Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5925 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Hey guys I'm in the market for a PING 1-A putter. I have heard SOOO MANY good things about them and I just love the classic look (Not that big into the space ship looking putters these days).

My question is this:

I can buy a BRAND NEW one (Ping still makes them) for $100 bucks. Or I can search for a OLD used one for probably a little more money.

Are teh old ones better? Better feel? Better "PING" sound? Does the age of teh older ones make them a all around better putter (Kinda like how a guitar starts to sound better with age).

OR is it just the because they are OLD and people like older things haha?

Just trying to figure out if the performance/feel/sound will be worth waiting and searching for a OLDER 1-A putter OR will I get the same performance?

Posted
Somewhat relevant to the topic:

My putter is an old Anser. My grandfather bought it new back in '69 and gave it to me in '85. I've gamed it ever since. After getting back into the game seriously last year I checked out my putter on line and figured out that it was pretty old so I bought a new/used Karsten series Anser to game and retired the old putter. While the current Karsten series Anser is a great putter I found myself preferring my old one. Eventually I traded the Karsten in and put my old anser back in the bag. The decision was based more on feel, look, and sound rather than performance. I putted just as well with the new anser but I'm just used to the old one. The old putter feels slightly softer (it's some brass alloy), and the sound it makes when you hit the sweet spot is very distinctive The new putter felt fine, but it lacked that sound, and I'm just used to getting that particular form of feedback from the putter.

Nike Vapor Speed driver 12* stock regular shaft
Nike Machspeed 4W 17*, 7W 21* stock stiff shafts
Ping i10 irons 4-9, PW, UW, SW, LW AWT stiff flex
Titleist SC Kombi 35"; Srixon Z Star XV tour yellow

Clicgear 3.0; Sun Mountain Four 5


Posted
I've got a Ping 1-A from the early 80s as well as an Anser from the mid 70s and some other older Pings. I love them all and I played the 1-A and Anser when I was on varsity in high school. Not sure about the newer reincarnations of the Ping classic models. You should be able to get a 1-A from at least the 80s or 70s in the $100 range or less on e-bay.

In a staff blue  Aerolite III

Razr Hawk 10.5* (BB 63 S)
Orig Steelhead 4W 16.8* (F)
Orig Steelhead 7W 20* (M-10)

 JPX-800 Pro 4-pw (XP S300)

 MP-T Blk Ni 51.06, MP-T Blk Ni 56.14, MP-T Blk Ni 58.10

  Bettinardi BC-1 (34")

TM TP Black


Note: This thread is 5925 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.