Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 7436 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

So, I'm looking at some shafts for a free driver I got. The shafts I've seen are anywhere from 60-107g. Are there any benefits or is it just personal preference to get a heavier shaft? Also, when going from say a 60 to like a 107 can you feel a difference?

60g = 0.066 138 679 lb
107g = 0.235 894 621 lb

Sorry, if this is a newb question, but I just wanted to know. Thanks in advance.

Great spirits will always encounter violent opposition from mediocre minds.


  • Administrator
Posted
So, I'm looking at some shafts for a free driver I got. The shafts I've seen are anywhere from 60-107g. Are there any benefits or is it just personal preference to get a heavier shaft? Also, when going from say a 60 to like a 107 can you feel a difference?

Yes, you can feel a difference. It's 47 grams!

I will say again: "Get the lightest shaft you can control."

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Haha, sounds good. My friend who is a clubmaker can switch shafts out for me. I'm going to mess around with some. I just need to pay for the shaft and the rest is free.

Great spirits will always encounter violent opposition from mediocre minds.


Posted
Then have him build a couple irons for you with everything being the same: loft, lie, length and then use different shafts to see which feel better and work better for you :)
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Then have him build a couple irons for you with everything being the same: loft, lie, length and then use different shafts to see which feel better and work better for you :)

That sounds like a good idea. I'll give that a shot.

Great spirits will always encounter violent opposition from mediocre minds.


Posted
I like the Speeder 757 shaft in my driver cause it is light enough for added swingspeed but stable enough for accuracy. If I use anything lighter then I tend to overswing. Anything heavier then I get to tired by the end of the round. I have thought about trying the Dynamic Gold Superlite or Project X steel shafts in my driver. Will lose about 5 yards but will find more fairways, sounds like a good trade off and a whole lot cheeper to experiment with. Still use steel in my fairway woods.

Mike

Titleist 915 D-2 9,5*

Titleist 915F 15*

Titleist 915H 18*

Mizuno MP-4 3-PW

Mizuno MP 54* & 60*

Yes Pippi Putter


Posted
Agree with what Erik said. Get the lightest you can control.

If you're a "hitter" that goes at the ball pretty hard, a heavier shaft is generally better. 75-85 grams is about the top end of the best shafts these days. I think Tiger's playing an 83 gram Diamana shaft in his driver.

If you're a "swinger" that has a smoother tempo, you can generally go with even lighter shafts. I have a pretty even tempo and am grooving on the 55-gram Aldila NVS in my Fusion FT-3.

But if you have someone that's willing to install a few different shafts for you, take advantage. Shafts are the hardest thing to fit because there are so many variables. If you can try multiple options, then you're way ahead of most people!

in the bag today:
Driver: TaylorMade R9 10.5° (Fujikura Motore 65 stiff)
3-wood: Tour Edge Exotics XCG (Aldila DVS Fairway 75 stiff)
hybrid: Sonartec Md 21° (UST Proforce V2 Hybrid 85 stiff)
4-PW: Titleist 755 (Titleist TriSpec Regular)Wedges: Titleist Vokey Design 252.08 bent to 50.5° (Oil...

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Also look at more than weight. Sometimes weight can fool you. Different kick points, shaft flex, and manufacture can all have different results. If you have a local pro shop that you can demo your same driver head with different shafts is available that is the best and cheepest way to go. I am here in Michigan and we have a place thats alled Carls Golf Land. A group of my fellow golf nuts go there almost every weekend trying new combos. At no cost and they give us balls as long as we demo. I am new to this site but I have been playing since 6 years old so 30 years of teaching and coaching the game has taken me down many golf club roads. I have done much testing and have demoed many clubs. Did I mention I was left handed. Well I hope this helped a little.
Posted

Yeah, weight is not the only factor I'm looking at. I just wanted to test out what a heavier or steel shaft w/ the same characteristics (I know even though they may seem the same, they're not) would exhibit. So far I've tried true temper dynamic gold SL S300, TT tx-90 stiff and royal precision unit rifle wood 6. The rifle is really nice, but after a while (about 40 balls or so), I get a pretty good workout haha. It seems as if I'm losing some distance w/ the steel shafts, but my shots are more accurate. At least with all the balls I've hit. I'll trade distance for accuracy anyday. I think I'll be sticking with steel for a bit. Maybe when I have a little more money to play with, I can test some graphite shafts, but for the time being, I'm happy.

