Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5389 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi,

I need to write a essay on golf balls and surprisingly it is more difficult than I thought. Now, this is no normal essay, and is based on the physics of golf ball flight involving Bernoulli's principle, the Magnus effect, Reynolds number, drag coefficients etc. Now the reason I am telling you this is because I hit a dead end with the essay. The essay question is: What effect do dimples have on the aerodynamics of a golf ball? I realized calculating the drag coefficient for different speeds of the golf ball is more difficult than I thought. Here is the formula (Fd is the drag force):

F d = -C d v

where C d is the drag coefficient, v is the velocity of the ball and Fd is the drag force( v x, v y, v z are its components) and the minus sign means that this drag force opposes the ball's motion .

or

F d= 0.5 P v ² C d A

Where P is the density of the air, v is the velocity of the ball relative to the air, A is the cross-sectional area and Cd is the drag coefficient (the value to be found).

I am able to calculate Reynolds Number for different speeds, and plotting this against the drag coefficient I  should get a graph like this which was taken from the internet:
sphere-drag.gif

Here are my final questions:
How do I calculate the drag coefficient if I don't know the value of the drag force of the golf ball (Fd)? I believe this is not the same for different golf balls and at different speeds. I need to get a graph as shown above.


What else can I investigate? (I am doing the IB program which is slightly more advanced than high school, so it cannot be things like using a wind tunnel)

Should I change the title of my essay and investigate something else in relation to golf? (preferably using golf balls as I already bought several expensive ones)

Resources: I have dimpled and dimple-less golf balls and different golf clubs (experiment carried out in golf shop). The way I calculate data such as speed, rpm etc is by using this machine: http://www.golfachiever.com/Web/Technology/LaserTech/laser-tech.html


Posted

You have two equations and two unknowns. You just need to use them together to solve for Cd and Fd. So, since Fd = -Cd*V, that means -Cd*V = 0.5P*V^2*Cd*A. Once you solve that equation for Cd, you can then use that value to calculate Fd.

I don't really know what else you could investigate, but you seem to be on a pretty good track with this. Is this not going to yield enough information?

EDIT: I noticed after posting that if you go straight at it like that, Cd divides out. I didn't really think that one through. That obviously won't help you.


Posted
It's not the maths that is a difficulty (sorry if I was not clear), it is more about collecting the data for it. The drag force is what I have to find out. This is different for different balls and speeds. I provided the equations so that you understand what I need the drag force for. Apparently it can only be found out using a wind tunnel which I don't have.

Posted

Yeah, I can't think of any other way than using a wind tunnel. A couple guys I went to college with built one for a design project. It only cost them about $50, I believe. I don't know exactly what they did because I studied electrical engineering and they were in a mechanical class that I didn't take. But, knowing these guys, I just about guarantee the idea and, most likely, the design, came from somewhere around the internet. You could probably find something like that if that is a possibility for you. It would be perfect for your purposes. It was only about 2' x 1' x 1' or so.


Posted

I assume this is for your extended essay? (I was an IB student at one time as well).

Your graph provides some insight into reasons behind dimples. In general, turbulent flow means that drag is less on the ball. What the dimples do is reduce the "critical Reynolds number", which is basically the number at which flow over the object transitions from laminar to turbulent. At very high speeds, the drag coef. on the smooth ball is very low, because we are in the turbulent phase (the right side of the graph where the blue line dips). However, given the restrictions on how much velocity humans can impart on the ball, dimples are required to bring this critical number down.

Given your limited resources, how about investigating the way in which reynolds number changes with balls that claim to "improve distance"? You could talk about the properties of the ball that bring down the critical reynolds number in order to allow amateurs with low swing speeds to impart turbulent flow over the ball.

Driver 10.5 G10 Aldila NV Fairway:  15* Speedline Fast 10 Matrix Ozik

Hybrids 909H 19*,  SQ Machspeed 24*

Irons:  MP-53 5-PW PX5.5

Wedges Tw9 50.08  Rac Black 56.12,  Vokey 60.04

Putter Scotty Cameron Newport 2  Ball: One Tour


Posted

Also, callaway's new balls have hexagonal dimples. i dunno, those might produce a different graps compared to balls with circular ones.

Driver 10.5 G10 Aldila NV Fairway:  15* Speedline Fast 10 Matrix Ozik

Hybrids 909H 19*,  SQ Machspeed 24*

Irons:  MP-53 5-PW PX5.5

Wedges Tw9 50.08  Rac Black 56.12,  Vokey 60.04

Putter Scotty Cameron Newport 2  Ball: One Tour


Posted

Yea it is for my extended essay, and thanks for the explanation, clearer than what I found on the internet. I actually didnt make the graph myself, i need to produce one similar to it and that is what I am having difficulties with. Your question you provided also allows me to focus my extended essay a bit more. But the only thing that is concerning me is how to test and explain how different dimples have a different effect. The way the experiment is going to be carried out is by hitting the golf balls with a 7 iron (any suggestion for a different club) at different speeds. I will then calculate reynolds number. However to determine the critical reynolds number I also need the drag coef. which I can't calculate as I dont have the drag force for the golf ball.

Originally Posted by vikramraju

I assume this is for your extended essay? (I was an IB student at one time as well).

Your graph provides some insight into reasons behind dimples. In general, turbulent flow means that drag is less on the ball. What the dimples do is reduce the "critical Reynolds number", which is basically the number at which flow over the object transitions from laminar to turbulent. At very high speeds, the drag coef. on the smooth ball is very low, because we are in the turbulent phase (the right side of the graph where the blue line dips). However, given the restrictions on how much velocity humans can impart on the ball, dimples are required to bring this critical number down.

