Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6724 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I have had mine for about 8 months now (it is 10.5 degree, reg shaft). At first i thought it was great but that was largely due to the fact I had been hitting a 3 iron of the tee for the previous 8 years due to a big big slice.

But I recently recieved a TM Burner 3 wood (15 degree, reg shaft) for Xmas and am finding I am hitting this roughly as far as the Superquad off the tee....... which as got me thinking I should trade it in for the Burner driver.

Has anyone else had distance issues with the Superquad?

Also, as a side issue, what effect would going from a 10.5 degree driver to a 9.5 degree one have on swing/distance?

Thanks in advance for any contributions,

In My Bag:

Driver SuperQuad 10.5 deg - Reg
Fairway wood Burner 15 deg - Reg
Hybrid Rescue Dual 19 deg - StiffIrons 775 CB's (3-PW) - RegWedge Vokey 56 deg - StiffPutter Anser 2Bag Extreme light Carry Ball Pro V1


Posted
the Burner was designed for distance - pure distance. have you tried the Burner driver? it's longer than the superquad, supposidly.

Could it be that its Winter and the ball doesn't run as far with the driver? I get no run out of my driver this time of year - UK would be slightly drier than Ireland but a good test would be in the summer or a dry course with run.

10.5 to 9.5 - personally I have found that the variance in shots from where I aim is less with a 10.5 driver. I would have preference to being in play than an extra 10 yards - this won't be the same for everyone but that's how i roll.

WEAPONS:
Taylormade R9 10.5 L Grafalloy Prolaunch Platinum stiff 65g
Taylormade R9 15 NU YS+6 stiff 65g
Taylormade R9 19 NU YS+6 stiff 65g
Taylormade Tour Preferred 4-PW KBS Tour X-Stiff Cleveland CG12 RTG+ DSG 51Cleveland CG12 RTG+ DSG 55Cleveland CG12 RTG+ DSG 59Yes! Tracy II putterTitleist...


Posted
the Burner was designed for distance - pure distance. have you tried the Burner driver? it's longer than the superquad, supposidly.

Yeah I suppose that makes sense. I need to go hit some drivers and see the difference but you think it is about 10 yards in difference between a 9.5 and 10.5 degree loft.

I don't get much run summer or winter, bigger carry than most of my mates I play with but hardly any run which is very fustraiting. But I think that is because of the left to right shape of my natural shot. How is winter golf over in the old country? Its sludge, swap and mud here! Well it is in Liverpool where I am from

In My Bag:

Driver SuperQuad 10.5 deg - Reg
Fairway wood Burner 15 deg - Reg
Hybrid Rescue Dual 19 deg - StiffIrons 775 CB's (3-PW) - RegWedge Vokey 56 deg - StiffPutter Anser 2Bag Extreme light Carry Ball Pro V1


Posted
UK would be slightly drier than Ireland.

lol you have no idea how wet England has been this year

In my Ping UCLAN Team Bag

Nike Sasqautch 9.5 - V2 Stiff
Cleveland HiBore 15 - V2 Stiff
Ben Hogan Apex FTX, 2 - PW - Dynamic Gold StiffNike SV Tour 52, 58 - Dynamic Golf StiffYes Golf Callie - 33 inchesBall - Srixon Z star X


Posted

well i'm just putting out my experience - i went from 8.5* driver to 10.5* - I don't get any run ever (if anything it goes backwards in the winter )

Could have something to do with the shaft - i've never been fitted before, just tried out a few models. I just tried TaylorMades driver fitting on their website - reckoned i should be hitting a 9.5* Superquad with a TP 65 Stiff shaft (lower torque than mine, promoting a lower ballflight). I choose accuracy over distance on the fitting system, the Burner would probably have come up if i wanted distance more.

If you like the burner 3 wood, you'll like the driver. Have you tried the draw bias in the SuperQ? It's probably not going as far because of the side spin you put on the ball.

Ireland is so wet - but i'm staying indoors this month! England is generally warmer but we get the same weather fronts!

