Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Self-Standing Putters. Change of Mind Forced by Who?


Note: This thread is 1120 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

A two-year delay of implementation in relation to certain uses of self-standing putters under Rule 10.2b(3) is in effect as follows:

- Until January 1, 2025, a player may use a self-standing putter by setting it down right behind or right next to the spot on which the ball came to rest to help aim or to take a stance or position their feet.

- From January 1, 2025, Rule 10.2b(3) will apply to self-standing putters and the acts described in the previous paragraph will no longer be allowed. But a player will still be allowed to use a self-standing putter that conforms to the Rules to make a stroke or take other actions allowed by the Rules. (Added December 2022)

10.2b(3) No Setting Down Object to Help with Aiming, Taking Stance or Swinging. A player must not set an object down to help with aiming or to help in taking a stance for the stroke to be made (such as a club set down on the ground to show where the player should aim or position their feet).

  • Upvote 1

  • Administrator
Posted

I'm not sure what you're asking - "change of mind forced by whom?" They want to make this a rule, but like they did with the groove rule, the anchored putting stroke rule, etc. they're phasing it out. So they're giving people two years to change it.

Some additional information:

https://assets-us-01.kc-usercontent.com/c42c7bf4-dca7-00ea-4f2e-373223f80f76/fc9320c2-b983-444d-a145-cc95731ba9b8/Additional Clarifications of the 2023 Rules of Golf - December 2022.pdf

Also:

On October 3, 2022, a communication was shared with manufacturers regarding changes to Rule 10.2b(3) of the Rules of Golf. This communication focused on how changes to Rule 10.2b(3) would apply to the use of self-standing putters.

Rule 10.2b(3) will go into effect on January 1, 2023, but, after further consideration by the USGA and The R&A, the implementation of Rule 10.2b(3) as it applies to certain uses of self-standing putters will be delayed for two years.

The delay of implementation does not change the language of Rule 10.2b(3), which will be effective on January 1, 2023.

As was previously advised in the October 3, 2022 communication, the changes to Rule 10.2b(3) apply only to the Rules of Golf, not the Equipment Rules. There is no change to the conformance status of any self-standing putters previously submitted to the USGA or The R&A for conformance evaluation

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
19 hours ago, iacas said:

I'm not sure what you're asking - "change of mind forced by whom?" They want to make this a rule, but like they did with the groove rule, the anchored putting stroke rule, etc. they're phasing it out. So they're giving people two years to change it.

Some additional information:

https://assets-us-01.kc-usercontent.com/c42c7bf4-dca7-00ea-4f2e-373223f80f76/fc9320c2-b983-444d-a145-cc95731ba9b8/Additional Clarifications of the 2023 Rules of Golf - December 2022.pdf

Also:

On October 3, 2022, a communication was shared with manufacturers regarding changes to Rule 

Rule 10.2b(3) will go into effect on January 1, 2023, but, after further consideration by the USGA and The R&A, the implementation of Rule 10.2b(3) as it applies to certain uses of self-standing putters will be delayed for two years.

 

Thanks. I hadn't seen or noticed the information in red but guess my question "Who?" suggests the manufacturers is the answer.


Note: This thread is 1120 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I think you're saying it's preposterous to think that the areas on this club are anything like what's shown here: 30mm toward the toe or heel loses only 5% distance? Highly, highly doubtful. So a guy who hits the ball there and normally hits the ball about 250… will hit it instead about 238. By missing the sweet spot by about 1.2 inches? Highly, highly doubtful. Heck, the high heel barely gets into the red, and orange is only "up to" 10%! @M2R, I've never heard of "Ask Golf Nut" but I'm dubious of his claims in the video and really, really dubious of what's on his site: "Why AskGolfNut Is the Most Trusted Data-Driven Golf Resource". Hmmmmmm.
    • Day 151 1-11 flow work today. I've been doing all pause work, so Inwanted to get some rhythm going. Recorded.
    • a) No b) This MLR says: I doubt the MLR is going to affect their weekly league games, in other words.
    • So the question was posed today by some of my friends.  Is a pitch mark the same as a divot?  I thought NO, but they argued if your ball lands in another player's divot (made by club during a swing) this was the same as a pitch mark, i.e. the ball mark made when the ball lands  
    • Original definition use to or still is how far offline you hit it. It might be better to think of it as consistency in retaining favorable launch conditions to optimize distance.   That heat map showed a gigantic 0-3% loss in ball speed. That is absurd. The true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. Good luck telling the difference if the sweet spot is under 3% in a sizable area. Especially considering variation in launch angle, spin, and outdoor weather.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.