd check out :

i'm still using steel 200 3/5 woods as well :] i think i might keep the 3 wood and just replace the 5 with a hybrid.

905R 9.5* Fujikura Speeder
200 steel 3 wood
200 steel 5 wood
690.CB 3-PW
56* 14 Pro Platinum Newport 2 Pro V1 B330-S


Posted
Whats interesting is the person who plays all Titleist clubs suggested the Titleist driver, and the person who plays al Taylor Made clubs suggested the Taylor Made driver... What I think it all really comes down to is feel and comfort level. Granted there are other issues like getting fit that you cant hear enough times these days. But when you look down at the club, what do you want to see? I'm a titleist player, I want a Titleist club. My father is a callaway, he wants that. My brother, a Nike....you get where I'm going... Obviously if that means nothing to you, then select whatever you hit the best....

In my bag:
Driver: 905T 10.5 YS-6 Regular Flex
3 wood: r7 steel 15 degree stiff
Hybrid: Rescue Mid 19 degree stiff
Irons: 735.CM 4-PWedges: 52, 56, 60 vokey oil canPutter: 2ball white steelBall: Pro V1Home Course: http://www.millcreekgolf.com


Note: This thread is 7094 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.