WEAPONS:
Taylormade R9 10.5 L Grafalloy Prolaunch Platinum stiff 65g
Taylormade R9 15 NU YS+6 stiff 65g
Taylormade R9 19 NU YS+6 stiff 65g
Taylormade Tour Preferred 4-PW KBS Tour X-Stiff Cleveland CG12 RTG+ DSG 51Cleveland CG12 RTG+ DSG 55Cleveland CG12 RTG+ DSG 59Yes! Tracy II putterTitleist...


Posted
polred, i would suggest getting the superquad fitted for your swing,i'm assuming its off the rack.

My Blog


Posted
I have the Burner 3 wood, love it. I get about 210yrds - 215yrds with it. And I have been testing Superquad and the Burner Drivers. Both are in the low 240's for me. The superquad has a slightly deeper face, which I like, as swing arc is my biggest issue with a driver. I definitely think is a tad more forgiving with the superquad. The Burner driver does what it advertised, at least in the feel. The shaft is longer, lighter, I seem to swing faster, the face seems hotter. May be is all in the mind. But I don't think I get anymore distance than the superquad, if it is indeed longer, it is not drastic or consistent, at least with my swing. For me, is a toss up.

Posted
polred, i would suggest getting the superquad fitted for your swing,i'm assuming its off the rack.

A club pro suggested the superquad after assessing my swing on a launch monitor, but I have improved my swing since then, I have been able to cut out the large slice I used to suffer from, though not totally.

I am hitting my 3 wood between 220-235 off the tee, the superquad a tad more on an excellent strike, but its the overall feel and swing that i like from the Burner

In My Bag:

Driver SuperQuad 10.5 deg - Reg
Fairway wood Burner 15 deg - Reg
Hybrid Rescue Dual 19 deg - StiffIrons 775 CB's (3-PW) - RegWedge Vokey 56 deg - StiffPutter Anser 2Bag Extreme light Carry Ball Pro V1


Posted
Also, as a side issue, what effect would going from a 10.5 degree driver to a 9.5 degree one have on swing/distance?

I am playing the SuperQuad w/ a 9.5*, was playing an 8.5* Titleist 983K, I seem to be getting about 10-15 yards extra with the TM.

As for 9.5* vs 10.5*, initial launch angles may be higher with the 10.5, but your side spin may be slightly reduced on mishits off center. As with anything in golf, getting fitted will show you how the launch, backspin, and side spin can be affected with the different lofts.

Note: This thread is 6724 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have an update… I don't have much of a response, because the fact that they would ADD the numbers for the lead and trail shoulder together… I mean, wow. I was giving them too much credit. Nobody would think to assume they were doing THAT. That's beyond comical. One of the biomechanists I talked to put it this way: "So if I squatted down and went from 180 to 90 deg knee angle, then I would say 180 deg range of motion because I have two knees?" I'd type more (maybe), but honestly, I'm laughing a bit too hard. 🤣 Update: Mini Manavian blocked me on Instagram, so I cannot see his post showing Bryson with about 50° of range of motion (with a driver) from P4 to P7, and 75° only if you go out to the mid-follow-through. What a terrible loss for me. 😉 
    • Thanks, interesting to read. The swing is definitely very timing dependent. I hit it consistently I guess but consistently bad.    
    • I've shot 91-74 on the same day before. Couple of years ago played a two round tournament on Bethpage Black. I shot 72 in the first round and 90 in the second. First round I played very well. Second round I played okay, but had about 5 shots that hit the lips of bunkers and bounced down into them. A couple of those wound up in footprints - I was unamused - and I failed to get them out. Anyway - lots of bunkers and my bunker play isn't great and then add a couple of footprints and me getting pretty tired and it added up to a lot.  Only you can really tell though what's causing the variance. It might be that your swing is very timing dependent and when it's timed well you play well and when it's not then it goes all over the place. In that case, some lessons and working on your swing could be the key. If it's more that you tend to feel like you hit it fairly consistently, but you have days where the shots come off and days where they don't, then that's more likely a course management issue. If that's what you need to work on, then you could read Lowest Score Wins and build a plan of attack based on that.  Rest assured though that a pretty big range from high to low is fairly common. Even PGA Tour players often have 18-20 shot spreads from best to worst rounds in a season. It's a common affliction among golfers.
    • Wordle 1,822 3/6 🟨⬜🟨⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,822 4/6 ⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ 🟨⬜🟨⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟨⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.