Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Effect of large heads on clubhead speed?


Note: This thread is 6405 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
OK, this is just something that has been rattling around in my head for a while. Has anyone done some studies on how much the air resistance of large drivers impacts clubhead speed? If you swing a stick with a balloon on the end it isn't the weight of the balloon that slows it down, it is the air resistance. It seems that there has to be a similar effect swinging a huge headed driver. It wouldn't be the volume of the head per se, it would be the cross sectional frontal area (I think).

I actually did a little experiment on this with my launchpad simulator. The virtual driving range gives you clubhead speed. I'm not saying the absolute speeds are accurate, but the trend was interesting. I found that I was able to get much higher clubhead speed with a small headed 3w than I could with my driver, and a larger 3w fell in between. The numbers were very repeatable.

400cc driver at 45": 105mph (typ), 109 (max)
190cc 3w at 43.5": 107mph (typ), 114 (max)
shallow 3w at 44.5": 109mph (typ), 117 (max)

This is is no way rigorous, just thought it was interesting. Anyone have any data?

Greg

"You can foment revolution or you can cure your slice - life is too short for both" David Owen

WITB*: 2010 winter edition

Driver: AyrtimeFW/hybrid: Distance Master Pro Steel 5w, 7w, 27* hybridIrons: Powerplay 5000 hybrids (6i-SW)Wedge: SMT Durometer 55 degPutter: Z/I Omega mallet*as soon...


Posted
While I have never tested this fact personally, there was an article on GolfDigest.com a couple months ago about this very subject and the fact that manufacturers are aware of this and are experiementing with designs that will lessen the resistence of the larger heads. I looked for the article to post the link but it's no longer there and I didn't see an archive (it was from Michael Johnson in his 'Equipment on Tour' article - I think it was in the magazine, so if you have older issues it was probably published 2-3 issues ago).

Just as a side note, do you remember an 'infomercial' driver from a few years ago with holes in the face to reduce wind resistence? I do not remember much about it as it's been several years ago, but it's interesting that even at that time (pre-460) at least one company was attempting to address issue.
Driver: SQ DYMO STR8-Fit
4 Wood: SQ DYMO
2H (17*), 4H (23*) & 5H (26*): Fli-Hi CLK
Irons (5-6): MX-900; (7-PW): MP-60
Wedges (51/6*): MP-T Chrome; (56/13): MP-R ChromePutter: White Hot XG 2-Ball CSPreferred Ball: e5+/e7+/B330-RXGPS Unit: NEOPush Cart: 2.0

Posted
I don't think air resistance is a factor in distance. It might be a factor in clubhead speed but I would bet that any loss there would be more than overcome by the trampoline effect and larger sweetspot of a large headed driver.

Posted
As the driver heads have gotten bigger, my clubhead speed has remained constant. I first had my CHS measured in 1989, and even though I've aged 20 years (I'm 62 now), my typical speed is still in the 95-100 range, with a max of about 108 when I swing out of my shoes. So no, I don't think that it has any practical effect on actually playing the game.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
This is the article of which I was referring:

http://www.golfdigest.com/golfworld/...081003johnson2

Basically it says because of aerodynamic drag, in player testing a 460cc driver compared to a 300cc driver lost 4 mph club head speed, which could equate to several yards. However, from what it says this will only make a difference in a fast swing speed. One reason this is not noticed at all is that heads, while they have become larger, have also become lighter (as the entire club has - club head, shaft, and grip) which should lead to a faster swing speed, but the drag technically does have an impact.

Of course, when it comes right down to it, this probably has very little impact on our game. It is interesting, though...
Driver: SQ DYMO STR8-Fit
4 Wood: SQ DYMO
2H (17*), 4H (23*) & 5H (26*): Fli-Hi CLK
Irons (5-6): MX-900; (7-PW): MP-60
Wedges (51/6*): MP-T Chrome; (56/13): MP-R ChromePutter: White Hot XG 2-Ball CSPreferred Ball: e5+/e7+/B330-RXGPS Unit: NEOPush Cart: 2.0

Posted
While I have never tested this fact personally, there was an article on GolfDigest.com a couple months ago about this very subject and the fact that manufacturers are aware of this and are experiementing with designs that will lessen the resistence of the larger heads. I looked for the article to post the link but it's no longer there and I didn't see an archive (it was from Michael Johnson in his 'Equipment on Tour' article - I think it was in the magazine, so if you have older issues it was probably published 2-3 issues ago).

lol, that infomercial was for the AIR HAMMER ! Yes, the same guy who makes THE Hammer... POWWWWW!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted
There will be more air friction with a larger surfaced head. This will slow the swing. A lighter shaft is intended to off set this.

Taylormade Driver HT
Taylormade 3 HT

Mcgregor 7w
Vulcan irons 5-P
Solus 53 61

Vokey 56

Scotty Caneron Flange/ Ping Cushin

Srixon ZStar

71 gold tees

bring cash


Posted
lol, that infomercial was for the

And the Air Hammer was nonconforming under USGA rules, which is why it came and went almost unnoticed.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
And the Air Hammer was nonconforming under USGA rules, which is why it came and went almost unnoticed.

i doubt if thats the reason it came and went (because it was nonconforming). i think the real reason it came and went is because it was a cheap piece of junk with a gimmick... just like The Hammer!


