On a mobile and didn't feel like editing all of that quotation but I speak my gripes as a developer first, consumer second.
Also, how could anyone possibly disagree on processing power? There is absolutely no question that for the money, you get less tflops with an Apple product.
In reference to your "everyone has gotten used to it" defense of Apples navigational UI, I suppose you'd use the same argument to defend QWERTY over DVORAK?
Next, about the app store, in reference to the customers, "they're the ones paying the money".... Again obviously you've never developed an app because with Apple, the developer pays to list their app, even if it's free. So with Apple the developer pays to give his/her creation away for free while apple refuses to refund their 30% back to the developer if they decide to issue a refund to customers. That means, Apple can choose to refund customers for your app AND keep the 30% of gross sales even though that will force the developer to come out of pocket. So, yes, it doesn't surprise me that you prefer Apples "the consumer is always right and screw the developers making all this possible" ideology because in this day and age people have come to expect programmers to do their job for free. Not many of us are outspoken so it's not surprising you aren't familiar with any of this.
I mean, you do use a Huddler forum system so I see where that comes from.. -_-
Lastly, "Apple products can run an OS made years after the hardware was released." The general rule of thumb with iPhone is they can be upgraded twice. Like the iPhone 4 was limited to iOS 6 etc (I think 4 was allowed to go to 7, but it's about the same as a 2008 MacBook running Yosemite - about as fast as a Miata with a fat guy driving).
I guess you're unaware the same thing can be done on Windows/Android systems with similar performance fallbacks.
Okay I'm done pooping now, but there's plenty more flawed logic to examine in your defense the next time the Throne calls my name. :)