Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5937 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I just heard this story and situation today and didn't really know how to respond.

This guy was teeing off at a residential area golf course. He hadn't ever been to the course before so he didn't know the area. He slices his ball off the hole and seemingly into someone's yard. The house is out of view and he never sees the ball land or hit anything so he assumes it is OB. He hits a provisional and that ball is in play. So he is driving down the cart path and sees his provisional ball and another ball rolling down the cart path way up in front of him. He proceeds to that ball and looks at it and it was his first ball. Again he never sees the ball land or what might have happened after it was out of view. He played the first ball and made birdie. His thinking was that since he was unsure what happened, and it was his first ball, he was free to play it where it ended up. What would the ruling be?

His best guess is that he hit the ball in someone's yard and they just decided to throw it back on the course. I know rule 19-1 states that a ball moved by and outside agency is 'rub of the green' and play it as it lies. He gained a huge advantage from the outside agency so would the rule still be in effect and played as it lies?

I will judge my rounds much more by the quality of my best shots than the acceptability of my worse ones.


Posted
i find that to be an odd situation. one way or another he shouldnt have made birdie

Forget your opponents; always play against par. ~Sam Snead

Sumo2 5900 9.5, ProForce V2 stiff
Diablo 3w
Baffler TWS 3h MP57 4-pw VR wedge 52.10, 56.14 TPz 60.06 Studio Style Newport 2 SG5ProV1x


Posted
I know rule 19-1 states that a ball moved by and outside agency is 'rub of the green' and play it as it lies. He gained a huge advantage from the outside agency so would the rule still be in effect and played as it lies?

Rule 19 covers a "ball in motion" stopped or deflected.

Rule 18 however, stipulates that a "ball at rest" moved by an outside agency must be replaced. In this situation, I have no idea the ruling.

Posted
Last week my partner lost his ball near a tree that is by a red staked hazard. We search and can't find the ball. He drops second ball. Well he takes a practice swing the wind blows his first ball out to of the tree. (; soemtimes you get a break in golf - but most times you don't
Driver R7 Superquad NV 55 shaft or Bridgestone J33 460 NV 75 shaft
3 and 5 Wood X
Hybrid original Fli Hi 21* or FT 22*
Irons AP2
Wedges Vokey 52* - 8 , 56* 14, 60*-7Putter California CoranodoBall TP RedGPS NeoRange Finder- Bushnell Tour V2 When Chuck Norris puts spin on the ball, the ball does not...

Posted
I believe if you drop a ball that is officialy your new ball of play and a 1 stroke drop

4dx hybrid Graphite Irons
3-4 Hybrid
Pipe Putter
Titleist Pro V1...I lose enough of em
Revolver Pro 440sz


Posted
Rule 18 however, stipulates that a "ball at rest" moved by an outside agency must be replaced.

Good point. I was only looking at the ball in motion rule. The certainty thing in the rule would be the big issue. Although you would think that for a ball to change direction and be moving a few minutes after it was hit, it would have to come to rest then the outside agency would have to have moved it. In that case the ball should have been replaced. It would have been OB then he should have played the provisional.

I will judge my rounds much more by the quality of my best shots than the acceptability of my worse ones.


Posted
There were situations when Arnold played when fans would intentionally block balls headed for the water or slap balls in flight toward the fairway/green. The rulings in those cases were to play the ball from where it most likely would have ended up. Probably "in equity".

Posted
There were situations when Arnold played when fans would intentionally block balls headed for the water or slap balls in flight toward the fairway/green. The rulings in those cases were to play the ball from where it most likely would have ended up. Probably "in equity".

What U r referring to is somewhat different from the problem at hand and decisions can be found solving the former. The original question is much more complicated.

As usual, facts are decisive. If it is more or less clear that the ball ended OB it has to be regarded to have been OB and any action thereafter is really not of any importance. From the original description I got the impression that considerable time had elapsed between the landing of the ball and reappearance of it. This speaks for the assumption that an outside agency had been involved. Not an easy case to solve, though, at least beyond any doubt.

Note: This thread is 5937 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Day 11, 1/11/26.  Today was putting, along about 6' of carpet, with coins on the ground to keep me cognizant of what I'm doing.  I think this is the at-home drill from LSW. (Ugh, missed two of the last four days -- 1/10 and 1/8)
    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.