Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6739 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I am considering purchasing 60 degree lob wedge. I have Big Bertha PW - 45, AW -50, and SW - 55. Considering going outside Callaway and looking at the CG14 from Cleveland Golf. Recommendations or suggestions?

Posted
I just picked up the Cleveland 588 RTG 60* last week and love it. I went with it mainly for price and am very happy.

In my BX56:

Driver: 200 Steel 8.5
3 Wood: 200 Steel
Irons: SS Oversized 3-PWWedges: 588rtg 60* Putter: TPi-26Ball: <-----Pro V1x----->


Posted
I am considering purchasing 60 degree lob wedge. I have Big Bertha PW - 45, AW -50, and SW - 55. Considering going outside Callaway and looking at the CG14 from Cleveland Golf. Recommendations or suggestions?

keb,

Stick with the 56, just get a more versatile one before you do add a lob wedge. Lob wedges can be notoriously difficult to hit and some of the best short games in the world such as Tom Watson and Stan Utley have been honed with simply a 56. The Big Bertha sand wedge has a very thick sole and while I bet that is a help out of bunkers, it is probably very difficult to hit high, soft shots from tight lies. I would look into a Cleveland 588 RTG, they can be had for a song and is still one of the best wedges ever made. Once you get used to hitting a smaller headed traditional sand wedge, you can decide if you are ready to add a lob wedge. You might be surprised at the number and variety of shots you can hit with a 56 when you experiment with opening and closing the face.

Posted
Gas can,

Specs (bounce and angle) for the 588 RTG don't look all that different than my Sand wedge. Is the 588 better all round wedge outside the sand because of a thinner sole? Would the 588 replace the Big Bertha S wedge or do you see that still being useful in the trap. Thanks for your thoughts.

Posted
Gas can,

keb,

Although the bounce numbers don't vary much between the two, the extremely wide sole on the Big Bertha can be a liability around the greens. The much thinner sole of the 588 will help around the greens considerably especially on tight lies. Also you'll be able to get used to hitting full shots using a club without a cavity. You will learn to adapt to the thinner sole in bunkers and heavy grass by opening the wedge up to expose more bounce, it's a very versatile bunker club. Find yourself a practice green and try your hardest to get up and down from every conceivable lie.

Note: This thread is 6739 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have an update… I don't have much of a response, because the fact that they would ADD the numbers for the lead and trail shoulder together… I mean, wow. I was giving them too much credit. Nobody would think to assume they were doing THAT. That's beyond comical. One of the biomechanists I talked to put it this way: "So if I squatted down and went from 180 to 90 deg knee angle, then I would say 180 deg range of motion because I have two knees?" I'd type more (maybe), but honestly, I'm laughing a bit too hard. 🤣 Update: Mini Manavian blocked me on Instagram, so I cannot see his post showing Bryson with about 50° of range of motion (with a driver) from P4 to P7, and 75° only if you go out to the mid-follow-through. What a terrible loss for me. 😉 
    • Thanks, interesting to read. The swing is definitely very timing dependent. I hit it consistently I guess but consistently bad.    
    • I've shot 91-74 on the same day before. Couple of years ago played a two round tournament on Bethpage Black. I shot 72 in the first round and 90 in the second. First round I played very well. Second round I played okay, but had about 5 shots that hit the lips of bunkers and bounced down into them. A couple of those wound up in footprints - I was unamused - and I failed to get them out. Anyway - lots of bunkers and my bunker play isn't great and then add a couple of footprints and me getting pretty tired and it added up to a lot.  Only you can really tell though what's causing the variance. It might be that your swing is very timing dependent and when it's timed well you play well and when it's not then it goes all over the place. In that case, some lessons and working on your swing could be the key. If it's more that you tend to feel like you hit it fairly consistently, but you have days where the shots come off and days where they don't, then that's more likely a course management issue. If that's what you need to work on, then you could read Lowest Score Wins and build a plan of attack based on that.  Rest assured though that a pretty big range from high to low is fairly common. Even PGA Tour players often have 18-20 shot spreads from best to worst rounds in a season. It's a common affliction among golfers.
    • Wordle 1,822 3/6 🟨⬜🟨⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,822 4/6 ⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ 🟨⬜🟨⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟨⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.