• Announcements

    • iacas

      Introducing TST "Clubs!"   08/28/2017

      No, we're not getting into the equipment business, but we do have "clubs" here on TST now. Groups. Check them out here:
Sign in to follow this  
Hollister

Hogan Apex 5 shafts on 1998 Apex clubs

Recommended Posts

Hollister    3

Hi Hogan-fans,

how does an Apex 5 x stiff shaft from 1998 (on Apex 1999) play compared to up-to-date stiff shafts? Should be a shaft Spalding made or bought...

I currently practice with Apex 4 shafts on clubs from 1988 and my 6i travels the same distance than the stronger lofted 2006 Apex 3 6i.

Is x stiff from 1998 todays stiff? Like the old 7i loft is todays 8i loft?

And yes, I do not know my swing speed...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Hollister    3

Here we are again with data for the 6 iron from a TrackMan Range, hit about 10 each with heavy range balls at -2 degrees C (25 F). Distance is completely off, due to range balls, but Pro tells me that the spin should be close to the real values. Hit club no. 1 not that good in the beginning.

Club 1: Apex Redline (1988), steel stiff shaft Apex 4, 33,5 degrees

Club 2: Apex Blade (1999), steel x stiff shaft Spalding Apex 5, 32,5 degrees

Club 3: Apex 50th (2003), steel Rifle Flighted 6.0 shaft, 32,5 degrees

Club 4: Apex ftx (2006), steel regular shaft Apex 3, 30 degrees

According to these stats, would the club 2 shaft be my choice?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

tooc    2
Hollister very interesting, I've a set of 99s and IIs both apex 4 shafts. What's urge opinion on the apex 4 shafts. I hit the 99s very high, I did have set of FTX 4 shafts hit them very low, when took the grip of IIs found this there's only about 1/4 inch longer than standard. 6 iron for me is about 170. I'm just thinking its actually the head rather than the shafts don't want to mess with them if makes no difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hollister    3

Ah, another Hogan fan. Great!

The guy who sold the 99s to me said, that the Apex 5 shaft does play more like a stiff shaft (or even less). Comparing the TrackMan numbers you see that the Apex 5 hit balls have the highest trajectory (see height and landing angle).

And yes to the club heads. I always thought that the FTX were more for mid to low handicappers should fly a little higher, but they do not. Next time I take the 7i FTX with 34 degrees of loft.

Regarding the numbers, I will try it again in the next days. I could be that I did not hit the balls that good with a winter parka on, it was freezing back then. See dispersion? I might not have hit the ball high enough on the club face from the frozen mats.

I am a pretty average golfer and am getting about 148 yards in carry from a 6i, roll depending on the course condition.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

tooc    2
Hi thanks for getting back. See photo attached,all 3 irons II one stiff one reg TM are s300 CFT is apex 4 blue tape backs the first step. CFT and 99s have different step pattern. What I'm think is there must be a kick point in a shaft somewhere and the closer to the head the less affect on the face.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hollister    3

Photo is missing...

I had a look at the steps of my clubs - they differ in height. That design would allow to move the kick-point higher or lower. Higher kick-point results in a higher ball trajectory. So, one has to figure who made the shafts in order to compare them (Royal Precision was a long running OEM fitter).

Somewhere I read that Hogan Apex shafts from 1988 and earlier were known to have a lower kick-point than comparable shafts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

tooc    2
Doesn't seem to like it when I try upload the picture will try from laptop tomorrow, I was hitting the apex II and 99s in the range yesterday, the IIs have been trimmed and this fancy towel in the top to be honest both go same hight but 99s I'd say 5 yard further. I,m very hesitant to pull them out could I'm sure some testing would have been done to optimise the shaft, why go to all that trouble in designing then put in a shaft which doesn't suit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hollister    3

Here is a photo of the clubs in the same order I hit them at the range with the TrackMan Range. The golf ball marks the last shaft step.

