Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6480 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Hi,
Just a quick question, something i have been wondering. Where do shaft weight and shaft flex cross over??

I'll use the UST Proforce V2 series as an example to explain what i'm trying to ask.

Example- Would a 66g V2 in stiff (67g) flex play the same as a 76g V2 in regular flex only at a lighter weight? I know theres no set rules as to how a shaft plays when comparing different flexes and weights, just curious.
If this topic has been covered before i apologise, if it has could someone post a link for me.

Thanks heaps.

Posted
I'd like to first point out that the following information may be inaccurate, it's based mainly on my perceptions as a golf equipment consumer. Hopefully later someone with more technical information can correct any mistakes in my information.

As far as I know stiffness and weight never "cross over." Acceleration and speed in the swing causes the shaft to flex at the flex point. I suppose you can swing and accelerate a lighter shaft more easily thus making it easier to flex, but as far as I know this doesn't cross over.

In general, a smoother swing that accelerates at a steady rate can use a more flexible shaft and produce relatively consistent results. More flexible shafts are less consistent in general -- but can also produce more distance.

I guess at some level the flexibility responds to your swing whereas the weight can actually influence how you swing. If you grab a club and swing it back and forth just in your hands very quickly you can notice the flexibility, whether in a light graphite shaft or a heavier steel shaft (assuming they're the same length). The weight probably won't affect this quick movement.

I have a very fast swing with a medium tempo so I prefer stiff, heavier shafts. When I use normal flexibility shafts -- whether in a steel iron or a graphite driver -- I get inconsistency in distance and control. I prefer heavier shafts because I don't feel I need the extra speed and I feel it helps my tempo and consistency.

I apologize -- this was a hodgepodge of random intuition -- but I hope it will help you in some way.

Posted
NGCX is basically right. The weight of the head can make a difference also. Especially in Graphite, but to some degree metal shafts also. Specific areas of the shaft can be reinforced to change flex, step pattern or wall thickness, wraps, I am sure I don't know all the ways it can be done. The best example of this was when both were winning majors Nick Price used stiffer shafts than John Daly. Because his transitions were quicker and more aggressive Nick needed stiffer shafts than John who loaded the club more smoothly and gradually, but was 30 yards longer than Price.

1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow


Note: This thread is 6480 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.