IGNORED
The Ryder Cup...Do the players really care?
Note: This thread is 5667 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!
-
Topics Being Discussed Right Now on The Sand Trap
-
- 0 replies
- 21 views
-
- 7,184 replies
- 1,009,565 views
-
- 0 replies
- 11 views
-
"5 Minutes Daily" Practice Challenge 1 2 3 4 1038
By iacas, in Instruction and Playing Tips
- 5 minutes daily
- dedication
- (and 6 more)
- 18,676 replies
- 1,941,915 views
-
- 19 replies
- 2,048 views
-
Announcements
-
TST Partners
Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.
Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code). -
Posts
-
By MentalityJohn · Posted
Are these course getting easier? are the players getting better? should we not worry about tournaments that used to produce single digit winners are now producing course records year after year. I am not talking roll back I am just curious why scores are so much lower than five to ten years ago. -
By Golfnutgalen · Posted
I've posted plenty of positive things about Tiger over the years. I just like to play fair. But if you want to see me praise TW some more here you go: 12 wins by 7 shots or more - Jack had 4 3 separate win streaks of 5 or more in a row - Jack won 3 in a row once It took Jack 172 more events and 9 extra years to reach Tiger's 71 wins by 2009 TW is the only player since 1900 to win a major by double digits and he did it twice 30% peak win rate is even higher than the previous record holder Ben Hogan (25%) 11 time PGA Tour Player of the year - Jack had 5 12 times lead the Tour in wins - Jack 6 10 times money list leader - Jack 8 Jack officially has 73 wins, but 2 of them are team wins with Arnie. You could argue he should be listed with 71 and I wouldn't disagree. -
By Golfnutgalen · Posted
I mean that's clearly an opinion. The funny thing is I never even attacked Tiger, I just pointed out that the other poster had a point when he mentioned that Jack had a longer career. Tiger basically had 5 years when he could have been winning more tournaments if not for his injuries. 2010-2011 and then again 2015-2017. Hard to make the argument after his final win because not many players win a ton after age 43. If those numbers support the fact that Jack had a longer career so be it. Don't take that as an affront to Tiger. -
By Foghorn Leghorn · Posted
Just getting back into golf after a 30 year break from the game. Hoping to get some advice and insight on becoming a decent player. Right now I'd be hard pressed to break 95 -
By boogielicious · Posted
Even injured Tiger had a more impressive career than Jack against much stiffer competition. This was confirmed by Jack quite a few times. You want to ignore that, but it’s fact.
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now