Jump to content
IGNORED

ball flight question


Note: This thread is 6478 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Hopefully I'm asking this in the correct forum.

At the range today as I worked through my clubs, I noticed that while my 18 degree hybrid and my driver have a fairly penetrating ball flight that I'm happy with. However, my 3 wood has an ever-rising flight, starting out low and going up to near-driver height before it starts to descend.

If what I've read is right, this means that the club is imparting excess backspin on the ball which may be robbing me of some distance and roll. Is this correct? Is it something that I should address or leave alone? Would a different club or shaft help?

Titleist 907D1 10.5°
Titleist 906F4 15.5°
Titleist 906F4 18.5°
Wilson Staff Pi5 3-P
Titleist Vokey 56.14Cleveland CG12 60°Scotty Cameron Newport Two

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
If what I've read is right, this means that the club is imparting excess backspin on the ball which may be robbing me of some distance and roll. Is this correct? Is it something that I should address or leave alone? Would a different club or shaft help?

Almost every club actually hits the ball to about the same height. Your pitching wedge goes about as high as your driver - it just gets there more quickly because it has a larger vertical component.

But if the ball rises unnaturally - it curves upward - that may indicate excessive backspin. That's "ballooning" and if you face a shot into the wind, it can really hurt your distance. If the ball just goes up on a fairly straight line, that is okay. I can hit my r7 TP 3W really high... but it's not a ballooning flight. A different clubhead or shaft may help, but I'd first look at your swing. Is it pretty level, or are you hitting down through the ball with the 3W? Off a tee or the ground (or does it make no difference)?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Almost every club actually hits the ball to about the same height. Your pitching wedge goes about as high as your driver - it just gets there more quickly because it has a larger vertical component.

Well, I was hitting the ball off the mat when this was happening and it was definitely an upward curve. I was sweeping the ball nicely without much, if any, contact with the mat. Contact was really solid. My swing felt about as flat as it ever has. I fight the tendency to take the club back outside, so I definitely know what a steep swing feels like.

Titleist 907D1 10.5°
Titleist 906F4 15.5°
Titleist 906F4 18.5°
Wilson Staff Pi5 3-P
Titleist Vokey 56.14Cleveland CG12 60°Scotty Cameron Newport Two

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
Well, I was hitting the ball off the mat when this was happening and it was definitely an upward curve. I was sweeping the ball nicely without much, if any, contact with the mat. Contact was really solid. My swing felt about as flat as it ever has. I fight the tendency to take the club back outside, so I definitely know what a steep swing feels like.

Just to clarify, I meant flat through the hitting area, I didn't mean your entire swing should be flat. Through the hitting area with your longer clubs, but particularly your 3W, driver, etc., most prefer a shallow arc, not a steeply descending blow like you might have with a mid-iron.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 6478 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Who freaking cares about Tom Watson here? Why do you keep talking about ONE other dude, who overlapped Jack less than you seem to realize? We've been over this: Tiger's 82 PGA Tour wins were against significantly stronger fields than any of Jack's major (or regular) PGA Tour victories. That's what I call "accomplishing more." I don't care if Tiger (or Jack) finished T9 at something. What I wrote is not absurd, because I value Tiger's victories as more difficult than Jack's. Just as I would if, say, Scottie Scheffler gets to 11 or 12 majors in his career. You've now earned your timeout. I'm not a fan of repeating myself or discussing things with the intellectually dishonest.
    • Tom Watson's peak ability possibilty surpasses Jack. He won 6 PGA Tour    No he did not. That is factually false. Just on the face, what you just wrote should immediately seem absurd to you. You are golf pro. Have you not followed golf the last 15 years at all?  
    • Dude, for the umpteenth time now… Someone achieving less in more time is not a good argument. When he wasn't playing golf? Yeah, wow, what a statement! FFS, man. No, it isn't. Tiger won more PGA Tour events, each of which had stronger and deeper fields than any of the major victories Jack had. Jack played against (slightly exaggerating) ten year olds. Cool for him, easy way to rack up top tens, top threes, and wins. I don't care about that. Tiger set more strokes gained and scoring average records than Jack ever did, even over a LONGER period of time (if you want to keep pushing that, which is dumb). Ha, bull.
    • Wordle 1,057 4/6 🟨⬜🟨⬜⬜ ⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩 ⬜🟩🟨🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Jack's total output is way ahead.  Jack third and 1st in strokes gained at age 43 and 44.  If this were debated like baseball no one would think Tiger is the GOAT.  When I looked up Jack's 83 and 84 strokes gained,  he had 14 top 10s in 28 events in just those two years he was "non-existent". (And he had 15 the two years before that and won two majors three years before)  I was curious to see how many top 10s Tiger has had since 2014.  He has had 13 top 10s in a decade.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...