Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 7401 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Ok guys alittle debate here. My co-worker and I were just talking about drivers and he said why pay 300-400 dollars on a driver when you can get a ram driver for 30 bucks. He uses a ram driver and can hit it just as far as everyone with namebrand high dollar drivers. What is ya'll take on this and explain why you think this. I'm going to go up to golf galaxy sometime this week and but this to the test.

In the Bag:

Driver: Taylormade r7 425 10.5
Woods: Taylormade Rescue Fairway #3
Irons: Taylormade Rac HT 3-PWWedges: Callaway Vintage Black 52 Top Flite 56 sandwedge Top Flite 60Putter: Taylormade Rosso Sport Marenello #2Ball: ...


Posted

Perhaps he has better than average tempo and a great swing which allows him to keep up with his partners. I don't think his playing partners are a good test by the way. He needs to see what kind of improvement he sees when he hits a stick that fits him like a glove. I think he'd be shocked how much better he'd be with a good head/shaft combination... his distance and accuracy would likely improve drastically.

What he needs to do is demo a few drivers (Titleist, TaylorMade, Ping, etc...) with lofts and shafts that fit his swing and see if he doesn't bomb it 20-30 yards further. Playing partners are a poor gauge for his potential.

Having said that, some people are happy to settle for less than their potential.

Jeff

10.5° Callaway FT-iZ Tour

18°, 20°, 23° Adams Idea Pro Prototype Hybrid

4-9 Titleist 690.CB
48° Titleist Vokey Tour Nickel
54°, 58° Titleist Vokey Tour Oil Can

Scotty Cameron NP2, 33"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
ok now this is just a debate, im all for the namebrand stuff, but what if he were to put a shaft that fits him on the ram head? what makes the namebrand and offbrand stuff so different?

In the Bag:

Driver: Taylormade r7 425 10.5
Woods: Taylormade Rescue Fairway #3
Irons: Taylormade Rac HT 3-PWWedges: Callaway Vintage Black 52 Top Flite 56 sandwedge Top Flite 60Putter: Taylormade Rosso Sport Marenello #2Ball: ...


Posted
The name brand folks have money to toss at R&D; and can put higher quality materials into their heads and shafts so that they may play better off the rack. I believe that a company like Ping, TaylorMade, Titleist, and others is going make a clubhead that is of a higher quality than a WalMart special. The technology and tolerances of a Titleist or TaylorMade is going to be way higher than a cheaper club which will translate into more forgiveness, distance, and overall playability.

I've not seen a head to head test of say a Titleist 905T 10.5° and a Ram 10.5° and therefore can't really say what the differences would be. I know that tests between club heads of the high profile companies produce quite different results so I'm sure that you'd see some significant differences between Ram and name brands. Without having first hand data I can't really say, but I do know that the principle "you get what you pay for" applies in golf as it does in most things.

You've asked a valid question and I can't really answer it with data. Your buddy would benefit from getting fitted to the right shaft regardless of the head he puts it in. He'd have to hit them head to head on a launch monitor to really know the difference.

Jeff

10.5° Callaway FT-iZ Tour

18°, 20°, 23° Adams Idea Pro Prototype Hybrid

4-9 Titleist 690.CB
48° Titleist Vokey Tour Nickel
54°, 58° Titleist Vokey Tour Oil Can

Scotty Cameron NP2, 33"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
There's no data to answer with except to repeat what Jeff said: the commonly accepted knowledge that the larger companies spend more, user better quality materials, and do things like work with shaft companies to produce a good or great shaft custom-fit for the driver head it'll go into.

A RAM driver is fine for some, especially those that don't play much or don't score very well. But as you do either (play more or score better), you'll notice the differences between the big-name brands and some of the off brands.

Some people say they never do, and are happy to pay 30% the cost. If so, more power to you. A big part of any golfer's results is the golfer itself. I'd just rather have that other small portion not be hurting my results.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
These are very good responses that I will be relaying to my co-worker. I'm like all of you and agree that bigger companies do more to improve there equipment. I use taylormade and have to say that there is a difference between using taylormade equipment and pinemeadow equipment. I have a set of pinemeadows clones and my taylormade set is so much better. My co-worker just doesn't understand why i would spend 350 dollars on a r7 425.

In the Bag:

Driver: Taylormade r7 425 10.5
Woods: Taylormade Rescue Fairway #3
Irons: Taylormade Rac HT 3-PWWedges: Callaway Vintage Black 52 Top Flite 56 sandwedge Top Flite 60Putter: Taylormade Rosso Sport Marenello #2Ball: ...


