Jump to content
IGNORED

Tiger's best chance(s) to win a Major this year?


Clubswinger21
Note: This thread is 6236 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I think its a sign of things to come, If he keeps wiping his drives 60 yards right, the only major he'll be able to win consistantly is the British Open. The Masters used to be thought of as the only place that suits his game, well unless he gets the driver straightened out.. Tiger may not win as many green jackets as we thought. Augusta is too long for him to use a 2 iron off every tee. It'll be interesting to see his stradegy at Oakmont which is also long with US open rough, I think he might have a tough time there aswell. That said, Tiger is the best player on tour at advancing out of long rough so you never know. In my oppinion, The PGA and British Open suit his game the best this year though. He will be able to lay back with irons off the tee at both Turnberry and Carnoustie being around 7,000 yards.

The next 3 are going to be fun, and for once the Masters wont be the best Major we see this year.

: 905R 9.5*
904f 15*
Baffler DWS 20*
eye 2
spin milled 54*, Vokey 58* White Hot XG #9 Pro V1x

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I think this is going to be very intirguing - certainly for Tiger fans, of which I am one.

No doubt he will spend a lot of time sorting his driver out - as I said in one of my previous threads that's been revived, I wonder if his equipment lets him down or that he just puts a bad swing on it.

I also wonder why he oes not use 3 wood more. Hecan hit it about 270-280 IIRC which is plenty far enough seeing how good he is with it off the deck and obviously with his irons.

I answer to your question, I htink the PGA and also the Open Championship will suit him more than the US Open.
In the bag:
Driver - FT-i 9.5* Neutral Speeder 686 Stiff
Fairway Wood - X-Tour 15* Stiff
Hybrid - Nickent 3DX Ironwood 17* Aldila NV Hybrid 75S
Irons - Tour Stage Z101 Forged Irons DG S300 Shatfs (2-PW) Wedges - 52* Callaway X Tour Vintage, 58* Callaway X Tour Mack Daddy VintagePutter - Scotty...
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I often wonder why he does not go 3-wood off the tee more often also. Although Sunday he had a couple of errand 3-wood shots too.

I like Tiger to win 2 out of the next 3 majors, maybe cause he is pissed at himself for letting this one go. He know's had he played even 3 holes better he would have his 5th jacket.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
Augusta is too long for him to use a 2 iron off every tee.

Medinah wasn't too long for him to hit 3W off virtually every tee.

It'll be interesting to see his stradegy at Oakmont which is also long with US open rough, I think he might have a tough time there aswell. That said, Tiger is the best player on tour at advancing out of long rough so you never know.

I highly doubt that Tiger's plan for Oakmont is to be the best at advancing the ball out of the rough.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Medinah wasn't too long for him to hit 3W off virtually every tee.

Did i say that? anyways, Im sure it wasn't his plan to spend most of the time in the trees at augusta either. He couldnt even find a fairway with his 3 wood there. Tight fairways, Crazy bunkering, and crazy long rough = Tigers worst nightmare.. the way he's driving it. Who knows maybe the fairways will be so firm he could hit that 2 iron stinger 270 and pull out the victory, or maybe he works out his driver kinks before then. It's Tiger so obviously he's good at proving critics wrong.

: 905R 9.5*
904f 15*
Baffler DWS 20*
eye 2
spin milled 54*, Vokey 58* White Hot XG #9 Pro V1x

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Tigers best chance at a major this year is all 3 of the remaining majors. C'mon... he should be the heavy favorite in all three of them. To me that hasn't changed. Tigers driver problems at Augusta aren't new. He's always spraying it.

Driver: 09 Launcher 10.5
4 Wood: 09 Launcher Steel 17
Hybrid: Baffler DWS 20 Aldila Reg
Irons: AP1 4-GW Steel
Wedges: 588 Gunmetal 56 & 60Putter: Studio Style Newport 2Ball: NXT Tour

