Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2946 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know, this is a topic straight out of 2006/2007, but I scored one of these cheap on eBay and wanted to give some thoughts on it.

First off, I used to be a big Titleist guy years ago.  In high school its all I played, starting with DCI golds and a 975D.  The ballflight was superb and those irons were forgiving...actually I still have them in the basement...sorry thats a bit off topic.

Anyway, I drifted away from the game for a few years in college, and when I started playing again I invested in some more 'game improvement' clubs, since the ballstriking wasn't what it used to be and I didn't practice.  The last few years I've been working harder on my game and I'm down below a 10hcp, and worked my hook/draw into a nice high fade.  A high fade to the point that with my R7 Limited (9.5) I was losing about 15-20 yards because too much spin and too high a launch angle.  I know Titleist is better for the penetrating ball flight and workability, so after a bit of research I decided to look into a 905 series.

It sets up alot like my old 975, but the deeper face and slightly larger clubhead are much more pleasing to my eye, especially in the era of 460cc monsters.  Some reviews said it looked small-ish, but I don't necessarily agree.  It definitely instills confidence over the ball, looks sleek and powerful.

Only took about 3 swings to know I made a good decision.  The ball comes off hotter and more penetrating, even with a fade.  In comparison to the TaylorMade, it flattens out much earlier and carries as far, if not further, and with much more roll.  In Nebraska where the wind is always a factor, this is a much more suitable ballflight for me.  I was even able to turn over a couple draws, and it still maintains good carry and the flatter, more penetrating flight.

The feel is alot different than the TM.  Very solid feel and plenty of feedback.  The solid feel and sound at impact are different than those off of the TM, I think the TM feels more springy while the 905 feels hotter at impact.  The 905's deeper face is a plus, usually my misses are high/low on the face more than heel/toe, so I can see the benefit there. I did hit a couple off the toe and didn't notice a huge distance loss, but the club lets you know you didn't strike it well.

I've never been on a launch monitor, so I don't have any super-techy numbers to validate the review, but I'm positive my launch is down, and I can tell the spin rate is down because the ball never ballooned.  I had no trouble carrying the ball 240-250 and will have a nice rollout.

Hopefully looking to upgrade to a 910 down the road, but if this one keeps working out like it is that may be a year or two.  For a 4-5 year old driver, I feel like this will really aid my driving of the golf ball.  Trajectory control and spin control are A+.


Posted

I just bought a 905R off of eBay, and am EXTREMELY pleased.  I also play a ~'99 TM Burner Ti and an ~'00 TM Firesole, and now rank them 1, 2, 3 respectively.

The 905 has given me probably 25 yards in my drive, and I didn't lose any accuracy.


Posted

I owned the Titleist 905s back in 2006 with the Aldila NV-65 Stiff green-colored shaft.  I found that it was about 10 yards shorter in distance than my Cleveland Launcher 460 driver with the same shaft.  The 905s is a beautiful looking driver but it is lacking in distance and "spring" on the face.  I had the 8.5 degree model.   It may have been more like 15 yards shorter.  My playing partners noticed immediately that i was hitting it shorter and after 4 rounds they called me crazy for not going back to the Cleveland.  I hit the Callaway Diablo Edge Tour today.  I'm a 5 handicap...for reference.


  • 6 years later...
Posted

What a coincidence!   I just bought one on ebay a few days ago on a whim.   I'm always excited to speculate on old equipment being better.   and I'm interested if a smaller head will go faster. 

I was initially interested because people are still so positive about the 905r. when I found out it had a low spin cousin,  I was in.

 

if anyone is interested in low spin gems from the past,   the callaway razr hawk tour was amazing to me.   just don't heat for reshafting, the head will come apart 

 

 I'll come back in a week or two and leave an impression if I can find my way back here. 


Note: This thread is 2946 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.