905R vs 907D2

[hypergolf]

Both these two drivers are great but I find that 905R seems to have a better sound, feel, performance. control and distance despite people saying that 907s are better... Is it just me or most people feel the same?

[rusek]

  hypergolf said:

Both these two drivers are great but I find that 905R seems to have a better sound, feel, performance. control and distance despite people saying that 907s are better... Is it just me or most people feel the same?

This year I was looking for a new driver and the first one I bough/tried was a 905T. It was much nicer than my R7, but ultimately I got rid of it. When I went to demo new clubs, I hit Both 907s, a Hibore XL, FT-5, FT-i, Sumo, SUmo2, and a Superquad. The sumo2 that I tried was the best for me. The shaft really played a large part, also. It is a great Aldila VS-Proto 65-S, but anyways, I really did not like the new Titleists, and actually preferred the 905T I got used for $90 to the new 907s.

[Ed_Vaderr]

I owned a 905r for about a year and half now and went to a demo day one day to try the new 907's D1, D2 it was no surprise to me that the D1 was easy to hit , I specially loved the penetrating ball flight but I loved d2's workability . So anyway I went to my local Golfsmith and purchased a Titleist D2 and this was 2 moths ago , for some reason Im finding it much easier to hit my old 907r than my new D2 . The biggest thing to me is workabilty because the local golf club I usually play at has to many dog-rights and dog-left in thier course design , but Im sure it wont be long till I can exclusively start trusting the D2. So I agree with you Hypergolf 905R's are much workable for me but the low to medium lunch angle of the 907 is very promising . Both driver have the same Fujikura X-Stiff and for some reason 905 has a higher lunch angle for me while they are both at 9.5 degrees.