Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6398 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Bought a demo 6 iron off of eBay to try how blades hit. Only tried it at the golf range and I've been hitting mostly draws or push shots. Also, the blades seem to go shorter than my cavity backs. Is this usually the case?

Definitely harder to hit straight with the blades. Will try it out on the course tomorrow.

*EDIT* Just realized its a S300 shaft compared to a #4 Ben Hogan shaft. Not sure how those 2 relate in stiffness.

« Keith »


Posted
I found two new, never before hit irons in the $10 bag at my local course. They were both MacGregor, one was the Pro M (blade) and the other was the Pro-C (milled cavity). I spent a little bit of time on the range comparing them to my own forged cavity backs. Later, I would somewhat regret not just buying the two, just to have.

I found that compared to my cavity backs, the ball did not jump of the face and as a result I wasn't getting as much distance. This is by no means saying that this will be true with all blades. I think that what I was experiencing was the extra built in forgiveness in the cavity backs. The main component that I was testing was softness in feel. I was satisfied with how my irons compared to the Macs so I was basically done. If I had purchased the irons I think that a good drill would have been to learn how to get the maximum distance with each swing, without swinging harder.

Driver: 4DX T 10.5 Evolver w/ Redboard
Hybrids: G5: 16*, 19*, 22*
Irons: Ping Eye 2 +no+ (5-PW)
Wedges: CG12: 52/10, 56/14, 60/10
Putter: C&L flowneckBall: Z-Star


Posted
I found two new, never before hit irons in the $10 bag at my local course. They were both MacGregor, one was the Pro M (blade) and the other was the Pro-C (milled cavity). I spent a little bit of time on the range comparing them to my own forged cavity backs. Later, I would somewhat regret not just buying the two, just to have.

What # irons are they? Might be interested in taking them off your hands.

« Keith »


Posted
Your results are the same as mine was. My S300's were a bit shorter than my DCI's but a lot more accurate. I was also having a slight push or fade when I first played with the S300's but after a few range sessions, I got used to the heavier shaft. After that, I could work the ball to my will.

- Tour Issue Taylormade R7 Superquad TP Matrix Ozik Xcon 5 X-stiff
- Nike Dymo 3 Wood UST Axivcore Stiff
- Nike Dymo 5 Wood UST Axivcore Stiff- Nike Blades 3-PW S300- Nike SV Tour 50* 54* 58* S400- Titleist Scotty Cameron Newport Beach- Nike Tour D


Posted
Your results are the same as mine was. My S300's were a bit shorter than my DCI's but a lot more accurate. I was also having a slight push or fade when I first played with the S300's but after a few range sessions, I got used to the heavier shaft. After that, I could work the ball to my will.

Just curious what's your SS for your 6-iron?

« Keith »


Posted
Some of the reasons blade irons MIGHT go shorter:

1. Weaker lofts - anywhere from 1-4*
2. Heavier shaft - this will lead to a slightly slower clubhead speed
3. Higher swing weight - this could reduce clubhead speed
4. Higher center of gravity - this equates to a lower launch angle
5. A more tentative swing - It's just easier to go hard at SGI iron

None of these factors have a huge effect on distance. Maybe a yard or two each. But when you compound each of these factors you could see a club/club and a half difference. This is just my opinion though, and somewhat of a shot in the dark. All things being equal, I don't thing blades hit shorter. But with blades vs. cavities, all things are rarely equal.

Posted
I was thinking of moving onto blades from my cavity backs but even with my cavity backs I'm around an average hitter. Don't want to sacrifice anymore distance. I guess I gotta learn to lag it better since I certainly am not efficient in my swing.

« Keith »


Posted
Bought a demo 6 iron off of eBay to try how blades hit. Only tried it at the golf range and I've been hitting mostly draws or push shots. Also, the blades seem to go shorter than my cavity backs. Is this usually the case?

MP-32's almost definately have weaker lofts than anything you are playing now. The offset (actually lack thereof) could be causing the pushes (by looking like the face is square when it is actually open) draws could be from overcompensation or a number of other issues.


Posted
I was thinking of moving onto blades from my cavity backs but even with my cavity backs I'm around an average hitter. Don't want to sacrifice anymore distance. I guess I gotta learn to lag it better since I certainly am not efficient in my swing.

Have you considered a 1/2 set of blades 7-PW? I'll admit I'm no better than an average hitter on distance. At about the 6 iron I need more game improvement to help my launch angle and use my slower clubhead speed efficiently. But from the 7 iron down I can take advantage of the scoring and accuracy advantages of a players' iron or blade. I hope that made some kind of sense.


Posted
I have two sets of 32s in my house, one with R300s and one with S300s. I think I hit the regulars a little longer (maybe 3 yards) and I'm more prone to hitting fades with the S300s. A shaft that is too stiff usually tends to go right. The main thing was the feel, the R300s feel much better for my swing speed and impact is much sweeter. If distance is a concern and you don't hit the blades straighter than the cavities, then you should probably stick with the cavities. If feel and workability are your main concerns, then just keep practicing with the 32s.

Posted
Have you considered a 1/2 set of blades 7-PW? I'll admit I'm no better than an average hitter on distance. At about the 6 iron I need more game improvement to help my launch angle and use my slower clubhead speed efficiently. But from the 7 iron down I can take advantage of the scoring and accuracy advantages of a players' iron or blade. I hope that made some kind of sense.

I can't see the distance being consistent with mixing cavity backs and blades. So I'd like to keep it all blades or cavity backs.

« Keith »


Note: This thread is 6398 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.