Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5800 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I don't necessarily mean "clone" but I mean brands like GigaGolf, Pine Meadow, etc., etc..

Anyway can you guys list as many brands as you know, like the ones stated above? I just want to see how many there are.

Posted

bang golf is not a "clone" company. They make original designs and are considered part of the component golf club industry.

Bang golf, Alpha golf, SMT, Tom Wishon, Hireko, Golfsmith, Golf works, Integra golf, Krank golf are just a few of the component golf club companies out there. Component club companies are companies that allow you to purchase just the individual piece and assemble the clubs yourself. For the club builder / fitter. This gives that person an excellent range of options for heads / shafts / etc. Srixon has actually embraced this and allows select resellers to purchase just the heads now.

In my bag:

some golf clubs

a few golf balls

a bag of tee's some already broken the rest soon to be

a snickers wrapper (if you have seen me play, you would know you are not going anywhere for a while)

and an empty bottle of water


Posted
bang golf is not a "clone" company. They make original designs and are considered part of the component golf club industry.

take the time to read the OP, he wasn't looking for clones. and these companies will sell you completed/assembled clubs.

"You can live to be a hundred if you give up all the things that make you want to live to be a hundred." Woody Allen
My regular pasture.


Posted
  JOSEPHLB said:
Hireko isn't truely "all component".

In the end everybody is a clone of everybody else. When one company discovers something that works, everybody else tries to improve upon the design. There are very few truely unique designs. The Acer line may have some similarities, but the new XK and XC stuff appears to me to be unique.

In my bag:

some golf clubs

a few golf balls

a bag of tee's some already broken the rest soon to be

a snickers wrapper (if you have seen me play, you would know you are not going anywhere for a while)

and an empty bottle of water


Posted
  alf174 said:
take the time to read the OP, he wasn't looking for clones. and these companies will sell you completed/assembled clubs.

I know what the OP meant. But I was under the impression that he was looking for companies that sell brands that are inspired by top tier brands. Both of his examples were websites that list directly on the site what club it is supposed to be similar to.

The ones I listed (while some of them have been known to copy certain club characteristics) are generally all known for having original designs.

In my bag:

some golf clubs

a few golf balls

a bag of tee's some already broken the rest soon to be

a snickers wrapper (if you have seen me play, you would know you are not going anywhere for a while)

and an empty bottle of water


Posted
In the end everybody is a clone of everybody else. When one company discovers something that works, everybody else tries to improve upon the design. There are very few truely unique designs. The Acer line may have some similarities, but the new XK and XC stuff appears to me to be unique.

Yep! Its a given.. especially since 99% of all clubheads come from the few foundries that put out the stuff, in the first place. Even some of the good clones come out of the same foundries that the big name OEM's come out of!

Brand •••••s really get their panties in a bunch when you throw the real facts at them.

Posted
  JOSEPHLB said:
Yep! Its a given.. especially since 99% of all clubheads come from the few foundries that put out the stuff, in the first place. Even some of the good clones come out of the same foundries that the big name OEM's come out of!

playing devils advocate - its not to say you don't get something for the money when you buy the brand name stuff.

Resale value, customer sevice, greatly improved warranty, better quality control. These are a few of the reasons why to choose a name brand over a component brand. In the end though, alot of the money you pay when you buy a top branded club is because of the marketing they do, and the markup the store that is selling them has.

In my bag:

some golf clubs

a few golf balls

a bag of tee's some already broken the rest soon to be

a snickers wrapper (if you have seen me play, you would know you are not going anywhere for a while)

and an empty bottle of water


Note: This thread is 5800 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Swing check. Cons: The countertop drill hasn't taken yet. Not crazy about A5 to A6 hand path. Pros: Decent BS width at A2 and right elbow at A4. All in all, not terrible but meh..
    • Day 74 (14 Jul 25) - Late afternoon session w/9i, magnetic alignment stick, Divot board and hard foam balls.  Worked on getting the face square at setup and then returning to same through the swing.  The lines on the Divot Board served as referenced parallels for the alignment stick.  Did hit a few balls about 30 total - half with using the alighment stick on the club face and half without.  First time working with the magnetic alignment rod - really reveals when you have the face closed/open/etc. 
    • I mean, that is what I figure would be the case.  My mind is just trying to wrap around the idea that 22" left = feet aiming like 15 yards left visually. It's like in a CADD system, if the flag is the base point when you scale an image, it stays in the same spot as you get closer (scale up) or get further away (scale down).  I can image how if you have a 10-yard chip, it could look much more like your feet are aimed nearly 22" left of the flag.  Now I want to try to make some measurements and quantify this 🤣.  Yes, they do. Yea, that is true. 
    • Closer to like 22" than 36. Why wouldn't the target line (ball) be at the target (flag) with your feet parallel left of that? Perception messes with a lot of people. Almost all righties tend to aim to the right, because what feels parallel left — particularly given that your eyes are "between" the ball and your feet — feel like they're pointed MILES left even when they're square. Also, there's no rule that you have to be parallel left of the target line. I like to be slightly open at setup.
    • Depends on the lie, pin location, green.  I would say most of my pitches are with my 60-degree.  Its probably like 90% 60-degree, 10% 56 degree. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

Join us here in The Sand Trap!

Registration is free and takes almost no time. You'll see one fewer ad per page and be ready to jump in and contribute your thoughts to any subject!

Click here to register (registration will open in a new page so you can continue to read what you came to read).

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...