Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4343 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi Hogan-fans,

how does an Apex 5 x stiff shaft from 1998 (on Apex 1999) play compared to up-to-date stiff shafts? Should be a shaft Spalding made or bought...

I currently practice with Apex 4 shafts on clubs from 1988 and my 6i travels the same distance than the stronger lofted 2006 Apex 3 6i.

Is x stiff from 1998 todays stiff? Like the old 7i loft is todays 8i loft?

And yes, I do not know my swing speed...


  • 1 month later...
Posted

Here we are again with data for the 6 iron from a TrackMan Range, hit about 10 each with heavy range balls at -2 degrees C (25 F). Distance is completely off, due to range balls, but Pro tells me that the spin should be close to the real values. Hit club no. 1 not that good in the beginning.

Club 1: Apex Redline (1988), steel stiff shaft Apex 4, 33,5 degrees

Club 2: Apex Blade (1999), steel x stiff shaft Spalding Apex 5, 32,5 degrees

Club 3: Apex 50th (2003), steel Rifle Flighted 6.0 shaft, 32,5 degrees

Club 4: Apex ftx (2006), steel regular shaft Apex 3, 30 degrees

According to these stats, would the club 2 shaft be my choice?


  • 9 months later...
Posted

Hollister very interesting, I've a set of 99s and IIs both apex 4 shafts. What's urge opinion on the apex 4 shafts. I hit the 99s very high, I did have set of FTX 4 shafts hit them very low, when took the grip of IIs found this there's only about 1/4 inch longer than standard. 6 iron for me is about 170. I'm just thinking its actually the head rather than the shafts don't want to mess with them if makes no difference.


Posted

Ah, another Hogan fan. Great!

The guy who sold the 99s to me said, that the Apex 5 shaft does play more like a stiff shaft (or even less). Comparing the TrackMan numbers you see that the Apex 5 hit balls have the highest trajectory (see height and landing angle).

And yes to the club heads. I always thought that the FTX were more for mid to low handicappers should fly a little higher, but they do not. Next time I take the 7i FTX with 34 degrees of loft.

Regarding the numbers, I will try it again in the next days. I could be that I did not hit the balls that good with a winter parka on, it was freezing back then. See dispersion? I might not have hit the ball high enough on the club face from the frozen mats.

I am a pretty average golfer and am getting about 148 yards in carry from a 6i, roll depending on the course condition.


Posted
Hi thanks for getting back. See photo attached,all 3 irons II one stiff one reg TM are s300 CFT is apex 4 blue tape backs the first step. CFT and 99s have different step pattern. What I'm think is there must be a kick point in a shaft somewhere and the closer to the head the less affect on the face.

Posted

Photo is missing...

I had a look at the steps of my clubs - they differ in height. That design would allow to move the kick-point higher or lower. Higher kick-point results in a higher ball trajectory. So, one has to figure who made the shafts in order to compare them (Royal Precision was a long running OEM fitter).

Somewhere I read that Hogan Apex shafts from 1988 and earlier were known to have a lower kick-point than comparable shafts.


Posted
Doesn't seem to like it when I try upload the picture will try from laptop tomorrow, I was hitting the apex II and 99s in the range yesterday, the IIs have been trimmed and this fancy towel in the top to be honest both go same hight but 99s I'd say 5 yard further. I,m very hesitant to pull them out could I'm sure some testing would have been done to optimise the shaft, why go to all that trouble in designing then put in a shaft which doesn't suit

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Here is a photo of the clubs in the same order I hit them at the range with the TrackMan Range. The golf ball marks the last shaft step.

Club 1: Apex Redline (1988), steel stiff shaft Apex 4, 33,5 degrees

Club 2: Apex Blade (1999), steel x stiff shaft Spalding Apex 5, 32,5 degrees

Club 3: Apex 50th (2003), steel Rifle Flighted 6.0 shaft, 32,5 degrees (no steps, flighted)

Club 4: Apex ftx (2006), steel regular shaft Apex 3, 30 degrees

Club 5: Apex 50th (2003), steel regular shaft Apex 3, 32,5 degrees

Easy to see: stiffer Apex shafts are stepped further down to tip.

I hit the ftx last week and compared it to the Apex 50th (club 4 vs. club 5). The ball flight of the latter is way, way higher. Either the shafts differ in performance or the head itself. Maybe the golfer, too, but I made sure by vigorously switching clubs..


Posted

Took those four to the range today and see, how the rifle flighted shaft would compare to the regular (clubs 1+2)

Club 1: Apex 50th (2003), steel Rifle Flighted 6.0 shaft, 32,5 degrees (27 balls)

Club 2: Apex 50th (2003), steel regular shaft Apex 3, 32,5 degrees (14 balls)

Club 3: Apex Redline (1988), steel stiff shaft Apex 4, 33,5 degrees (17 balls)

Club 4: Apex ftx (2006), steel regular shaft Apex 3, 30 degrees (20 balls)

As if I was waiting for it - 2 degrees C (25 F), but new range balls. And wind into the boxes. Wind-chill is overrated when you try to murder the range stone trying to keep worm. At least the ball speeds were 10mph compared to last year, don't look at dispersion, side spin, etc. Been hitting

So, these results are just relative to each other - compare the performance of the club/shaft.