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Granted he sprayed the driver, but no more than usual. His problems this year were his approach shots. He is usually a killer with his irons. I can't remember a time where he was less consistent with distance control or direction. Maybe it was the wind, but when was the last time you saw him come up short or miss so badly. All that said, if he stays out of the water on the back nine and makes the putt on 16 and he is in a playoff. He was the most consistent player there. His worst round was a 74 and his best were a pair of 72's. Every time he tees up in a major, it is his best chance to win. Zach Johnson played great. It might have been the round of his life. If they went back and played the final round again, I would still put my money on Tiger.
Driver: 9.5° 905R Stiff Aldila NV 65
3 Wood: 15.° Pro Trajectory 906F4 Stiff Aldila VS Proto Blue
Hybrid: 19.0° 503 H Stiff Dynamic Gold S400
Hybrid: 21.0° Edge C.F.T. Ti Stiff Aldila NVS
Irons: 775cb 4-GW w/S300 Sand Wedge: Vokey 58° Puttter: Laguna Mid-Slant Pro PlatinumBall: ProV1Bag: Li...
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Granted he sprayed the driver, but no more than usual. His problems this year were his approach shots. He is usually a killer with his irons. I can't remember a time where he was less consistent with distance control or direction. Maybe it was the wind, but when was the last time you saw him come up short or miss so badly. All that said, if he stays out of the water on the back nine and makes the putt on 16 and he is in a playoff. He was the most consistent player there. His worst round was a 74 and his best were a pair of 72's. Every time he tees up in a major, it is his best chance to win. Zach Johnson played great. It might have been the round of his life. If they went back and played the final round again, I would still put my money on Tiger.

exactly, couldn't agree more.

Driver: 09 Launcher 10.5
4 Wood: 09 Launcher Steel 17
Hybrid: Baffler DWS 20 Aldila Reg
Irons: AP1 4-GW Steel
Wedges: 588 Gunmetal 56 & 60Putter: Studio Style Newport 2Ball: NXT Tour

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Granted he sprayed the driver, but no more than usual. His problems this year were his approach shots. He is usually a killer with his irons. I can't remember a time where he was less consistent with distance control or direction. Maybe it was the wind, but when was the last time you saw him come up short or miss so badly. All that said, if he stays out of the water on the back nine and makes the putt on 16 and he is in a playoff. He was the most consistent player there. His worst round was a 74 and his best were a pair of 72's. Every time he tees up in a major, it is his best chance to win. Zach Johnson played great. It might have been the round of his life. If they went back and played the final round again, I would still put my money on Tiger.

Exactly...I think Tiger has to be the favorite for every major for at least the next 5-7 years. Just think how many regular season non-major wins Tiger would have if he didn't play such a limited schedule. His winning percentage is awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'm new here so I don't want to be rude but a forum is a place to express one's opinion even if it differs from the majority.

Many of the Tiger comments here and other places remind me of the old SNL skit with the guys sitting around talking about "Ditka" and "Da Bears." To them Ditka could do anything.

I have complete respect for Tiger and his game. I've watched him since he was an amateur. He's grown both in physical skill and mental toughness. He's proven himself by his wins.

What bothers me is all the hype that surrounds him. I heard commentators on XM radio last week talking about giving odds and taking Tiger hands down against the entire field. Please! Some act as though the other guys play just so Tiger will have someone to beat, as if they have no hope of winning.

The hype and expectation around Tiger causes me to pull for his competitors almost every time. I always like an underdog and Zach Johnson's coolness under pressure and obvious humility in the post-round interview greatly impressed me.

Contrary to what some might suggest, Tiger is human. He is fallible. He hit his shot in the water on 15. He took his chance and lost. Sure, he might beat Zach Johson if they could replay the final round. The thing is he didn't beat him when it counted.

Again, I mean no disrespect to Tiger or anyone here. However, the hype doesn't attract me as a fan.

Now I wonder who would win if Tiger and Ditka were arm-wrestled...

________________________________
In my bag:

r7 425 Quad 9.5*
V Steel 15* r7 21* 4-PW rac lt CG11 gunmetal 52*, 56*, 60* wedges 2-Ball belly putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


In agreement to your post above, Im not a Tiger fan, im a golf fan. I pull for Tiger's opponents everytime he has the lead on Sunday. But how could you not respect what he does and has done. I made this thread to hopefully spark some discussion on oppinion's of Tiger's game in relation to the course's we will see him play in the next 3 majors.

You could say that Tiger lost the tournament on Sunday, or because of his his iron play, but ultimately having to punch out of trees, scramble for par and having longer distances into the hole contributed to alot of those approach miss cues. To say Tiger didnt have his C game is an insult to the other players and the way the course played. Why cant you say the course was tough, and he struggled?

