Genericity

Try doing a club in all black (i.e. Murdered Out).... got a feeling it might look really good....

Back in the day I paint filled some iron numbers on the sole. Testors wore out fast, the auto touch up paint held on much better. This is my only experience with the two.

Testors is a soft paint and will wear off easily. I have found that the automotive touch up paint is a much better choice. It is more expensive but it is more durable. You can find it at most auto-parts stores. Around $6-7 a bottle.

Beat me to it.... what ^ he said.

I think people are just having a fun time making fun of all the marketing hype found in the golf industry. True, the vokeys are carbon steel, which is soft compared to other steels such as stainless. BUT... the wedges are cast of this material, not forged from it. Heat treatment has effects on the hardness of the metals. I would assume the "Heat Treatment" is in concerns to the cooling rate of the casts, and the difference that the rate at which a metal cools affects its hardness. That is my guess at least....

So True. How about this one, "My Carbon-Fiber Forged X-Flex Triple Low Launch putter shaft is the shiznit"

After my post I realized that it woud be an issue if the putter head was different (i.e. training device is a mallet, gamer is a blade) etc. I can see that being a issue. I want to buy this but then I don't. I like the idea mostly....

I don't know how to explain it but choking down on a putter isn't the same as having a shorter putter (at least for me). I know it sounds crazy, but to me a 35" putter that I choke down on and a 34" putter isn't the same. I have 2 identical putters; one has been cut to 34" and the other one is my backup and it is still at 35". I would have to cut down by backup before I use it... Plus if a putter is too long the butt end sometimes catches on my shirt/jacket and it screws up my stroke.

First I have no experience with this device, so I trust you and your opinion more so than my perceptions. With that said though, how can path, impact position and tempo only pertain to one putter and not the other? I mean, my path/tempo/impact position are not specific to only one putter but almost certainly are swing characteristics that would apply to all putters (allowing for small exceptions to the rule). So I guess my question is what other variables are there that make this putter ineffective as a training aid? Is it just junk or what?

Dude! Give them some time man... how long have you had them? Only a short time right? I say give them at least 5 more rounds and then make a decision.... it always takes me a few months to begin to "understand" my new irons.

I have actually heard the opposite.... that the 907D2 wasn't a highly recieved driver. I have heard the "best driver" comment made about the 909 though. I played a 10.5 905R and then went to a 9.5 907D2. I really dig the 907D2 and haven't had a reason to seriously consider buying a new driver.

I am really curious if this is worth the $75. Anyone have REAL experience with this device? On paper it looks like a great buy but if the display/device is gimmicky then it isn't.

Why don't you get a 52* High Bounce wedge and then bend it to 54*. That should give you the extra bounce you are looking for.

It depends on course condition really, but in AZ you can play most courses in normal shoes and be fine.

You mean I series PING