Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Bring back Stableford!!!


Note: This thread is 5930 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
After watching another yet another standard medal play event I have become nostalgic for the days of the International when the players played a modified Stableford scoring system. The PGA tour only has one event (match play) that has a different format. We either need more match play or a team event or something that would distinguish an event from the rest. If I were the chairman of the Deere or some other lesser event I would institute Stableford to create some buzz.

Posted
After watching another yet another standard medal play event I have become nostalgic for the days of the International when the players played a modified Stableford scoring system. The PGA tour only has one event (match play) that has a different format. We either need more match play or a team event or something that would distinguish an event from the rest. If I were the chairman of the Deere or some other lesser event I would institute Stableford to create some buzz.

I'd like to see more match play.

driver: FT-i tlcg 9.5˚ (Matrix Ozik XCONN Stiff)
4 wood: G10 (ProLaunch Red FW stiff)
3 -PW: :Titleist: 695 mb (Rifle flighted 6.0)
wedges:, 52˚, 56˚, 60˚
putter: Studio Select Newport 1.5


Posted
I would love to see the PGA championship go back to match play. It is kind of the odd child as far as the 4 majors go and was match play until like 1958 or somewhere around there. This would distinguish it from the others. Make is the same format as the us amateur. 36 holes qualifying for 64 spots. it would give a club pro or two a chance to make it through some rounds of match play and really compete. The downside is you may end up with a less than disireable matchup on sunday which would hurt ratings but what would be better than and tiger phil head to head battle for a major.

Driver: Titleist 905R 9.5 UST V2
3-wood: Ping TiSi 15*
Hybrid: Cobra Baffler Pro 18*
Irons: Mizuno MP-30
Wedges: 52* Cleveland CG12, 58* Vokey Spin MilledPutter: Ping Lil' C belly putterBall: Pro V1xwww.crestwoodcc.org


  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
I would love to see the PGA championship go back to match play. It is kind of the odd child as far as the 4 majors go and was match play until like 1958 or somewhere around there. This would distinguish it from the others. Make is the same format as the us amateur. 36 holes qualifying for 64 spots. it would give a club pro or two a chance to make it through some rounds of match play and really compete. The downside is you may end up with a less than disireable matchup on sunday which would hurt ratings but what would be better than and tiger phil head to head battle for a major.

I totally agree.

I actually sometimes feel like the majors should all have their own distinguishing factors that make them "Major" Seems like instead of going that route, it's been more of "How absolutely difficult can we make this golf course play?" Not really a fan of that anymore.

Posted
I would love to see the PGA championship go back to match play. It is kind of the odd child as far as the 4 majors go and was match play until like 1958 or somewhere around there. This would distinguish it from the others. Make is the same format as the us amateur. 36 holes qualifying for 64 spots. it would give a club pro or two a chance to make it through some rounds of match play and really compete. The downside is you may end up with a less than disireable matchup on sunday which would hurt ratings but what would be better than and tiger phil head to head battle for a major.

I'd personally like to see it but unfortunately the reality of the day is TV coverage. And not just the finals matchup, in stroke play, the camera can move to several groupings when the leaders are between shots - in matchplay there is too much dead air for their liking. And as you mentioned, if Tiger is out of it early (like more than a couple Accenture Match Play events) - the TV rankings tank.

Maybe if would be pretty neat to have a five-round PGA. The first with 256 players do or die stroke play round with the top 128 making match play. There might be a lot of interest to see whether some touring pros make the cut or not. And in a single round of golf, anything can happen. This could be followed by two rounds of Match play of 128 players. This also might be neat to see club pros matched up against touring pros. And then the final two rounds stroke play with the top 32 participating. One weakness to this would be that bad weather could really play havoc on a five round tournament. Still, it would be a rather unique format and I'm also of the opinion that the PGA is the weak step-sister to the other majors.

Driver: G10 9.5*
Fairway Woods: 3 & 5
Hybrid: 21*
Irons: I10 4 - 9
Wedges: 48* + Spin-Milled 54 & 60*Putter: Rossa FontanaBall: B330-RX


Posted
I'd like to see more match play.

I second that nomination. This cup was one of the first time I was able to watch a bit of match play for more than a few holes. I love the strategic element hole by hole and then overall for the match. It makes for some very exciting golf when one bad shot can cost you a hole that you might not be able to get back easily. Even the 4-5 foot 'gimmes' become more pressure filled and challenging.


Posted
I too would love to see some more match play. Match play is a huge part of golf in the grand scale. So in my mind, if these guys are professional golfers, they should have to play a proportionate amount of match play. I'd just like to see the gap between what they do and what the rest of us do narrowed a little.
It didn't occur to me until now but, how many match-play events are there on the LPGA tour? They might sprinkle in a few to add some interest. Worth a shot IMO.

Posted

I don't they do a lot of match play because Geoff Ogilvy would win them all

Driver: taylormade.gif Tour Burner 9.5*
4 Wood: taylormade.gif200 Steel 16*
Irons: taylormade.gif Burner '09
Wedges: taylormade.gif RAC TP Satin 54*, 58*
Putter: odyssey.gif White Hot Tour #9  Ball: bridgestone.gif B330


Note: This thread is 5930 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.