I've never seen him win at Augusta while hitting his driver that incredibly terrible. Its no sercret that he used his 2 iron at st.Andrews in order to avoid trouble. He's been struggling with it for a couple years now and eventually its going to start costing him tournaments, like at Augusta. If he hits his driver that bad at Oakmont.. good luck.

: 905R 9.5*
904f 15*
Baffler DWS 20*
eye 2
spin milled 54*, Vokey 58* White Hot XG #9 Pro V1x

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I think its a sign of things to come, If he keeps wiping his drives 60 yards right, the only major he'll be able to win consistantly is the British Open. The Masters used to be thought of as the only place that suits his game, well unless he gets the driver straightened out.. Tiger may not win as many green jackets as we thought. Augusta is too long for him to use a 2 iron off every tee. It'll be interesting to see his stradegy at Oakmont which is also long with US open rough, I think he might have a tough time there aswell. That said, Tiger is the best player on tour at advancing out of long rough so you never know. In my oppinion, The PGA and British Open suit his game the best this year though. He will be able to lay back with irons off the tee at both Turnberry and Carnoustie being around 7,000 yards.

If you think he can win the open spraying drives 60 yrds offline at carnoustie you are totally wrong , if he does that there he will not even make the cut. have you ever played carnoustie ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Not once did i say that. I said Carnoustie plays around 7,000 yards in my 1st post. The Masters plays at 7,400 +, Oakmont at just under 7,400 yards. These course's will force him to play driver on alot of holes. Where at turnberyy (the PGA) and Carnoustie he has the option of finding more fairways by hitting his stinger 3 wood, and 2 iron (if he puts it back in his bag) which he used to win the British last year.

I havent played Carnoustie (because its on the other side of the world) but I've seen the course played through the whole Big Break series held there, I saw alot of golf being played there and you're absolutely right, if he is forced into using his driver and hits it poorly he wont have a chance.. considering carnoustie has 3 foot long fescue grass lining the fairways along with brush everywhere. Its like playing with O.B. at the edge of every fairway.

: 905R 9.5*
904f 15*
Baffler DWS 20*
eye 2
spin milled 54*, Vokey 58* White Hot XG #9 Pro V1x

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
What bothers me is all the hype that surrounds him. I heard commentators on XM radio last week talking about giving odds and taking Tiger hands down against the entire field.

Until Tiger wins 51% of the time, it's always a stupid bet. He's historically around 25%.

He hit his shot in the water on 16.

You'll want to edit that.

Again, I mean no disrespect to Tiger or anyone here. However, the hype doesn't attract me as a fan.

Hype shouldn't. 12 majors, > 25% winning percentage... that sort of stuff should.

In agreement to your post above, Im not a Tiger fan, im a golf fan. I pull for Tiger's opponents everytime he has the lead on Sunday. But how could you not respect what he does and has done. I made this thread to hopefully spark some discussion on oppinion's of Tiger's game in relation to the course's we will see him play in the next 3 majors.

I've said before and I'll say again that I like golf, but I also want to tell my grandkids some day "I watched this one guy, Tiger Woods, win 24 majors!" Telling them how you missed most of Jack Nicklaus' career but you did see one guy "almost win 16 majors" is hardly as interesting.

I root for who I like. I was rooting for Zach and Tiger on Sunday at Augusta - Zach because I think he's a good player and a good guy - and Tiger for history's sake.
To say Tiger didnt have his C game is an insult to the other players and the way the course played. Why cant you say the course was tough, and he struggled?