Great spirits will always encounter violent opposition from mediocre minds.


Posted
The only way to find out what shaft is best for you is by getting fit. You need to seek out the advise of a fitting professional. With all the technology available today, (launch monitors, impact tape, range finders) someone in your area must be using it. Basically, by seeking out the advise of these types of professionals they can look at your ball speed, launch angle, spin rate, angle of attach, path angle, and so on, to identify which head/shaft combination works best for your swing. Don't rely on what sells well, what looks good, or what your buddy uses. None of that matters. A fitter will likely first identify what length driver you need. Today so many companies are going longer and longer for more distance. Well, sure, you can hit a longer club further, look at the long drive guys using 48 inches, but how often will you be able to find the center of the face with a club that long. You begin to loose control. It's easier to control a shorter club, therefore you begin to gain consistency. (You probably never really miss with your PW, do you?) This isn't to say that your fitter will hand you a 43 inch driver, however, you'll find what length you're most accurate with. Once you've determined what length you're most able to find the sweetspot with, you can begin to accurately evaluate different shaft options. I hear many people talk about swing speed and tempo determining what shaft weight you should use. How about ball speed. If you two different clubs with different shafts, and swing them both at the same speed, wouldn't you want to begin looking at the one that produces the most ball speed. Ball speed is a sign of how well you are able to transfer energy to the ball. The more energy you transer most effectively, the more distance you'll get. Heavier won't always be better, there is a certain shaft out there that will fit you and your swing, you just need to find it. From there, you'll begin to mess around with different shafts in that weight range, with various lofts and tip stiffnesses to determine the proper swing weight based on your ball speed and launch angle until you find something that you are hitting something further and more accurately. But how about the cost involved with getting fit...? Well, drivers today are selling for up to $600+ depending upon manufacturer and shaft combo. You'd have to be pretty crazy to drop that much cash just to see if something works for you. I am also beginning to see a lot of Diamanas out there these days cause Tiger is using it. That shaft is one of the most expensive available and is really designed for a player with high ball speeds and spin rates typically seen from the impact created by tour players. Most of the weekend warriors out there using that shaft won't ever have any business using that shaft, but Tiger has it so they stick it in the bag. With all that said, say you have to pay $100 to get fit for a driver. Well, now you'll know exacly what you need (no guessing, no worries about potentially paying $400 bucks for something that won't help you - since you got fit remember) you can justify the costs associated the the process by avoiding loosing money on something you wish you never paid for. So without any further ramble, the only person who can answer your question is a club fitter. P.S. don't use a place that has you hit balls into a net with a monitor either. Unless, you plan on bringing that net out with you during you play one the course as well. Get out there on the range and work with someone who knows what your ball flight should look like.
Posted
I'll just add to the comprehensive post above, that you should factor swing weight into the equation. Do you know how much the stock shaft weighs? OEMs match head weight to shaft and grip weight to create an average swing weight that most people like, e.g., D-2. If you like the swing weight of the club as it is, try to go with a shaft weight that is close to the original.

I suspect that since this is a freebie you just want to play around and experiment on the cheap. So if you do decide to go with the steel, I'd consider going a flex down to compensate for the slower swing speed you'll generate.

Posted

the "lightest shaft you can control" is good advice. I go at it pretty hard with the woods, but I have stuck with the Harrison Pro 2.5 Tour for my fairway woods for many years, the best weight for me was 80g. However, when I tried the Harrison in my driver, I was not absolutely convinced and now use the Grafalloy Prolite 3.5 S, which is 72g, so a touch lighter. I am not sure I could tell the difference in weight, but the Harrisons did not work for me with my driver head, but do work for my Bang fairway woods.

