Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6324 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I went to do my 1st club fitting in my life. It was great, I tried:
1. Taylor Made CGM Max Steel #6
2. Taylor Made CGM Max Graphite #6
3. Taylor Made Burner XD Steel #6
4. Mizuno MX-950 #6

After hitting almost 65 balls, the person told me, Taylor Made CGM Max Graphite is the best fit for me “NOW” because the ball has more speed, distance, back spin, and higher launch angel when I use it.

The person told me, nothing will go wrong if I chose one of these four iron sets, but I want the one that need a little lower handicap than I am now(38), so I can be better…

I am more confused after I did club fitting. I heard graphite is for old people, I believe I will be better, but just need more time to practice… I still have no idea which iron set I should get!!!! I need a little suggestion...

Driver: 909 D Comp (R)

Hybrid: None

Irons: Rapture V2 4-9, W, S (R)Putter: Studio Selet Newport 2Bag: TMX Stand BagShoes: :Tour 360 II

Posted
Do you by chance know all the speed, distance, back spin, and higher launch angle that you were hitting with that club? and yes you will be able to hit a graphite shaft alittle faster seeing they are alittle lighter and alittle more flex in it. The most important specs are your spins and launch angle. i believe you want your backspin for a 6 iron to be around 3500 and sidespin under 600. launch angle for a 6 iron is around 21* to 22*. and no graphite is not always for old people.

Posted
When I was a 38 handicap I could barely put the clubhead on the ball solidly half time time. I don't know how you got reliable repeatable numbers at a club fitting. Now at 20 I'm still a bit worried to go get fitted as I don't know if my swing is consistent enough from one day to the next.

SLDR 430 TP Graphite Design DI-6s
SLDR Mini Driver TP Graphite Design DI-6s
SLDR 4h Matrix Black Tie 95s
Ping G25 4-PW
Ping Gorge 50, 54, 58

Ping Anser IWI


Posted
Club fitting is a great experience. Glad you could have that..

I haven't had my first yet, but will in about a week or so!
In My Bag

Driver: Sasquatch 460 9.5°
3 Wood: Laser 3 Wood 15°
5 Wood: r7 19° (Stiff)Irons: S58 Irons 4-PW Orange DotWedge: Harmonized 60°Wedge: Z TP 54°Putter: Tiffany 34"Balls: Pro V1 Shoes: Adidas Tour 360 IIThe Meadows Golf Coursewww.themeadowsgc.comAge: 16

Posted
I thought that fitting was making the club length fit your size. Goes to show how little I really know about this game.lol

Posted
When I was a 38 handicap I could barely put the clubhead on the ball solidly half time time. I don't know how you got reliable repeatable numbers at a club fitting. Now at 20 I'm still a bit worried to go get fitted as I don't know if my swing is consistent enough from one day to the next.

Same here

Big Cart Bag:

R7 Quad 11.5*
200Steel 5wood 15*
Baffler Hybrid 18* R7 Draw Irons 3-AW Tour Action 56* / 60* Dual Force 990 Pro V1/x


Posted
the only thing that would change if you would have a better consitent swing would be the loft/lie angle... lengthening and shortening will not change as you progress with a better swing...

Posted
I am a very cynical about club fittings. They will try to sell you what they have in stock regardless whether it is right for you. Heaven forbid that they actually take measurements and explain how their fit is right for you.

I went for club fittings at multiple places back in 1987, and they were all the same. Maybe I picked the wrong places, but what a bunch of used car salesmen!

Despite my obvious need for something different (I am 6-6, with a sleeve length of 37-in), all fitters tried to push off-the-shelf and expensive sets on me. They all told me to bend at the waist and the knees, and everything is fine. They all said that longer shafts would make accuracy impossible. If that were true, then those 5-10 shrimps should play with peewee clubs. Imagine the accuracy! Jerks.

Being an engineer, I calculated the proper shaft length increase for me, and I recently bought a set of clubs with 4-in longer shafts with standard lies. What a difference! My back doesn't hurt after a bucket of balls, and I no longer hit a boatload of fat and thin shots. The bucket today was 100% solid shots, which never ever ever happened with my "fitted" clubs.

Caveat emptor!
Posted
I am a very cynical about club fittings. They will try to sell you what they have in stock regardless whether it is right for you. Heaven forbid that they actually take measurements and explain how their fit is right for you.

Wow 4" over... wow that is alot to put on a club. How high do you hit the ball... but hey whatever works works right.