Struggled = C game. Not sure why you're disagreeing. Tiger had his C game. That's not disrespectful to others - they may not admit publicly, but they know with Tiger's A game four days a week they probably haven't got a shot at winning. But with his C game, or B game, they do.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Zach Johnson won the Masters by averaging 265 off the tee and never going for any par 5 in two. Regardless of how long the course Tiger could average 265 off the tee with his 3-wood and hit a long to mid iron into every par 4 at almost any of the courses listed.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 6236 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I was pondering a repeatable golf swing beings I am a beginner, and a lot of things have presented themselves in bad ways.  I am mainly speaking irons here.  The thing about golf is the ball is still, but the golfer is also standing over the ball.  Are we saying that each time I hit the ball, my spine angle, lead arm, trail arm, wrists, etc. have to be just about exact to have a repeatable golf swing?  This is already a "funky" position to be in, and a "funky" move to make.  The golf swing is more of a body swing (in my mind).  The ball is small and the sweet spot is small.  I just feel defeated in the fact that I need to bend over the ball the same way every time, same knee bend, same swing arc, and hit a small ball with a small sweet spot.  When I watch club fittings on YouTube, these guys are swinging about the same speed within 1 mph or so. Their Trackman numbers are pretty identical even in 10-20 swings.  I am just trying to make sure that this is the main summary of what needs to be done.  As a beginner, how did you all think through the process to make the swing repeatable?  Much appreciated.
    • I kind of figured that might be part of the problem. I’m still guilty of it myself at times and you’re a better ballstriker than I am. I imagine the temptation to go for the flag grows as you get more control over your wedges. Might want to think about shot selection, too. I don’t know how you typically play short game shots but I see a lot of people default to hitting high pitch shots from basically everywhere, to every hole location, without regard for how the green is contoured and how the ball might release depending on where it lands. I know my short game has been steadily improving from expanding my shot selection, overall. Though to be honest, part of that is from necessity because I was really struggling with pitch shots so I started hitting more chips from everywhere, but it taught me a lot more about how to play short game shots in general. NP man. We’re all learning and improving together. It is a really good tool.
    • 2 rounds this weekend, one at my home course and another course that I know well.   Played well for 3 of the 4 nines.    Ended up with an 80 and an 88.  Breaking it down by 9, it was 38, 42, 41, and a tough 47 where I somehow ended up with chipping/pitching shanks where I dropped at least 6 strokes on the last 6 holes.
    • Yikes, how time flies. Here we are, almost ten years later. After prioritizing family life and other things for a long time, I'm finally ready to play more golf. Grip: I came across some topics on grip and think my grip has been a bit too palmy, especially the left hand. I'm trying to get it more in the fingers and less diagonal. Setup: After a few weeks of playing, this realization came today after watching one of Erik's Covid videos. I've been standing too far from the ball, and that messes up so much. Moved closer on a short practice session and six holes today, and it felt great. It also felt familiar, so I've been there before. I went from chunking the bejesus out the wedges to much better contact. I love changes that involves no moving parts. Just a small correction on the setup and I'm hitting it better and is better suited for working on changes. I'm a few years late, but the Covid series has been very useful to get small details sorted. I've also had to revise ball position. The goal now is back of ball in the middle of the stance as the farthest back with wedges, and progressively moving forward the longer the clubs get. Haven't hit the driver yet, but inside left foot or at the toe I suppose. Full swing: It's not terrible. I noticed my hands were too low, so got that to work on. Weight forward. More of the same stuff from earlier days. Swing path is now out-in and I want the push-draw back. When I get some videos it'll be easier to tell. I've also had this idea that my tempo or flow/rhythm could improve. It's always felt rushed around the end of the backswing into the transition, where things don't line up as they should. A short pause as things settle before starting the downswing. Some lessons might be in order. Chipping and pitching: A 12-hole round this week demonstrated a severe need to practice, but also to figure out what the heck I’m trying to do. I stood over the ball with no idea of what I wanted to achieve. On a four meter chip! I was trying the locked wrists technique, which did not work at all. As usual when I need information, I look for something Erik has posted. I’ve seen the Quickie Pitching Video before, but if I got it back then, I’ve forgotten. After reviewing that topic, some other topic about chipping and most importantly, the videos on chip/pitch from his Covid series, I felt like I understood the concept. I love the idea of separating those two by what you are trying to achieve, not by distance or ball flight. With one method you use the leading edge to hit the ball first. With the other, you use the sole to slide it under the ball. I was surprised he said that he went for the pitch 90% of the time