I guess, what I am saying ( the moral of this story ) , is keep experimenting until you feel you have the right combo

Bang Driver 10.5 loft Harrison Pro 70, Bang Fairway 13 loft Harrison Pro 2.5 Tour 80
Hogan CFT ti Hybrids, Hogan Apex Edge Pro Irons, Hogan wedges
Bettinardi Putters


Note: This thread is 7436 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • The criticisms are starting already 🤣 U.S. Open pro criticizes Shinnecock green conditions: 'Bumpy' After playing his first practice round at the 2026 U.S. Open, Michael Kim offered a less-than-glowing review of Shinnecock's "bumpy" greens.   The sand, I don't care about that. If the greens didn't come back as well for latest aerification, that would be a bit of a blunder on Shinnecock I think.   
    • Well, if your frame of reference spins twice during the swing, then Bryson's ab/adduction is more like 780 degrees so there! (Yes I'm being silly, but not sure it's any sillier than what your pal Andy is doing...)
    • Update: Brandon Sorsby has decided to enter the NFL Supplemental Draft. He will not play for Texas Tech in the upcoming season.  From my perspective, I think he did the right thing. I hope he gets the correct help for his gambling addiction. I say the right thing, because I would be worried that the stress from all of this now and throughout the entire year would not be beneficial towards his mental health.  If an NFL team picks him up, then there really isn't any pressure for him to play immediately. He can work on himself and his game for the NFL.  From Texas Tech,  "Texas Tech will continue to provide the support and recovery resources Brendan requires on this journey. Furthermore, Texas Tech will not seek return of any amounts already paid to Brendan through his NIL agreements with the University," Campbell wrote. "We wish our best to Brendan, and we offer our prayers to him and his family as he chases his dreams at the next level. This has been an unbelievably painful experience for us all, but I know that his true, underlying character and lessons learned through this experience will ultimately bring him great success on the field of play and in life." Which, I also the right thing to do.   
    • So, something I noticed yesterday at the range. My eyes and visualization of what the ball needs to do is way off. I put up an alignment stick about 10 yards down range. My initial thought was, "Oh crap". Even while wearing prescription sunglasses, and I know I am hitting it towards the sun, I couldn't pick up where the ball was at all. 
    • Oh man. As you can see above, Manavian mocked me for not realizing they were getting the 130° from BOTH shoulders. Apparently, though, Manavian is also wrong, as Andy said I was lying when I cited what Manavian had written: The next thing Andy says that's both accurate and clearly stated will be the first. I replied to that post with something like: Tell Manavian who said "only counting the abduction/adduction of one shoulder rather than 2." One of the issues with “bad” information is that y’all can’t even get on the same page. You've not shown that Bryson has 130° range of motion in either shoulder separately P1 to P7. I’ve shown the numbers. You’ve name-called and just said “nuh uh” repeatedly. Did you see the AMG IG video? Of course you have. Wrapping your head around the distance the shoulder travels yet, Andy? Andy later commented to explain how he got his range of motion number (apologies to whoever @iacac and @icaca are on Instagram, who are going to be wondering just what in the hell they've gotten themselves into). Oh boy. Adding the numbers in one direction and then adding them again going back is not a "range" of motion. If I can bend my knees 140°, I don't claim to have 280° range of motion because I have two knees nor because I can also extend my knees 140° after bending them. Bryson (with a driver, again — I used his iron swing) abducts about 65° (and bends his elbow a ton) with the driver. Then he adducts 50… and then another 15°… to end up right back where he started. This is exactly the equivalent of saying that I bend my knees 140° and then straighten them, creating a range of 280°. It's so silly I don't even have much of a response. It falls down completely on its own. It doesn't need even a nudge.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.