Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4163 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi Hogan-fans,

how does an Apex 5 x stiff shaft from 1998 (on Apex 1999) play compared to up-to-date stiff shafts? Should be a shaft Spalding made or bought...

I currently practice with Apex 4 shafts on clubs from 1988 and my 6i travels the same distance than the stronger lofted 2006 Apex 3 6i.

Is x stiff from 1998 todays stiff? Like the old 7i loft is todays 8i loft?

And yes, I do not know my swing speed...


  • 1 month later...
Posted

Here we are again with data for the 6 iron from a TrackMan Range, hit about 10 each with heavy range balls at -2 degrees C (25 F). Distance is completely off, due to range balls, but Pro tells me that the spin should be close to the real values. Hit club no. 1 not that good in the beginning.

Club 1: Apex Redline (1988), steel stiff shaft Apex 4, 33,5 degrees

Club 2: Apex Blade (1999), steel x stiff shaft Spalding Apex 5, 32,5 degrees

Club 3: Apex 50th (2003), steel Rifle Flighted 6.0 shaft, 32,5 degrees

Club 4: Apex ftx (2006), steel regular shaft Apex 3, 30 degrees

According to these stats, would the club 2 shaft be my choice?


  • 9 months later...
Posted

Hollister very interesting, I've a set of 99s and IIs both apex 4 shafts. What's urge opinion on the apex 4 shafts. I hit the 99s very high, I did have set of FTX 4 shafts hit them very low, when took the grip of IIs found this there's only about 1/4 inch longer than standard. 6 iron for me is about 170. I'm just thinking its actually the head rather than the shafts don't want to mess with them if makes no difference.


Posted

Ah, another Hogan fan. Great!

The guy who sold the 99s to me said, that the Apex 5 shaft does play more like a stiff shaft (or even less). Comparing the TrackMan numbers you see that the Apex 5 hit balls have the highest trajectory (see height and landing angle).

And yes to the club heads. I always thought that the FTX were more for mid to low handicappers should fly a little higher, but they do not. Next time I take the 7i FTX with 34 degrees of loft.

Regarding the numbers, I will try it again in the next days. I could be that I did not hit the balls that good with a winter parka on, it was freezing back then. See dispersion? I might not have hit the ball high enough on the club face from the frozen mats.

I am a pretty average golfer and am getting about 148 yards in carry from a 6i, roll depending on the course condition.


Posted
Hi thanks for getting back. See photo attached,all 3 irons II one stiff one reg TM are s300 CFT is apex 4 blue tape backs the first step. CFT and 99s have different step pattern. What I'm think is there must be a kick point in a shaft somewhere and the closer to the head the less affect on the face.

Posted

Photo is missing...

I had a look at the steps of my clubs - they differ in height. That design would allow to move the kick-point higher or lower. Higher kick-point results in a higher ball trajectory. So, one has to figure who made the shafts in order to compare them (Royal Precision was a long running OEM fitter).

Somewhere I read that Hogan Apex shafts from 1988 and earlier were known to have a lower kick-point than comparable shafts.


Posted
Doesn't seem to like it when I try upload the picture will try from laptop tomorrow, I was hitting the apex II and 99s in the range yesterday, the IIs have been trimmed and this fancy towel in the top to be honest both go same hight but 99s I'd say 5 yard further. I,m very hesitant to pull them out could I'm sure some testing would have been done to optimise the shaft, why go to all that trouble in designing then put in a shaft which doesn't suit

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Here is a photo of the clubs in the same order I hit them at the range with the TrackMan Range. The golf ball marks the last shaft step.

Club 1: Apex Redline (1988), steel stiff shaft Apex 4, 33,5 degrees

Club 2: Apex Blade (1999), steel x stiff shaft Spalding Apex 5, 32,5 degrees

Club 3: Apex 50th (2003), steel Rifle Flighted 6.0 shaft, 32,5 degrees (no steps, flighted)

Club 4: Apex ftx (2006), steel regular shaft Apex 3, 30 degrees

Club 5: Apex 50th (2003), steel regular shaft Apex 3, 32,5 degrees

Easy to see: stiffer Apex shafts are stepped further down to tip.

I hit the ftx last week and compared it to the Apex 50th (club 4 vs. club 5). The ball flight of the latter is way, way higher. Either the shafts differ in performance or the head itself. Maybe the golfer, too, but I made sure by vigorously switching clubs..


Posted

Took those four to the range today and see, how the rifle flighted shaft would compare to the regular (clubs 1+2)

Club 1: Apex 50th (2003), steel Rifle Flighted 6.0 shaft, 32,5 degrees (27 balls)

Club 2: Apex 50th (2003), steel regular shaft Apex 3, 32,5 degrees (14 balls)

Club 3: Apex Redline (1988), steel stiff shaft Apex 4, 33,5 degrees (17 balls)

Club 4: Apex ftx (2006), steel regular shaft Apex 3, 30 degrees (20 balls)

As if I was waiting for it - 2 degrees C (25 F), but new range balls. And wind into the boxes. Wind-chill is overrated when you try to murder the range stone trying to keep worm. At least the ball speeds were 10mph compared to last year, don't look at dispersion, side spin, etc. Been hitting

So, these results are just relative to each other - compare the performance of the club/shaft.