Club 1: Apex Redline (1988), steel stiff shaft Apex 4, 33,5 degrees

Club 2: Apex Blade (1999), steel x stiff shaft Spalding Apex 5, 32,5 degrees

Club 3: Apex 50th (2003), steel Rifle Flighted 6.0 shaft, 32,5 degrees (no steps, flighted)

Club 4: Apex ftx (2006), steel regular shaft Apex 3, 30 degrees

Club 5: Apex 50th (2003), steel regular shaft Apex 3, 32,5 degrees

Easy to see: stiffer Apex shafts are stepped further down to tip.

I hit the ftx last week and compared it to the Apex 50th (club 4 vs. club 5). The ball flight of the latter is way, way higher. Either the shafts differ in performance or the head itself. Maybe the golfer, too, but I made sure by vigorously switching clubs..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hollister    3

Took those four to the range today and see, how the rifle flighted shaft would compare to the regular (clubs 1+2)

Club 1: Apex 50th (2003), steel Rifle Flighted 6.0 shaft, 32,5 degrees (27 balls)

Club 2: Apex 50th (2003), steel regular shaft Apex 3, 32,5 degrees (14 balls)

Club 3: Apex Redline (1988), steel stiff shaft Apex 4, 33,5 degrees (17 balls)

Club 4: Apex ftx (2006), steel regular shaft Apex 3, 30 degrees (20 balls)

As if I was waiting for it - 2 degrees C (25 F), but new range balls. And wind into the boxes. Wind-chill is overrated when you try to murder the range stone trying to keep worm. At least the ball speeds were 10mph compared to last year, don't look at dispersion, side spin, etc. Been hitting <500 balls in the last 3 months. And again, these are range balls made for a too short range. Real distances are longer.

So, these results are just relative to each other - compare the performance of the club/shaft.

The performance of club 3, the Apex Redline blade from 88, amazes me. Feel-wise, I mishit it a couple of times. Compared to the other clubs the 6i  has a lower loft - I should have taken the 30 degrees 5i to match the loft.

Compared to the Apex 50, the FTX feels harsh or hard when you hit the ball, more like mishitting the Apex Redline. A pitty that I consider the new FTX to be my gamers. I did test the regular graphite shafted Apex Edge from 2001 again these clubs and it did well back then. Might try it next time again.

I was about the sell the rifle flighted shafted clubs (club 2 is a lonely 6i, not a set). But hey, next round I take my would-love-to-make-em gamers, the Apex 99s with me. So far I did not dare to think I am able to hit the Apex 5 x-stiff shaft well enough.

Ahh, that was fun. Winter could be soooo boring :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

tooc    2
I got a set of 06 apex with DGS300, they are really nice to hit, I would say maybe a little easier than the 99s, but don't look as nice, little more offset there actually very similar to the apex IIs, as far as offset and flange. Shall be bored out for the the fujikura r11 graphites, if it goes wrong have a set of KSB steel shafts to put into. The ftx are only for windy days, have u ever tried the Hogan hybrids there very very good

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hollister    3

After a good nights sleep and looking-up the Rifle Flighted 6.0 shaft-flex, which equals a stiff or even stiff+, I do not really understand the correlation of shaft flex and performance of my particular sticks anymore. A too stiff shaft should let me leave ball short (or right?) when not having the appropriate swing speed. A too weak shaft should lead to ballooning balls, as I saw with my regular graphite shafts. Or lead to over-draws?

Clueless. Maybe I should go and get fit for a set...

I got a set of 06 apex with DGS300, they are really nice to hit, I would say maybe a little easier than the 99s, but don't look as nice, little more offset there actually very similar to the apex IIs, as far as offset and flange. Shall be bored out for the the fujikura r11 graphites, if it goes wrong have a set of KSB steel shafts to put into. The ftx are only for windy days, have u ever tried the Hogan hybrids there very very good

FTX for windy days? That would be a luxury problem I'd like to avoid. I go test a higher trajectory ball next time on the course. Or get the shaft measured. Or do the fall into the c

I have a 2 and 3 Hogan CFT ti hybrid with the stock stiff shaft, but I did not dare to take them to the course. Compared to my regular Taylor Made Burner 07 hybrids, they sound a little too dull for my taste, feel harsh and are way harder to hit properly. Struck well, they perform well, but sound unexpected for a hybrid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    Talamore Golf Resort
    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Mission Belt
    Snell Golf
    Frogger Golf
    PitchFix USA
  • Posts

