Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 7428 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Has anyone tried custom made clubs using frequency matched shafts. If so what were your results with them. I had some of these made up, but cannot seem to hit them consistently and went back to my old Daiwa's.

  • Administrator
Posted
Has anyone tried custom made clubs using frequency matched shafts. If so what were your results with them. I had some of these made up, but cannot seem to hit them consistently and went back to my old Daiwa's.

I haven't. Can you provide some more details? Some others may be able to help you.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I haven't. Can you provide some more details? Some others may be able to help you.

The heads are made by Infinit and shafts made by Apache. The measurement on each shaft fit a certain profile. i.e. stiff fell into 300-315cfm and the ones I received were in the range of 320-325cfm which was supposedly equal to a ladies stiff shaft. Each shaft is suppose to give you the same feel for each club with very little variance. I'm probably not explaining this too good, but am no engineer. Anyway, I do not hit them any better and some worse.


Posted
Has anyone tried custom made clubs using frequency matched shafts. If so what were your results with them. I had some of these made up, but cannot seem to hit them consistently and went back to my old Daiwa's.

I probably won't be able to help you much but some other questions might help the crowd dial in your problem... What is your swing speed with a five-iron and driver? What shaft flex is your previous set? Where are your misses going (left, right, high, low)?

Are your new irons blades or cavity backs?

Jeff

10.5° Callaway FT-iZ Tour

18°, 20°, 23° Adams Idea Pro Prototype Hybrid

4-9 Titleist 690.CB
48° Titleist Vokey Tour Nickel
54°, 58° Titleist Vokey Tour Oil Can

Scotty Cameron NP2, 33"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I probably won't be able to help you much but some other questions might help the crowd dial in your problem... What is your swing speed with a five-iron and driver? What shaft flex is your previous set? Where are your misses going (left, right, high, low)?

My swing speed with a 5 iron is about 80-85 and with a driver about 90-95 using a r=flex shaft. I generally pull the ball left with some of the irons and push right with the others. I just feel the shafts are no more different than the ones I use to hit??? Confused as usual. That's the problem with golf clubs, no two seem to be alike?? Cavity backed Infiniti irons. I believe if the person that made these for me hadn/t been transferred he could have helped me by observing which way I hit these irons and tipped them to my swing??

Golf is such a screwed up game and the people that make clubs screw me up even more. Alas, same time tomorrow?

Posted
My swing speed with a 5 iron is about 80-85 and with a driver about 90-95 using a r=flex shaft. I generally pull the ball left with some of the irons and push right with the others. I just feel the shafts are no more different than the ones I use to hit??? Confused as usual. That's the problem with golf clubs, no two seem to be alike?? Cavity backed Infiniti irons. I believe if the person that made these for me hadn/t been transferred he could have helped me by observing which way I hit these irons and tipped them to my swing??

I wonder if your shafts are too whippy. The new shafts might be softer than the first set you had. You might need a men's regular flex as opposed to the women's stiff. It could be as simple as that. You may have to disregard this shaft-fitters opinion in this regard.

I've got two fairway woods that are completely "take them out of the bag useless" because the regular-flex shafts don't match my swing. I think its important to think not only of swing speed but of tempo and release when choosing shaft flex. If you have a quick tempo but slowish swing speed, for example, the quick tempo might be over flexing the shafts even at slower swing speeds. I've recently replaced shafts in my irons and driver and they are extremely accurate compared to the regular shafts I was using before. I was all over the place with the old shafts and my game really suffered as a result. I've since gone to stiff flex and am really starting to progress because I'm not fighting whippy shafts. Anyway, consider the fact that you need stiffer shafts. You're tempo, transition, and/or swing speed may be dictating you need something different. IMHO your shafts might be way too whippy for the swing you have. Just a few thoughts and good luck! Man I'm a wind-bag. UPDATE: Spending some time hitting different shaft flexes on the course is the best way to figure this stuff out. Perhaps your local couse has some demos you could play.

