Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6455 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Ok, here's the situation I'm in. Tomorrow I'm going to be ordering a new set of irons. Compared to the standard for the brand I am buying, I measure 3/4" over standard and 3 degrees upright. So here's where the issue comes in. I currently play Dynamic Gold shafts at the same length, which makes my current irons come in at about a D8 swingweight. I'm used to this and I love the solid feel. I want to stick with the ball flight, feel, and characteristics of the DG because they fit me really well. The guy who went through my fitting though suggested considering the Dynamic Gold SL so that I could keep most of the DG characteristics and keep the swingweight down a bit considering the additional length. I don't mind the high swingweight of my current irons, so I'm not sure if I should just stick with what I'm comfortable with or if I should get the DG SL instead. Does anyone know of a reason to go with the SL other than a possibly lighter swingweight, which doesn't feel like that big of an issue to me? Thanks in advance for any advice. Excited to order the new irons.

New Driver Ordered
New 3 Wood Ordered
Two New Hybrids Ordered
I-701 Irons 5-PW w/ Rifle 5.0
Callaway X-Forged Vintage Wedges 50/12, 54/14, 58/10 (C-Grind Sole) w/ Rifle 5.5Yes! Marilyn 33" Z-URS ||| SkyCaddie SG 2.5 ||| Clicgear Model 2.0


Posted
Ok, here's the situation I'm in. Tomorrow I'm going to be ordering a new set of irons. Compared to the standard for the brand I am buying, I measure 3/4" over standard and 3 degrees upright. So here's where the issue comes in. I currently play Dynamic Gold shafts at the same length, which makes my current irons come in at about a D8 swingweight. I'm used to this and I love the solid feel. I want to stick with the ball flight, feel, and characteristics of the DG because they fit me really well. The guy who went through my fitting though suggested considering the Dynamic Gold SL so that I could keep most of the DG characteristics and keep the swingweight down a bit considering the additional length. I don't mind the high swingweight of my current irons, so I'm not sure if I should just stick with what I'm comfortable with or if I should get the DG SL instead. Does anyone know of a reason to go with the SL other than a possibly lighter swingweight, which doesn't feel like that big of an issue to me? Thanks in advance for any advice. Excited to order the new irons.

According to Ralph Maltby, a lighter shaft will require a heavier head weight to get back to the original swingweight. So in your case, given that the headweights are the same weight and that you are switching to a lighter shaft, the swingweight "could" go from D0 (your current set) to C9 (your new set). 1. I think you need to ask your pro, what is the current swing weight of your set. Perhaps he knows your swingweight and believes it to be too high according to his expertise. However, swingweight to an extent is based on feel. 2. Then calculate the swingweight of your new set based on manufacturers specs (note that every increase in 1/2" is an increase in 3 swingweights). Then compare. If the swingweight is still too low, there are other means of increasing swingweight (ex. lead tape, different types of fills inside shaft/head in various points.) Correct me if I'm wrong, but a lighter shaft, given that the flex is the same would create more clubhead speed, thus more distance. This is the advantage of TT Dynamic Gold SL.
You don't know what pressure is until you've played for five dollars a hole with only two in your pocket - Lee Trevino

MP-600 @ 10.5°
Insight BUL 3-wood @ 15°
Insight BUL 5-wood @ 18° IDEA a2 4i Hybrid @ 23° MX-25 5-PW MP-R Series 52° > 50°/05° MP-R Series 54°/10° MP-R...

Note: This thread is 6455 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.