Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6165 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Getting fitted for a new set of Titleist AP2's and was wondering if anyone out there is swinging 6.5 stiffness Project X rifled shafts?

One rep told me I should be swinging 6.5's or 7.0's but I think that might be too drastic for me. I've been swinging 5.5 demos and although seeing decent accuracy, agree I need more stiffness because of some ballooning or some last second fades...but 6.5 may be too much. Not sure of my swing speed but I'm 6'5" 245 lbs and I can hit it. This is my last big decision with these sticks...Any suggestions? - I'm just really unsure

X86 stand bag
905T Driver
AP2 4-W
R5 3 wood
3 hybrid Vokey SM 56 #1 putter Pro V1/Pro V1x


Posted
The fitting process should sort this decision out for you. Compare the data from the 5.5, 6.0 and 6.5. We don't know enough about you or your swing to make a decision but on past experience I would have thought a 6.0 would be plenty stiff enough for you.
adams.gif Speedline fast 10 9.5˚
adams.gif Speedline fast 10 15˚
adams.gif A7 17˚
adams.gif Idea Pro 3-PW
mizuno.gif MP T-11 52˚, MP T-10 58˚  cameron.gif Red X  titleist.gif NXT

Posted
I know - the catch is that I was "fitted" at Golfsmith but a local shop near me is giving me the best price. When I was at Golfsmith I wasn't hooked up to the simulator. it was just opinion that this guy was giving me. So I don't really know... I like to demo at a real range to see the ball flight the whole way through - and they only have a standard club

X86 stand bag
905T Driver
AP2 4-W
R5 3 wood
3 hybrid Vokey SM 56 #1 putter Pro V1/Pro V1x


Posted
I like to demo at a real range to see the ball flight the whole way through

That's what you should do. I play the 6.0 Rifles in my irons. They are quite stiff. I actually lost about 1/2 a club from my old "uniflex" shafts, but gained much more control. I tried the 6.5's, they felt much stiffer than the 6.0's. The difference felt more dramatic than the difference from the 5.5-6.0 As information: My 6 iron head speed is/was 87 during the fittings, my Driver speed averaged 106. Good Luck .

Posted
Anything over 6.5 and youre probably getting into Tiger stiffness range. Unless you swing a 5 iron over 95mph i woudnt go any higher than a 6.
THE WEAPONS CACHE..

Titleist 909 D2 9.5 Degree Driver| Titleist 906f4 13.5 degree 3-Wood | Titleist 909 17 & 21 degree hybrid | Titleist AP2 irons
Titleist Vokey Wedges - 52 & 58 | Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 Putter | ProV1 Ball

Posted
Also worth considering is that your playing swing should only be approximately85% of your maximum swing. If you are swinging all out in your fitting you are doing yourself a disservice.

It would be suprising to see the need for a 6.5 or 7.0 stiffness with an 85% swing for a weekend golfer.

Regards,
-E

In my Grom bag:

Driver........... Burner 9.5* S-Flex
3-Wood......... Burner 15* S-Flex
5-Wood......... Ovation 18* S-FlexIrons............. Pro Combos 3,5-PW Rifle 6.0Wedges......... CG12 52.10, 56.14, 60.10Putter............ 33" VP1 Milled PutterBall................ e6+ or B330-SRangefinder.....


Posted
I've swung the DG's and I just like the feel of the Project X shafts better. It feels less "whipy" to me. I think the 6.0's are the way I'm going to go. Just wanted to get some reinforcement from the field. Thanks guys

X86 stand bag
905T Driver
AP2 4-W
R5 3 wood
3 hybrid Vokey SM 56 #1 putter Pro V1/Pro V1x


Posted
I've swung the DG's and I just like the feel of the Project X shafts better. It feels less "whipy" to me. I think the 6.0's are the way I'm going to go. Just wanted to get some reinforcement from the field. Thanks guys

im swinging the 6.0 with 5 iron ss of around 95


Note: This thread is 6165 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 22 - 2026-01-11 More mirror work. Back outdoors tomorrow.
    • Day 11, 1/11/26.  Today was putting, along about 6' of carpet, with coins on the ground to keep me cognizant of what I'm doing.  I think this is the at-home drill from LSW. (Ugh, missed two of the last four days -- 1/10 and 1/8)
    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.