Given your limited resources, how about investigating the way in which reynolds number changes with balls that claim to "improve distance"? You could talk about the properties of the ball that bring down the critical reynolds number in order to allow amateurs with low swing speeds to impart turbulent flow over the ball.




Posted

Funny enough, I actually found one the other day on the course. I was examining the dimples and realized they were hexagonal. Thought I could use it for my essay.

Originally Posted by vikramraju

Also, callaway's new balls have hexagonal dimples. i dunno, those might produce a different graps compared to balls with circular ones.




Posted

Producing a wind tunnel is not optimal for my essay. I had a look and it takes too much time to build. I can then see the air flow on the golf balls however I will only get qualitative data then.

Originally Posted by rdwoody

Yeah, I can't think of any other way than using a wind tunnel. A couple guys I went to college with built one for a design project. It only cost them about $50, I believe. I don't know exactly what they did because I studied electrical engineering and they were in a mechanical class that I didn't take. But, knowing these guys, I just about guarantee the idea and, most likely, the design, came from somewhere around the internet. You could probably find something like that if that is a possibility for you. It would be perfect for your purposes. It was only about 2' x 1' x 1' or so.




Posted

That I can understand. The actual tunnel wasn't very expensive to build, but they did have some rather expensive instruments that allowed them to quantify what they were seeing. I didn't think about you probably not having access to instruments like that.

Originally Posted by Golfz

Producing a wind tunnel is not optimal for my essay. I had a look and it takes too much time to build. I can then see the air flow on the golf balls however I will only get qualitative data then.




Posted

Does the material in which a ball is made of have a significant impact on the flight of the ball, hence affecting reynolds number?


Posted

Different materials will either make the ball harder or softer. A harder ball allows for a more efficient transfer of energy from the club, therefore making it travel further. I've never seen a study on how that affects the flight (lift, drag, etc.), but it may be worth looking into. Personally, I don't think it would have a really significant effect, but I can't say for sure.


Note: This thread is 5389 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I would think of it in terms of time. The time it takes to get the arm angle into a good position to deliver the club with proper shaft lean. Another component is rotation, but that is also a matter of timing. It relates to how the body stalls to give the golfer time to hit the ball. If you have to get 80+ degrees out of that right elbow in one third of a second versus 50 degrees in the same time then you have to steal time from somewhere. It is usually body rotation. That does not help with shaft lean.  I agree in that amateurs tend to make the swing more complicated than pro golfers. 
    • I haven't been able to practice like I wanted and won't for the next week.  1. The weather sucks in Ohio this year. I have been mostly inside hitting foam balls. Just kind of my basic stuff.  2. I woke up last Saturday with a left side rib muscle on fire. If I turned or leaned a certain way it would spasm that almost buckled my knees. I have been taking a break to let that settle. I don't want to get a long term injury. I think I pinched a nerve or just aggravated a muscles.   3. I am going on a mini-vacation to Florida (screw you Ohio weather) with a friend, and rolling that into a work conference I have next week. I will be with out my clubs for a week.  I will be back next in two Fridays to hit the ground running with some warmer temps and better weather in Ohio, hopefully. I would really like to get more out on the course and the range.     
    • Day 580 - 2026-05-04 Played eight holes. Sometimes golf kicks you in the nuts. 😉 
    • I work with a lot of golfers who want more shaft lean at impact, who currently have AoAs that range from +2° to -2°, and who love to see the handle lower and more "in front of their trail thigh" from face-on at P6. And a lot of these golfers try to solve the issue by working on the downswing. They do something to drag the handle forward. Or they just leave their right thigh farther back so the same handle location "looks" farther forward. Or they move the ball back in their stance. Or they push themselves down into the ground to get the handle lower and increase (decrease?) their AoA (to be more negative). The real fix is often to get wider in the backswing. To do LESS in the backswing. To hinge less, fold the trail arm less, abduct the trail arm less. I had a case of this over the weekend. Before, the player had 110° of trail elbow bend, "lifted" his trail humerus only a few degrees, etc. The club traveled quite a bit around him, and he tended to "pick" the ball from the fairways. In the "after" swings below (which are mild exaggerations — this golfer does not need to end up at < 70° of elbow bend. These were slower backswings with "hit it as hard as you normally would" intent downswings), you can see that he bent his elbow about 70° instead of 110° and lifted his right arm an extra ~15° or more. You can't see how much less this moved his hands across his chest (right arm abduction), but it was also decreased. His hands stayed more "in front of" his right shoulder rather than traveling "beside" them so much. The two swings look like this: The change at P6, without talking about the downswing one little bit (outside of him telling me that he tends to pick the ball), is remarkable: Without 110° of elbow bend to get out (which he gets to 80°, a loss of 30°), the golfer actually loses slightly less elbow bend (70 - 50 = 20), but delivers 30° less elbow bend, lowering the handle and letting the elbow get "in front of" the rib cage… because it never got "behind" or "beside" the rib cage. If you look at this video showing the before/afters of P6, you'll note the handle location (both vertically and horizontally) and the shoulders (the ball is in the same place in these frames). This golfer's path was largely unaffected (still pretty straight into the ball, < 3° path and often < 1.5°), but his AoA jumped to -5° ± 2°. I've always said, and in talking with other instructors they agree and feel similarly, that we spend a lot of time working on the backswing. This is another example of why.
    • We had a member of our senior club who developed a mental block on pulling the trigger. I played with him to see what the membership was talking about. I timed him a few times when he would get over the ball. 45 seconds. He knew he had a mental block and would chide himself, “Just hit it!” Once on the green he was okay and chipping was a bit better. It was painful to watch him struggle. Our “bandaid” was to put him in the last tournament  tee time with two understanding players. We should have suggested to him to take a break from our tournaments. I agree with the idea that when a player realizes they have a problem, the answer is to go fix it and not return until they are able to play at an acceptable pace.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.