Posted
Are you comparing what happened in 1987 to now? Do you realize how much has changed in golf technology since then?

Driver Ping G10 10.5*
Hybrids Ping G5 (3) 19* Bridgestone J36 (4) 22*
Irons Mizuno MP-57 5-PW
Wedges Srixon WG-504 52.08 Bridgestone WC Copper 56.13
Putter 33" Scotty Cameron Studio Select #2


Posted
Congrats on your club fitting experience, cgb max is a super forgiving and easy club to hit. I'm curious why they offered you only TM clubs during the fitting?

  Four 5 Stand Bag Blue   PRO V1X

 910 D2 9.5° - Diamana Kal'li 65g S

 RBZ Stage 2 15° - Diamana Kal'li 72g S  

 913H 21° /  910H 24° - Diamana Kal'li 82g S

 710 AP2 6-PW - Dynamic Gold S300SL

  Vokey Spin Milled 09  56° &  60° 

#1 White Hot 34" - Ionic Grip

My Swing  


Posted
I am a very cynical about club fittings. They will try to sell you what they have in stock regardless whether it is right for you. Heaven forbid that they actually take measurements and explain how their fit is right for you.

I'm willing to guess your calculation is wrong on many levels. I've got a buddy playing +1.5" and 1 degree upright at 6'5". I'm not saying that's right for everyone, but unless you have T-rex arms (37" shirts aren't) or the least athletically-postured swing ever, you've got the wrong size.

It shouldn't be too difficult to determine what's right for you in a fitting with some impact tape in terms of LLL. For what it's worth, my fitting was nothing of the sort. He started me at standard LLL and quickly shifted me away to something he could order for me. It sounds to me like you weren't fitted as much as you were demoing clubs for a salesman.

I threw my clubs into the lake so it's time to start over...

Driver: Great Big Bertha II 10°, Callaway System 60 Firm
Woods: Tour 2400 Plus 3
Hybrid: 19.0° 503 H, Adila NV 85 SIrons: X20 4-GWPutter: Studio Select Newport 2


Posted
Are you comparing what happened in 1987 to now? Do you realize how much has changed in golf technology since then?

I forgot to mention, they let me chose any iron as “Control Club,” I choose TM CGB Max… The guy made me hit 20-25 balls, the computer analyzed the data and then gave a report suggesting two graphite irons: TM CGB Max graphite & Mizuno MX-950 graphite…

I hit about 10-15 balls with each iron it suggested. The guy asked me few questions like, “Accuracy & distance, which one you preferred?”, then the computer generated the final report by comparing the results from TM CGM Max Steel, TM CGB Max graphite, & Mizuno MX-950 graphite. Computer suggested me TM CGB Max graphite. I don’t really like graphite, so I asked him to let me try TM Burner XD. After hit another 10-15 swings, computer still suggested TM CGB Max graphite is still the best choice for NOW. I don’t think I will buy graphite iron set, I think I will get TM CGB MAX Steel R. I will do another club fitting after my swing is consistent (maybe 5 years later, hahaha)
Driver: 909 D Comp (R)

Hybrid: None

Irons: Rapture V2 4-9, W, S (R)Putter: Studio Selet Newport 2Bag: TMX Stand BagShoes: :Tour 360 II

Posted
I forgot to mention, they let me chose any iron as “Control Club,” I choose TM CGB Max… The guy made me hit 20-25 balls, the computer analyzed the data and then gave a report suggesting two graphite irons: TM CGB Max graphite & Mizuno MX-950 graphite…

Wait, you're basing this solely on a computer?

Did you check your length or lie at all? Are you positive you need standard clubs? If you aren't making a majority of swings with impact tape, the other numbers really don't matter, in my opinion. You're a 36 handicap, so the question of distance vs. accuracy is moot. Focus on making good contact and the rest will come. Which irons felt better when you made center-sole, center-face contact? Those are the irons you need, not whatever the computer spits out based on a consistency-free golf swing.

I threw my clubs into the lake so it's time to start over...

Driver: Great Big Bertha II 10°, Callaway System 60 Firm
Woods: Tour 2400 Plus 3
Hybrid: 19.0° 503 H, Adila NV 85 SIrons: X20 4-GWPutter: Studio Select Newport 2


Posted
Wait, you're basing this solely on a computer?

They didn't do any length checking or impact tape thing, they "forgot" to do mine last time... I am going back this weekend...