while playing. I’ve always been scared of that shot and been thinking I have to hit the ball first. Trying to slide the club under usually ended with a chunked or skulled shot. After practicing in the yard the last days I get it, and see why the pitching motion is more forgiving. It’s astounding how easy the concept and motion is. Kudos to Erik, David and anyone else involved for being an excellent students of the game and teachers. With those two videos, my short game improved leaps and bounds, without even practicing. Just getting the setup right and knowing what motions you are trying to do is a big part of improving. Soft hands and floaty swings feels so much better than a rigid “hinge and hold”, trying to fight gravity and momentum by squeezing the life out of the grip. At least how I took to understand the “hold” part. I also think the chipping motion will help in the full swing. Keeping pressure on the trigger finger to ensure the hands are leading the clubhead and not throwing it at the ball. I've also tried looking in front of the ball at times when chipping, which helps. That's something I've been doing on full swings for a long time, and can make a big difference on the ball flight. Question @iacas: You say in the videos that you want the ball somewhere near the middle of your stance, and that for pitching it's the same. On the videos you got a fairly narrow stance, where inside of the left foot is almost middle of the stance, but the ball looks more inside the left foot than middle of the stance. Is that caused by the filming angle or is the ball more towards the inside of the foot? I often hit chips and pitches from uphill and downhill lies, where a narrow stance would have me fall over. What is your thought process and setup for those shots? The lowpoint follows the upper body, around left armpit IIRC, so a ball position relative to the feet may not be in the same spot relative to the upper body with a wider stance. Practice: I've set up my nets at an indoors location where I can practice at home. I did a quick search on launch monitors (LM), but haven't decided on anything yet. We're probably buying a house in this area in the near future, so I may hold off a purchase until I see what I can get going there. At some point I'd love to get a proper setup with a LM that can be used as a simulator. Outdoors golf is not an option 4-6 months a year here, so having an indoors option would be great. That would also be a place to use the longer clubs. My nearest course is a shorter six hole course where I don't use anything longer than a 21º utility iron. To play longer 18 hole courses I have to drive 1-1.5 hours each way, which I will do now and then, but not regularly. The LM market has changed a lot since Trackman arrived, and more people are buying them for personal use, but it's still need to spend a lot of money for a decent one that can fi. track club path. The Mevo at £305 could perhaps be something to consider. Maybe they have lowered the price to get out units before a new model is launched? It is almost six years old, though perhaps modified since then. It's got limited data and obviously isn't an option as a simulator, but could provide some data when hitting into a net. I'd have to read more about it first. It has to be good enough to be useful for indoors practice. As long as I frequently hit balls on the range or course, I'll get feedback on any changes there.
    • I'm pretty good at picking targets with mid/long irons in hand, but yes lately I have been getting more aggressive than I should be, especially from 100-150. The 50-100 deficiency is mainly distance control, working on that mechanically with Evolvr, but the 100-150 is definitely a result of poor targets.  6,7,8 iron in my hand I have no problem aiming away from trouble/the flag, hitting a very committed shot to my target, but give me PW, GW, and some reason I think I need to go right at it (even though I know I shouldn't). Like here from my last round. 175 left on a short par 5 to a back right flag. Water short right and bunker long. Perfectly fine lie in sparse rough, between the jumper and downwind playing for about 10yds of help. I knew to not aim at the flag here, aimed 40 feet left of it, hit my 165 shot exactly where I was looking, easy 2 putt birdie.   But then there's this one. I had 120 left from the fairway to a semi-tucked front left flag. Not a ton of trouble around the green but the left and back rough does fall off steeper than short/right rough. For some reason I aimed right at this flag with my 120yd shot, hit it the exact proper distance but pulled it 5yds left and had a tough short sided chip. Did all I could to chip it to 8 feet and missed the putt for a bad bogey. Had I aimed directly at the middle of the green maybe 5yds right of the flag, a perfectly straight shot leaves me 20 feet tops for birdie and that same pulled shot that I hit would have left me very close to the hole.    So yeah I think the 50-100 is distance control and the 100-150 is absolutely picking better targets. I have good feels and am strong with distance control on those I just need to allow for a bigger dispersion.    This view is helpful. For the Under 25yds my proximity is almost double from the rough vs the fairway which reinforces that biggest weakness right now being inside 25yds from the rough. But then interestingly enough in the 25-50yds I'm almost equal proximity from fairway and rough, so it looks like I need to work on under 25yds from the rough and then 25-50 from the fairway. The bunker categories are only 1 attempt each so not worried about those.   Thanks as always for the insight, it's been helpful. I'm really liking ShotScope so far.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...