Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 7434 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I was wondering if anyone has any suggestions on whether or not one should upgrade their set in any particular order. For example, should you start with the irons, then move to woods or wedges, etc?

I'm asking because I'm making improvements in my game and taking golf more seriously and want to upgrade my clubs. But, Mr. Wallet doesn't like paying for new clubs all at once :)

My plan is to slowly upgrade my clubs over a year or two, but would appreciate any suggestions on where to start. I've heard that you should start with the irons and then "build-out" from there with wedges, then driver, then woods (and hybrid if used). Any thoughts on that? Where does the putter fit in?

********

Sign the slow play promise and petition


Posted
I have upgraded everything over the past few months, well almost everything. I started with adding hybrids, as my long irons were impossible to hit for me.

Then I replaced my woods which were pretty crappy.

Next I added a gap wedge to well, fill in the gap.

Then it was the driver as I wanted a high lofted one to better suit my swing speed and my lack of experience.

Finally I just got new irons. I got irons last as I really only hit my 6 - PW and I hated to spend money on a set with a 3,4, and 5 that I would probably not use.

Now I just need some new wedges. I would have done these much sooner as I use my SW around the green quite a bit, but it really isn't that bad. But now that I have a couple bucks put away for them I want two matching wedges that work well with my new irons. So I am in the process of determining what lofts to go for.

Oh, and of course I added a putter about every month, since we all know that all the 3 putting I have been doing is the result of the equipment and not the golfer :) I guess I could get a putter then the wedges...

Anywho, look at your game and ask yourself a few questions: Are there any clubs I never use, and if so are they not used because they are no good or because I struggle with them? Do I have any clubs that are sorely out of date technology wise? Am I using anything that really doesn't suit me (like blades instead of cavity backed irons or a 7.5 degree super stiff driver)? Can I get such a good deal on something that I can't pass it up?

So determine your needs and then rank them based on what will give you the greatest chance to improve your game. Maybe you can take all the aspects of the game (driving, putting, chipping, bunker play, short irons, etc.) and give yourself a value of 1 to 10. If it turns out your driving is great right now but you can't put worth a damn then the putter should of course be higher on your priority list.

Note: This thread is 7434 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • The criticisms are starting already 🤣 U.S. Open pro criticizes Shinnecock green conditions: 'Bumpy' After playing his first practice round at the 2026 U.S. Open, Michael Kim offered a less-than-glowing review of Shinnecock's "bumpy" greens.   The sand, I don't care about that. If the greens didn't come back as well for latest aerification, that would be a bit of a blunder on Shinnecock I think.   
    • Well, if your frame of reference spins twice during the swing, then Bryson's ab/adduction is more like 780 degrees so there! (Yes I'm being silly, but not sure it's any sillier than what your pal Andy is doing...)
    • Update: Brandon Sorsby has decided to enter the NFL Supplemental Draft. He will not play for Texas Tech in the upcoming season.  From my perspective, I think he did the right thing. I hope he gets the correct help for his gambling addiction. I say the right thing, because I would be worried that the stress from all of this now and throughout the entire year would not be beneficial towards his mental health.  If an NFL team picks him up, then there really isn't any pressure for him to play immediately. He can work on himself and his game for the NFL.  From Texas Tech,  "Texas Tech will continue to provide the support and recovery resources Brendan requires on this journey. Furthermore, Texas Tech will not seek return of any amounts already paid to Brendan through his NIL agreements with the University," Campbell wrote. "We wish our best to Brendan, and we offer our prayers to him and his family as he chases his dreams at the next level. This has been an unbelievably painful experience for us all, but I know that his true, underlying character and lessons learned through this experience will ultimately bring him great success on the field of play and in life." Which, I also the right thing to do.   
    • So, something I noticed yesterday at the range. My eyes and visualization of what the ball needs to do is way off. I put up an alignment stick about 10 yards down range. My initial thought was, "Oh crap". Even while wearing prescription sunglasses, and I know I am hitting it towards the sun, I couldn't pick up where the ball was at all. 
    • Oh man. As you can see above, Manavian mocked me for not realizing they were getting the 130° from BOTH shoulders. Apparently, though, Manavian is also wrong, as Andy said I was lying when I cited what Manavian had written: The next thing Andy says that's both accurate and clearly stated will be the first. I replied to that post with something like: Tell Manavian who said "only counting the abduction/adduction of one shoulder rather than 2." One of the issues with “bad” information is that y’all can’t even get on the same page. You've not shown that Bryson has 130° range of motion in either shoulder separately P1 to P7. I’ve shown the numbers. You’ve name-called and just said “nuh uh” repeatedly. Did you see the AMG IG video? Of course you have. Wrapping your head around the distance the shoulder travels yet, Andy? Andy later commented to explain how he got his range of motion number (apologies to whoever @iacac and @icaca are on Instagram, who are going to be wondering just what in the hell they've gotten themselves into). Oh boy. Adding the numbers in one direction and then adding them again going back is not a "range" of motion. If I can bend my knees 140°, I don't claim to have 280° range of motion because I have two knees nor because I can also extend my knees 140° after bending them. Bryson (with a driver, again — I used his iron swing) abducts about 65° (and bends his elbow a ton) with the driver. Then he adducts 50… and then another 15°… to end up right back where he started. This is exactly the equivalent of saying that I bend my knees 140° and then straighten them, creating a range of 280°. It's so silly I don't even have much of a response. It falls down completely on its own. It doesn't need even a nudge.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.