    • Going to be around a full month now.
    • I think I get where @Groucho Valentine is coming from.  I've had rounds where ball striking sucked and I shot well because of short game.  But I've had more rounds where ball striking is good, short game sucks and I still shoot better. I don't know how this will ring, but here goes.  When you take a scratch or plus golfer and put him on a course rating course of 72 or whatever, and he shoots 1 or 2 under, he's going to have stats that look similar to that of the pros.  Why? Because he's shooting the average score of the pros, but on a significantly easier course.  Pros are making those stats on a course rating of 75 or more in tournament pressure and conditions, where the greens are usually hard and running.  I would assume that groucho plays on courses that are not set up even close, condition wise, to that of pro set ups.  To get those low scores, you are putting the ball close to the hole and making a few putts here and there.  So, yeah Groucho may have stats similar to pros, but take him to tougher courses with tougher set ups and I bet those stats won't ring true anymore.
    • ... well, it was clarity for me, anyway.  

      I've been going through a slump recently.  After finally achieving a single digit index, it's been all downhill for the last 3 weeks or so.  Off the tee, I developed a quick hook that I couldn't get rid of.  Everywhere else, I've struggled to strike the ball solidly.  

      On the 5th hole this morning, I was in the rough up the left hand side.  I had 193 yards to the hole and the ball was kind of sunken down a bit, but the back of the ball was exposed.  I took a few practice swings, and then it hit me that I needed to play this like a fairway bunker shot.  I needed to make sure the contact to the back of the ball was clean and that I accelerated through the ball.  I hit a low 4 iron that ran up into the green side trap.  Other than the fact that I pulled it a bit (the rough closed the club face just enough), I played it exactly as I'd wanted to.  

      2 holes later, I had 130 to a flag in the back corner of the green.  This specific green is hard and the ball always releases.  Again, I was in the rough... but this one was sitting cleaner.  I had that same swing thought, playing it like it was a fairway bunker shot, and I hit a great shot with a pitching wedge that landed just shy of the pin and released to about 20 feet.  

      For the rest of the round, that was my thought standing over the ball with an iron.  I've been pretty good out of fairway traps for awhile now.  I don't know why it never clicked with me before today.  I hit crisper irons today than I have for the last month.  I scored like crap (a lot of shots were going further and I was left with tough up & down chances), but... striking the ball felt good again.  

      Chances are that I'll forget this again in the near future, or some other 'masterful' swing thought will take over... but, for now... at least I feel like I'm headed in the right direction.

      CY
    • It may. I'm assuming the driver is the biggest issue right now, and not just by a little. If I have a student who is coming for > 1 lesson, I take a slightly different approach. I'll work more often with an iron swing, because many of the same issues are present across the board. But if they're just coming once? I have to show them that I can help them get better with their biggest weakness. And so sometimes that means "yeah, you probably do that with your irons, but since it's magnified even more with the driver, let's work with that." It's not always a pure "golf" decision. Sometimes it's a business decision. If you've got someone coming for eight lessons, you can work up a longer-term plan, and if the driver still isn't fixed you can address it in a later lesson, and the student is more comfortable with that too. If you have one shot, you've got one chance to leave the student feeling happy at the end of the lesson. Your priorities change a little, as does the student's - he's not looking for a long-term ten-shot improvement, he wants to save two or three shots by not hitting a huge slice 14 times a round. Depending on what you mean by "generally." The driver and iron swings can be fairly different. There's less importance on getting your weight forward when the ball is teed up, you can swing faster, many pros play a different shape with the driver than irons, etc. It's a similar but different swing… depending on how picky you want to be about calling something the same or different.
    • Why?   I'll assume you're familiar with logical fallacies and spare explaining why this isn't a legitimate argument.   I don't remember Jack complaining when he was outdriving most of his fellow competitors in the 60s and 70s.    
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Bryan Kasper
      Bryan Kasper
      (25 years old)
    2. Greg Pickett Golf
      Greg Pickett Golf
      (62 years old)
    3. hobecorning
      hobecorning
      (75 years old)
    4. Lfm
      Lfm
      (73 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon