Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6079 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I still have my Bushnell 400 and love it.I will be getting an upgrade to pinseeker tech shortley.My problem with sky caddy is I all ready paid for the damn satelites 3 times R&d; the launch and the space walkes to fix them and now some one wants to charge me to rent something that I own allready?Don't make much sense to me.

In my new FT carry bag
FT-9 Tour nuetral 9.5
FT-15 degree 3 wood
Fussion Hybrids #2&4
Fussion irons with Grapholoy Pro launch Red shafts56&60 Cally X forged wedges with Red shaftsSG9 putterCally I ballBushnell Meadealist range finder


  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
Had my Bushnell since Christmas and I love it. It has definitely helped my game with yardages, and especially with allowing me to figure out how far I hit each club. I play with a guy with a Sky Caddie, and it is often 5-10 yards off what I laser, and this is usually inside 150 yards as it only gives him front back and middle. I am very happy with my choice to go with the rangefinder.

Ping G 410 10.5 ˚ Driver Ping Tour Stiff Shaft
Ping G 410 14.5˚ 3 Ping Tour Stiff Shaft
Ping G 410 19˚ Ping Tour Stiff Shaft
i 500 irons 4-UW 1/2 inch over, blue dot, NS Pro Modus 105 Stiff Shafts
Ping Stealth Wedges Wedges  54˚ 58˚

Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 34" 


Posted
Have both - skycaddy and a laser rangefinder(actually two, the Bushnell with slope and a Callaway-Nikon). In general the skycaddy much easier to use as all you have to do is look at it - also better at determining carry over hazards, distance to sand trap, etc. The disadvantage is that you habe to subscribe on an annual basis. Just saw the new Callaway GPS that has actual fly-overs from sat imaging of each hole. Smaller than the skycaddy and once you buy a course for the system you own it. Have not used it on the course.
Note: This thread is 6079 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
    • Wordle 1,630 4/6 ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ 🟨🟨⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟨🟨🟨🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Good job!  I struggled with this for some reason. Wordle 1,630 5/6 ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ 🟩⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩⬜🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟨🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,630 3/6* ⬛🟨⬛⬛⬛ ⬛⬛🟨🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.