Posted
Let him use your clubs during a round and get the feel of a big name club. Most cheaper clubs only look like the more expensive ones, the main difference is inside the head. match a v8 auto with a 4cyl and who do you think will win?

R7 9.5 S Shaft
560 R7 quad R shaft
RAC LT irons
Scotty Cameron Pro Platinum


Posted
The fact of the matter here is consistency. If you put a good head/shaft combo together you will have less twisting when the clubface hits the ball. Ball flight dispersion is more extreme with a head that's not balanced right, smaller sweet spot and a whippy shaft tip. Golf is a game of misses. The less extreme the miss the lower you score.

What's in my bag
Driver: Taylor Made R7 425 9.5 degrees UST Proforce 65 shaft
3 Wood: Taylor Made V Steel 15 degrees
Taylor Made Rescue Dual 22 degrees (UST IROD shaft)
Irons: Mizuno MP-67 (bent 1 degree upright)Gap Wedge: Mizuno R Series Black Nickle 52 Sand Wedge: Mizuno R Series Black Nickle...


Note: This thread is 7401 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • The criticisms are starting already 🤣 U.S. Open pro criticizes Shinnecock green conditions: 'Bumpy' After playing his first practice round at the 2026 U.S. Open, Michael Kim offered a less-than-glowing review of Shinnecock's "bumpy" greens.   The sand, I don't care about that. If the greens didn't come back as well for latest aerification, that would be a bit of a blunder on Shinnecock I think.   
    • Well, if your frame of reference spins twice during the swing, then Bryson's ab/adduction is more like 780 degrees so there! (Yes I'm being silly, but not sure it's any sillier than what your pal Andy is doing...)
    • Update: Brandon Sorsby has decided to enter the NFL Supplemental Draft. He will not play for Texas Tech in the upcoming season.  From my perspective, I think he did the right thing. I hope he gets the correct help for his gambling addiction. I say the right thing, because I would be worried that the stress from all of this now and throughout the entire year would not be beneficial towards his mental health.  If an NFL team picks him up, then there really isn't any pressure for him to play immediately. He can work on himself and his game for the NFL.  From Texas Tech,  "Texas Tech will continue to provide the support and recovery resources Brendan requires on this journey. Furthermore, Texas Tech will not seek return of any amounts already paid to Brendan through his NIL agreements with the University," Campbell wrote. "We wish our best to Brendan, and we offer our prayers to him and his family as he chases his dreams at the next level. This has been an unbelievably painful experience for us all, but I know that his true, underlying character and lessons learned through this experience will ultimately bring him great success on the field of play and in life." Which, I also the right thing to do.   
    • So, something I noticed yesterday at the range. My eyes and visualization of what the ball needs to do is way off. I put up an alignment stick about 10 yards down range. My initial thought was, "Oh crap". Even while wearing prescription sunglasses, and I know I am hitting it towards the sun, I couldn't pick up where the ball was at all. 
    • Oh man. As you can see above, Manavian mocked me for not realizing they were getting the 130° from BOTH shoulders. Apparently, though, Manavian is also wrong, as Andy said I was lying when I cited what Manavian had written: The next thing Andy says that's both accurate and clearly stated will be the first. I replied to that post with something like: Tell Manavian who said "only counting the abduction/adduction of one shoulder rather than 2." One of the issues with “bad” information is that y’all can’t even get on the same page. You've not shown that Bryson has 130° range of motion in either shoulder separately P1 to P7. I’ve shown the numbers. You’ve name-called and just said “nuh uh” repeatedly. Did you see the AMG IG video? Of course you have. Wrapping your head around the distance the shoulder travels yet, Andy? Andy later commented to explain how he got his range of motion number (apologies to whoever @iacac and @icaca are on Instagram, who are going to be wondering just what in the hell they've gotten themselves into). Oh boy. Adding the numbers in one direction and then adding them again going back is not a "range" of motion. If I can bend my knees 140°, I don't claim to have 280° range of motion because I have two knees nor because I can also extend my knees 140° after bending them. Bryson (with a driver, again — I used his iron swing) abducts about 65° (and bends his elbow a ton) with the driver. Then he adducts 50… and then another 15°… to end up right back where he started. This is exactly the equivalent of saying that I bend my knees 140° and then straighten them, creating a range of 280°. It's so silly I don't even have much of a response. It falls down completely on its own. It doesn't need even a nudge.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.