Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6378 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Notice how the dumbass "repaired" the first mark. He knew damn good and well what he was doing and he destroyed that spot anyway. He could have repaired it correctly with a different tool and maybe showed how his was faster/easier/etc.

Posted
I've used these before...not this "exact" one, but they same type. I've got about a dozen of them from my local TPC course; they give them out to anyone who wants them. They do work fairly well...with some practice and getting used to it.

They're right about one thing...most amateurs don't know how to properly fix a ball mark. And on a lot of courses...some people don't even fix ball marks (which drives me absolutely nuts). It's nothing for me to fix 5 or 6 while waiting my turn to putt out.

WHAT'S IN MY BAG

Driver: TaylorMade RBZ 9.5 degree; 3-Wood: TaylorMade RBZ 15 degree; Hybrids: TaylorMade RBZ 19 degree; Irons: Titleist AP1; Wedges: Titleist Vokey Spin Milled 54/60; Putter: Scotty Cameron Studio Select Fastback; Ball: Callaway Hex Chrome+  Grips:  PURE Pro


Posted
They're right about one thing...most amateurs don't know how to properly fix a ball mark. And on a lot of courses...some people don't even fix ball marks (which drives me absolutely nuts). It's nothing for me to fix 5 or 6 while waiting my turn to putt out.

I'm that guy in the group that will go to as many ball marks and fix them without holding the group up. it HURTS when I see an unrepaired ball mark or one that just has the ground all TORN up.

DJ Yoshi
Official DJ: Rutgers Football
Boost Mobile Tour
In My Bag
HiBoreXL 9.5 White Board D63 Stiff Exotics CB2 5 Wood, Exotics CB3 3 Wood MP-60 5.5 Flighted Shafts 54 & Cleveland CG-10 60 Newport 2

Posted
I suspect this is another example of something that plagues golf, A USELESS INVENTION!

If traditional ones are so bad there would be signs on courses saying "Please don't use traditional pitch mark repairers" much like there are clubs that request spikes aren't worn.

From the looks of it, a dessert fork would be more than ample at doing the same job!

It reminds me of those inventions like the "Bald Eagle Golf Ball" or the "Golf Ball Balancer", as far as i am concerned these make a TINY difference, and due to clever advertising when a ball does miss the hole by 1mm, it is because of the "dimple effect" or an unbalanced golf ball.

I used a zero friction tee, didn't make any noticeable difference, and how are you supposed to tell?

In my opinion, don't waste your money on this crap, buy a traditional one for next to nothing and learn to use it properly!

Driver - 905r 9.5* with UST Proforce VT Stiff
3 Wood - SQ 3+ 13* with Grafallloy prolaunch blue Stiff
5 Wood - SQ 5* 19 with Aldila NV65 stiff
Irons - MP 67 3 + 5-PW 2deg Up + 1/2" with DG S300 shaft.
Wedges - SV 52/10 with true temper s400 BV Spin Milled 56/10 Wedge Flex BV Spin Milled 60/04...


Note: This thread is 6378 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.