Driver: 909 D Comp (R)

Hybrid: None

Irons: Rapture V2 4-9, W, S (R)Putter: Studio Selet Newport 2Bag: TMX Stand BagShoes: :Tour 360 II

Posted
I'm willing to guess your calculation is wrong on many levels. I've got a buddy playing +1.5" and 1 degree upright at 6'5".

I'll bet a paycheck that 1.5 inches is the longest they offer. If they offered longer extensions, then I bet his clubs would be longer (unless he has very long arms.) IMO, an upright lie adjustment is a terrible way to fit a club to someone.

Please consider this argument: 1) Assume that Golfer-X has the perfect stance and swing. 2) Golfer-X is a normal-sized person who plays standard clubs. 3) Assume that Shaq wants to swing the same way as Golfer-X, and Shaq is 20% bigger than Golfer-X in every way. If you took an 8x10 photo of Golfer-X and an 8x10 photo of Shaq, they would be identical (you would have to move back to photograph Shaq to make him fit.) 4) In order for Shaq to look like Golfer-X in the photo, Shaq's clubs would have to be 20% longer. Anything shorter would require Shaq to bend more than Golfer-X. A different lie angle changes the swing path from the "perfect" Golfer-X path to a different one. If the perfect swing requires a certain lie angle, then why force Shaq to a different angle? Another poster suggested that 1987 was a long time ago, and things have changed. Maybe that's true, but if the club fitters don't have "very long" test clubs, then they cannot really "test fit" someone very tall. Lie angle is a personal preference, not something that should be automatically increased for tall golfers. Please let me know if you have ever seen a club fitter that has such a wide range of shaft sizes to test. I've poked my head into pro shops a few times over the years, but I've never seen x-long shafts. For me, the longer shafts don't hurt my accuracy at all. The gain in accuracy from having "normal" knee bend, waist bend, lie angle, etc., outweights the loss in accuracy from longer shafts. Just my observation... if it helps a fellow tall guy, then great. Your mileage may vary
Posted
There are SOOO many factors for a great clubfitter to take into account. Too many for me to want to type. But truely, and please this is no knock at all, to a beginner with a 30s handicap, the idea is to get the club that will help eliminate the negatives more than accentuate the positives. I'm not sure you can get a lot of accurate stats at this points, so I wouldn't sweat those too much. We all start out somewhere, and you will change clubs many times as your handicap drops. What you want to do with the ball now is far different than what you will want to do with the ball as a 5 handicap.

I've never hit the CG Max but these sound like good clubs for you. And by going with a good brand name, you will hold the resale value of these clubs quite well when you change down the road.

Posted
There are SOOO many factors for a great clubfitter to take into account. Too many for me to want to type. But truely, and please this is no knock at all, to a beginner with a 30s handicap, the idea is to get the club that will help eliminate the negatives more than accentuate the positives. I'm not sure you can get a lot of accurate stats at this points, so I wouldn't sweat those too much. We all start out somewhere, and you will change clubs many times as your handicap drops. What you want to do with the ball now is far different than what you will want to do with the ball as a 5 handicap.

Very good point, thank you

Driver: 909 D Comp (R)

Hybrid: None

Irons: Rapture V2 4-9, W, S (R)Putter: Studio Selet Newport 2Bag: TMX Stand BagShoes: :Tour 360 II

Note: This thread is 6324 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 27 (7 Dec 25) - Got in a few swings with 9i and hard foam balls in backyard.  Setup weight fwd (rebuilt left foot really lets me feel the weight in a slightly painful way) - kept the backswing to around 9 o’clock focusing on contact and resulting divot pattern.  Like how the hard foam balls come off the face (almost like real balls in sound).  A good abbreviated session as I only able to hit about a dozen balls in the fading light. 
    • Day 117 12-7 A bit of chipping practice today. Full swing- hit some real balls to see where Im at. 
    • Not the part I was replying to: Handicaps did not go down much (like 0.14 on average IIRC?) when we went from 10/20*0.96 to 8/20. And a good chunk of that was from the +s.
    • I think he meant in the UK. The old system was completely different from the new one. 10/20 x 0.96 vs 8/20 would really only impact very low handicaps I think. The 0.96 serves to increase differentials for plus differentials, where 8/20 vs 10/20 works to lower differentials for all. I don't know many plus golfers who would be upset that their index got lower. A lot of really good players don't even really keep their handicaps up-to-date. They're much more interested in their WAGR rankings which get them entries to certain events.
    • Day 433 - 2025-12-07 Got some work in after Junior Elite before a night of sports (and the return of my wife!). Backswing work. Similar to what a lot of my juniors are doing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.