The performance of club 3, the Apex Redline blade from 88, amazes me. Feel-wise, I mishit it a couple of times. Compared to the other clubs the 6i  has a lower loft - I should have taken the 30 degrees 5i to match the loft.

Compared to the Apex 50, the FTX feels harsh or hard when you hit the ball, more like mishitting the Apex Redline. A pitty that I consider the new FTX to be my gamers. I did test the regular graphite shafted Apex Edge from 2001 again these clubs and it did well back then. Might try it next time again.

I was about the sell the rifle flighted shafted clubs (club 2 is a lonely 6i, not a set). But hey, next round I take my would-love-to-make-em gamers, the Apex 99s with me. So far I did not dare to think I am able to hit the Apex 5 x-stiff shaft well enough.

Ahh, that was fun. Winter could be soooo boring :D


Posted
I got a set of 06 apex with DGS300, they are really nice to hit, I would say maybe a little easier than the 99s, but don't look as nice, little more offset there actually very similar to the apex IIs, as far as offset and flange. Shall be bored out for the the fujikura r11 graphites, if it goes wrong have a set of KSB steel shafts to put into. The ftx are only for windy days, have u ever tried the Hogan hybrids there very very good

Posted

After a good nights sleep and looking-up the Rifle Flighted 6.0 shaft-flex, which equals a stiff or even stiff+, I do not really understand the correlation of shaft flex and performance of my particular sticks anymore. A too stiff shaft should let me leave ball short (or right?) when not having the appropriate swing speed. A too weak shaft should lead to ballooning balls, as I saw with my regular graphite shafts. Or lead to over-draws?

Clueless. Maybe I should go and get fit for a set...

  tooc said:

I got a set of 06 apex with DGS300, they are really nice to hit, I would say maybe a little easier than the 99s, but don't look as nice, little more offset there actually very similar to the apex IIs, as far as offset and flange. Shall be bored out for the the fujikura r11 graphites, if it goes wrong have a set of KSB steel shafts to put into. The ftx are only for windy days, have u ever tried the Hogan hybrids there very very good

FTX for windy days? That would be a luxury problem I'd like to avoid. I go test a higher trajectory ball next time on the course. Or get the shaft measured. Or do the fall into the c

I have a 2 and 3 Hogan CFT ti hybrid with the stock stiff shaft, but I did not dare to take them to the course. Compared to my regular Taylor Made Burner 07 hybrids, they sound a little too dull for my taste, feel harsh and are way harder to hit properly. Struck well, they perform well, but sound unexpected for a hybrid.


Note: This thread is 4163 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • The bold is very late.
    • Angle isn't perfect. Just found my TST alignment stick, so will make sure video angles are better in future videos. Focus right now is lower body and lower body only. If I make a single post here for the foreseeable future about anything NOT lower body focused, I need to be slapped (I will make an occasional note on unrelated stuff I might be seeing). It's not perfect by any means, but there is a decent bit I like about this swing. Lower body is definitely better than it was pre-TST meetup instruction. There are some things that are tough to see I think I'm doing better like where pressure is going into the trail foot and keeping that trail hip internally rotated. Need to keep feeling those. I think I do my best work when the trail leg keeps its flex on the backswing or at most loses a degree. Keeping the flex (but obviously not adding any) seems to help feel like I'm loading the right glute and to keep the hip internally rotated. Not totally sold on this though. I think my work on adding flow during the TST COVID-19 lessons really helped even though its been quite some time. Shift -> rotate -> shift -> rotate. I just need more out of my hips. It's not drastic, but it's everything. I think it will help sync up a lot regarding my swing and more power to boot. Unrelated note: I hate my negative spine angle.
    • Day 3 - mirror swings/drills after my workout. Two seemingly good feels for me: feel like as the club reaches the top the weight of it/momentum of it pointing left initiates my "fall" into the lead side. Helps initiate the re-centering and some of the pressure shift. The second feel is like: as soon as the re-centering is over, begin to lighten the trail foot by feeling like my right knee in the beginning of the downswing essentially replaces where my left knee was at the top. This helps halt my sometimes ludicrous slide and greatly helps me get open.
    • Day 48 (17 Jun 25) - Into the net work today with the 5i - focus remains on the setup and proper weight shift.  Was not a perfect session as several were very heavy along with a couple of thin boys.  Finished up the day with a few pitches with the 52 (last set of 5 hitting to about 40 yds had 4 of the 5 in a 5’ circle (now if I could just do that on the course) - the errant one was a total mishit).  
    • Day 260 - 2025-06-17 Played seven holes before it started thundering and then raining. Some good. Simpler.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...