The performance of club 3, the Apex Redline blade from 88, amazes me. Feel-wise, I mishit it a couple of times. Compared to the other clubs the 6i  has a lower loft - I should have taken the 30 degrees 5i to match the loft.

Compared to the Apex 50, the FTX feels harsh or hard when you hit the ball, more like mishitting the Apex Redline. A pitty that I consider the new FTX to be my gamers. I did test the regular graphite shafted Apex Edge from 2001 again these clubs and it did well back then. Might try it next time again.

I was about the sell the rifle flighted shafted clubs (club 2 is a lonely 6i, not a set). But hey, next round I take my would-love-to-make-em gamers, the Apex 99s with me. So far I did not dare to think I am able to hit the Apex 5 x-stiff shaft well enough.

Ahh, that was fun. Winter could be soooo boring :D


Posted
I got a set of 06 apex with DGS300, they are really nice to hit, I would say maybe a little easier than the 99s, but don't look as nice, little more offset there actually very similar to the apex IIs, as far as offset and flange. Shall be bored out for the the fujikura r11 graphites, if it goes wrong have a set of KSB steel shafts to put into. The ftx are only for windy days, have u ever tried the Hogan hybrids there very very good

Posted

After a good nights sleep and looking-up the Rifle Flighted 6.0 shaft-flex, which equals a stiff or even stiff+, I do not really understand the correlation of shaft flex and performance of my particular sticks anymore. A too stiff shaft should let me leave ball short (or right?) when not having the appropriate swing speed. A too weak shaft should lead to ballooning balls, as I saw with my regular graphite shafts. Or lead to over-draws?

Clueless. Maybe I should go and get fit for a set...

I got a set of 06 apex with DGS300, they are really nice to hit, I would say maybe a little easier than the 99s, but don't look as nice, little more offset there actually very similar to the apex IIs, as far as offset and flange. Shall be bored out for the the fujikura r11 graphites, if it goes wrong have a set of KSB steel shafts to put into. The ftx are only for windy days, have u ever tried the Hogan hybrids there very very good

FTX for windy days? That would be a luxury problem I'd like to avoid. I go test a higher trajectory ball next time on the course. Or get the shaft measured. Or do the fall into the c

I have a 2 and 3 Hogan CFT ti hybrid with the stock stiff shaft, but I did not dare to take them to the course. Compared to my regular Taylor Made Burner 07 hybrids, they sound a little too dull for my taste, feel harsh and are way harder to hit properly. Struck well, they perform well, but sound unexpected for a hybrid.


Note: This thread is 4343 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I am semi-loyal. Usually buy four dozen of one ball and only play that until out and then determine whether to continue or try another one. Since starting my semi-loyal path to success, I've been playing the below, not in order: ProV1 ProV1x ProV1x left dash AVX Bridgestone BXS Srixon Z-star XV I am not sure if it has helped anything, but it gives a bit of confidence knowing that it at least is not the ball (while using the same one) that gives different results so one thing less to mind about I guess. On the level that I am, not sure whether it makes much difference but will continue since I have to play something so might as well go with the same ball for a number of rounds. Edit: favorite is probably the BXS followed by ProV1/Srixon Z-star XV. Haven't got any numbers to back it up but just by feel.  
    • Will not do it by myself, going to the pro shop I usually use after Cristmas for input and actually doing the changes, if any, but wanted to get some thoughts on whether this was worthwhile out of curiosity. 
    • In terms of ball striking, not really. Ball striking being how good you are at hitting the center of the clubface with the swing path you want and the loft you want to present at impact.  In terms of getting better launch conditions for the current swing you have, it is debatable.  It depends on how you swing and what your current launch conditions are at. These are fine tuning mechanisms not significant changes. They might not even be the correct fine tuning you need. I would go spend the $100 to $150 dollars in getting a club fitting over potentially wasting money on changes that ChatGPT gave you.  New grips are important. Yes, it can affect swing weight, but it is personal preference. Swing weight is just one component.  Overall weight effects the feel. The type of golf shaft effects the feel of the club in the swing. Swing weight effects the feel. You can add so much extra weight to get the swing weight correct and it will feel completely different because the total weight went up. Imagine swinging a 5lb stick versus a 15lb stick. They could be balanced the same (swing weight), but one will take substantially more effort to move.  I would almost say swing weight is an old school way of fitting clubs. Now, with launch monitors, you could just fit the golfer. You could have two golfers with the same swing speed that want completely different swing weight. It is just personal preference. You can only tell that by swinging a golf club.     
    • Thanks for the comments. I fully understand that these changes won't make any big difference compared to getting a flawless swing but looking to give myself the best chance of success at where I am and hopefully lessons will improve the swing along the way. Can these changes make minor improvements to ball striking and misses then that's fine. From what I understood about changing the grips, which is to avoid them slipping in warm and humid conditions, is that it will affect the swing weight since midsize are heavier than regular and so therefore adding weight to the club head would be required to avoid a change of feel in the club compared to before? 
    • I think part of it is there hasn't been enough conclusive studies specific to golf regarding block studies. Maybe the full swing, you can't study it because it is too complicated and to some degree it will fall into variable or random.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.