Posted

I am aware of a study that went in to this, when I'm in the library this afternoon I will note down the name of the journal (If I can find it) so you can look it up .

In my Ping UCLAN Team Bag

Nike Sasqautch 9.5 - V2 Stiff
Cleveland HiBore 15 - V2 Stiff
Ben Hogan Apex FTX, 2 - PW - Dynamic Gold StiffNike SV Tour 52, 58 - Dynamic Golf StiffYes Golf Callie - 33 inchesBall - Srixon Z star X


Posted
My clubhead speed with my 3 wood is just as fast as my driver. I had never thought of why, but I think it's probably for this reason.

Cleveland Hi-bore 9.5* stiff, Taylormade Burner T3 14.5* stiff, Mizuno mp 32 3-PW, Nike SV Tour Black Satin 52, 56, 60* wedges, Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 35 inches
In the market for a new driver, then my bag will be the shiz.


Note: This thread is 6405 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have been debating getting a launch monitor of some sort, if only so I can re-figure my shot zones (I haven't actually mapped them in years) and also to practice distance wedges at home.  I have to see if this works with either my current setup, or what my setup would be if I move it to the garage.  
    • Day 48, June 23.  After work today, I took 25 minutes in my practice room;  6-iron, same everything as yesterday except the time and count. 
    • Well, this is interesting.  I think we discovered a few months ago that I haven't been following professional golf in a while (my confusion about Scotty's footwork confirmed that), so at least as I aim to follow a bit more I'll get something new to learn with all of you.  My very quick read of Erik's summary makes me think this new Challenger series fits somewhere between Korn Ferry and the Championship (not Champions, but I know I'm going to make that mistake a few times if I'm not careful!).   My recollection is that there were already second-tier events among the PGA Tour;  the Bob Hope didn't have the same quality of field as the event at Riviera (whose current name I forget, although now that I say that, I realize the Palm Springs event hasn't been called the Bob Hope in a few years either).   With the absence of the FedEx (if I'm reading that correctly), does that mean no more FedEx Cup at all? Hopefully I'll have time later in 2026 to sit down and see what we're in for in 2027, where one of my goals already is to follow more professional golf.
    • The highlights as I see them: Championship and Challenger Series The creation of the PGA Tour and the PGB Tour, in the words of Joel Dahmen a few years ago. They're calling them the Championship Series (23-24 events) and the Challenger Series (20+ events). Both run February to August. They feel this will achieve three things: increasing the consistency and quality of fields across the season creating a clear system for players to earn and retain status and delivering a more structured and competitive experience for fans and partners—all in an effort to strengthen meritocracy. Championship Series Structure and Eligibility The 23-24 events includes the Players, majors, season-ending events, and the Presidents Cup and Ryder Cup. These will be 72-hole events with a 36-hole cut to the top 65 and ties and purses of $20M+. 120 players without an alternate list. 90 players (roughly) from the previous year and 20 players promoted from the Challenger Series. Full eligibility will be finalized later this year. Sites (cities) to be finalized soon, but 10 of the 15 courses have already been determined. Postseason: includes retention and relegation and concludes with match play. The Tour Championship will also be played across a rotation of prestigious courses. Challenger Series Structure and Eligibility 20+ events. Running concurrently. Will feature players fighting their way back to the Championship Series or players graduating and on the upswing from the Korn Ferry Tour. Many of these events will be current PGA Tour courses. About 7 of the Challenger Series events will be during off weeks for the Championship Series with elevated purses and visibility. Purses of at least $4M, with cuts similar to the Champ series. 144 player fields. Competitive Fields for Both Series Players will be eligible for only one series at a time: Championship Series Players are not eligible for Challenger Series events. Championship Series members will have a known schedule with all events having the same eligibility. Players and Majors will have their own eligibility criteria. Championship Series players don't have to play all events. This begs the question about, say, the Canadian Open, and other "home-town" events that players might want to play, even if they're Challenger Series events. Will releases be granted? Promotion and Relegation At least 90 players will be retained in the Championship Series, and 20 players will be promoted from the Challenger Series each year. Battlefield promotion for two-time winners from the Challenger Series. Players relegated from the Championship Series will have a "last chance" opportunity to retain status, or will go to the Challenger Series. Criteria will be finalized before the start of the 2027 season. Points System New points system (not FedExCup points). Separate points systems for the Championship and Challenger Series. Elevated points in the Challenger Series for off-weeks on the Championship Series. More details tk. Elevated International Events in the Fall The fall schedule will include a limited series of elevated international events with top players from the Championship Series, with the intent to deliver in partnership with the DP World Tour as part of the Strategic Alliance. Last Chance Series The Tour will develop a “last chance” series of 4-6 events in the fall, with a limited number of spots on the Championship Series available for top finishers. Eligibility will include players relegated from the Championship Series, Challenger Series players, and other categories to be determined. Q-School continues, as do the Korn Ferry Tour and PGA Tour Latinoamerica. Also, Brian Rolapp is the new commissioner as of January 1, 2027.
    • You can download the PDF at this link or see the first page of it above.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.