Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 7358 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I've gotten into building my own clubs from components. My current driver sports a generic 395cc Ti head, 10.5* loft, with a Grafalloy Blue shaft. It cost a hundred bucks for the parts, and 60 percent of that was the shaft. I've hit it alongside a Taylormade R5, and one of the new Callaways (I don't recall the model), and - considering my 16 handicap - could see no benefit whatsoever to owning the so-called "pro-line" clubs.

My irons: I bought the heads for 6 bucks a piece on closeout from 'Golfworks', and chopped up my old set for the shafts. After trimming a bit off the butt end to compensate for the difference in hosel depth of the new heads, they're the best set of irons I've ever hit.

Now, freely granted, those of you who are sporting 3 or 4 handicaps are probably a little more demanding of your equipment than I am, and I have no quarrel with any of you. Play what feels right: you know your game a lot better than I do. But for middle to high handicap players such as myself, blowing 2 grand on golf sticks is pouring money down a drain. Or at least, that's the way I see it.

I play golf with high handicappers equipped with Pings, Callaways and Taylor Mades all the time, and I don't see as how they're getting any benefit whatsoever from their top-line equipment. A shank doesn't look any better coming off the hosel of a Callaway than it does from an 'Acer'.

For less than the cost of a set of pro-line clubs, you could pay for one of the better week-long golf schools. And practice is free. But you can't buy a good game.

So what do the rest of you think? I'd rather not chip in to pay the mortgage on Annika Sorenstam's summer home...

"My swing is so bad I look like a caveman killing his lunch." ~Lee Trevino

Currently playing Maltby C.E.R. 701u

Build your own...Total cost of my complete set of golf clubs: 500 bucks.Beating a guy who sports a $2000 bag of : priceless.


Posted
Personally, I see nothing wrong with component clubs for recreational players. But there's a lot to be said for getting OEM equipment at discount rates, (e.g. via eBay, or when new lines come out, the previous model usually goes for a great price). I prefer going the latter route... I picked up my Titleist 704CB's off of eBay for about $450, and got my Callaway BB 454 for under $200 when the X460 came out. A lot of golf shops have a used club department -- there are bargains to be found there, as well.

I just feel more confident with the OEMs, and have the luxury of using their customer service departments if something goes wrong.

I usually don't pay much attention to what other people play with when I go out on the course, but the last time I went, I noticed a LOT of people playing with component clubs. They seemed to be enjoying the game just as much as anyone with an OEM set.

My only recommendation is that you stick to the "quality" component club makers (Snake Eyes, Maltby, Alpha, even Pinemeadow). Stay away from the Pangs, Titleishs, King Snakes, and other "clones." Just because you can't afford the Sasquatch, doesn't mean you should go out and buy the "Yeti."

"I played like shit." -Greg Norman after the '96 Masters.


Posted
ragontana:

You make a good point. There is a much wider range of quality in the component market than there is in the "O.E.M." product lines. So the old "buyer beware" axiom is definitely in play here.

Even though I'm kind of a cheapskate, I would never play a set of "Kalloways" mainly because I'd be embarrassed to be seen with them.

I'm currently buying all my stuff from Golfworks (Maltby), and I find the quality to be quite good.

By the way, although it isn't widely known, ALL of the O.E.M. clubheads come out of the same two forges in mainland China that make most of the component equipment. The exception to that is, I believe, Ping, who still keep their own forge in the U.S.

So those of you who want to "buy American" need to stick with Karsten Solheim, which is kind of ironic if you think about it.

"My swing is so bad I look like a caveman killing his lunch." ~Lee Trevino

Currently playing Maltby C.E.R. 701u

Build your own...Total cost of my complete set of golf clubs: 500 bucks.Beating a guy who sports a $2000 bag of : priceless.


  • Moderator
Posted
I have to agree ... there are good components and bad components (usually clones). There are several manufacturers (SMT, Bang, Alpha, Maltby, Golfsmith, etc.) that put out club heads that show very well against OEM heads, plus you can mate them with the shaft of your choice. My SMT 455 has been supplanted by the Ping G5 (more forgiveness) for the moment anyway, but I wouldn't hesitate to go with components again.

In general, components are less expensive up front, but OEMs hold (some of) their value if you decide to trade in or sell them down the road.

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.
--Groucho Marx

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 7358 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • The criticisms are starting already 🤣 U.S. Open pro criticizes Shinnecock green conditions: 'Bumpy' After playing his first practice round at the 2026 U.S. Open, Michael Kim offered a less-than-glowing review of Shinnecock's "bumpy" greens.   The sand, I don't care about that. If the greens didn't come back as well for latest aerification, that would be a bit of a blunder on Shinnecock I think.   
    • Well, if your frame of reference spins twice during the swing, then Bryson's ab/adduction is more like 780 degrees so there! (Yes I'm being silly, but not sure it's any sillier than what your pal Andy is doing...)
    • Update: Brandon Sorsby has decided to enter the NFL Supplemental Draft. He will not play for Texas Tech in the upcoming season.  From my perspective, I think he did the right thing. I hope he gets the correct help for his gambling addiction. I say the right thing, because I would be worried that the stress from all of this now and throughout the entire year would not be beneficial towards his mental health.  If an NFL team picks him up, then there really isn't any pressure for him to play immediately. He can work on himself and his game for the NFL.  From Texas Tech,  "Texas Tech will continue to provide the support and recovery resources Brendan requires on this journey. Furthermore, Texas Tech will not seek return of any amounts already paid to Brendan through his NIL agreements with the University," Campbell wrote. "We wish our best to Brendan, and we offer our prayers to him and his family as he chases his dreams at the next level. This has been an unbelievably painful experience for us all, but I know that his true, underlying character and lessons learned through this experience will ultimately bring him great success on the field of play and in life." Which, I also the right thing to do.   
    • So, something I noticed yesterday at the range. My eyes and visualization of what the ball needs to do is way off. I put up an alignment stick about 10 yards down range. My initial thought was, "Oh crap". Even while wearing prescription sunglasses, and I know I am hitting it towards the sun, I couldn't pick up where the ball was at all. 
    • Oh man. As you can see above, Manavian mocked me for not realizing they were getting the 130° from BOTH shoulders. Apparently, though, Manavian is also wrong, as Andy said I was lying when I cited what Manavian had written: The next thing Andy says that's both accurate and clearly stated will be the first. I replied to that post with something like: Tell Manavian who said "only counting the abduction/adduction of one shoulder rather than 2." One of the issues with “bad” information is that y’all can’t even get on the same page. You've not shown that Bryson has 130° range of motion in either shoulder separately P1 to P7. I’ve shown the numbers. You’ve name-called and just said “nuh uh” repeatedly. Did you see the AMG IG video? Of course you have. Wrapping your head around the distance the shoulder travels yet, Andy? Andy later commented to explain how he got his range of motion number (apologies to whoever @iacac and @icaca are on Instagram, who are going to be wondering just what in the hell they've gotten themselves into). Oh boy. Adding the numbers in one direction and then adding them again going back is not a "range" of motion. If I can bend my knees 140°, I don't claim to have 280° range of motion because I have two knees nor because I can also extend my knees 140° after bending them. Bryson (with a driver, again — I used his iron swing) abducts about 65° (and bends his elbow a ton) with the driver. Then he adducts 50… and then another 15°… to end up right back where he started. This is exactly the equivalent of saying that I bend my knees 140° and then straighten them, creating a range of 280°. It's so silly I don't even have much of a response. It falls down completely on its own. It doesn't need even a nudge.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.