Jeff

10.5° Callaway FT-iZ Tour

18°, 20°, 23° Adams Idea Pro Prototype Hybrid

4-9 Titleist 690.CB
48° Titleist Vokey Tour Nickel
54°, 58° Titleist Vokey Tour Oil Can

Scotty Cameron NP2, 33"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I wonder if your shafts are too whippy. The new shafts might be softer than the first set you had. Y might need a men's regular flex as opposed to the women's stiff. It could be as simple as that. You may have to disregard this shaft-fitters opinion in this regard.

Thanks Muskegam man, I will try a different flex// HBO


Note: This thread is 7428 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • The criticisms are starting already 🤣 U.S. Open pro criticizes Shinnecock green conditions: 'Bumpy' After playing his first practice round at the 2026 U.S. Open, Michael Kim offered a less-than-glowing review of Shinnecock's "bumpy" greens.   The sand, I don't care about that. If the greens didn't come back as well for latest aerification, that would be a bit of a blunder on Shinnecock I think.   
    • Well, if your frame of reference spins twice during the swing, then Bryson's ab/adduction is more like 780 degrees so there! (Yes I'm being silly, but not sure it's any sillier than what your pal Andy is doing...)
    • Update: Brandon Sorsby has decided to enter the NFL Supplemental Draft. He will not play for Texas Tech in the upcoming season.  From my perspective, I think he did the right thing. I hope he gets the correct help for his gambling addiction. I say the right thing, because I would be worried that the stress from all of this now and throughout the entire year would not be beneficial towards his mental health.  If an NFL team picks him up, then there really isn't any pressure for him to play immediately. He can work on himself and his game for the NFL.  From Texas Tech,  "Texas Tech will continue to provide the support and recovery resources Brendan requires on this journey. Furthermore, Texas Tech will not seek return of any amounts already paid to Brendan through his NIL agreements with the University," Campbell wrote. "We wish our best to Brendan, and we offer our prayers to him and his family as he chases his dreams at the next level. This has been an unbelievably painful experience for us all, but I know that his true, underlying character and lessons learned through this experience will ultimately bring him great success on the field of play and in life." Which, I also the right thing to do.   
    • So, something I noticed yesterday at the range. My eyes and visualization of what the ball needs to do is way off. I put up an alignment stick about 10 yards down range. My initial thought was, "Oh crap". Even while wearing prescription sunglasses, and I know I am hitting it towards the sun, I couldn't pick up where the ball was at all. 
    • Oh man. As you can see above, Manavian mocked me for not realizing they were getting the 130° from BOTH shoulders. Apparently, though, Manavian is also wrong, as Andy said I was lying when I cited what Manavian had written: The next thing Andy says that's both accurate and clearly stated will be the first. I replied to that post with something like: Tell Manavian who said "only counting the abduction/adduction of one shoulder rather than 2." One of the issues with “bad” information is that y’all can’t even get on the same page. You've not shown that Bryson has 130° range of motion in either shoulder separately P1 to P7. I’ve shown the numbers. You’ve name-called and just said “nuh uh” repeatedly. Did you see the AMG IG video? Of course you have. Wrapping your head around the distance the shoulder travels yet, Andy? Andy later commented to explain how he got his range of motion number (apologies to whoever @iacac and @icaca are on Instagram, who are going to be wondering just what in the hell they've gotten themselves into). Oh boy. Adding the numbers in one direction and then adding them again going back is not a "range" of motion. If I can bend my knees 140°, I don't claim to have 280° range of motion because I have two knees nor because I can also extend my knees 140° after bending them. Bryson (with a driver, again — I used his iron swing) abducts about 65° (and bends his elbow a ton) with the driver. Then he adducts 50… and then another 15°… to end up right back where he started. This is exactly the equivalent of saying that I bend my knees 140° and then straighten them, creating a range of 280°. It's so silly I don't even have much of a response. It falls down completely on its own. It doesn't need even a nudge.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.