Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6069 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I keep a handicap using a spreadsheet and these are my last 20 rounds. Is this "normal" type consistency? I feel like I have some pretty wild swings in my scores. High to low is a 23 stroke difference, and they were only 2 rounds apart! My current index is 18.1. I won't bore yall with the course ratings but average is probably a 70.5/122 or something like that.

104
93
94
102
88
94
100
92
98
104
91
91
98
106
89
83
100
97
95
91

I also chart the data and it shows a steady improvement over the last 1.5 years that I have data for, from an average score of 105 to a 93, using a linear fit. I feel like I'm getting better and I think that is good progress in 18 months. But there is so much "noise" in the data and I just am wondering if that is pretty normal for other folks around my handicap level.

And, yes, I am an engineer.

Driver: Callaway X460 Tour
3 Wood: Callaway X
Hybrid: Adams A3
Irons: X20 Tour 4-PW
Wedges: X-Forged 50, 54 & 58


Posted
I think that is pretty normal. Not that it makes you feel better. I love that you are an engineer. I am in my senior year and yes I have a spreadsheet too. My scores were all over the place. At least you have a negetive slope on you graph (meaning you are improving). My last year spread sheet ended with a positive slope. At the end of the year I start trying to hard.

To give you a comparison. My R value on my linear fit is R^2 = 0.0442. So I was all over. Just for kicks my line is y = 0.0749x + 13.952. This year I am wrote a MATLAB program to do my data analysis.

In My Bag:
Driver: 907D2 9.5*
3 Wood: 906F2 13*
5 Wood: 906F2 18*
Irons: : MP-32: 3-PWWedges: : Vokey 54.10 and 60.4Putter: Circa 62 Charcoal Mist Model #6


Posted
Looks pretty consistent with my scores actually.

I shot a 92 first round of the year. Shot a 108 a few rounds later, and a 91 today.

In the Ogio Kingpin bag:

Titleist 913 D2 9.5* w/ UST Mamiya ATTAS 3 80 w/ Harrison Shotmaker & Billy Bobs afternarket Hosel Adaptor (get this if you don't have it for your 913)
Wilson Staff Ci-11 4-GW (4I is out of the bag for a hybrid, PW and up were replaced by Edel Wedges)
TaylorMade RBZ 5 & 3 Fairway Woods

Cobra Baffler T-Rail 3 & 4 Hybrids

Edel Forged 48, 52, 56, 60, and 64* wedges (different wedges for different courses)

Seemore Si-4 Black Nickel Putter


Posted
My scoring range this year is 66 to 85 - although the 85 was before I mdde a change in my weight distribution at address that has really worked out well - last 5 have been 74, 81, 75, 66, 74.

Posted

I know I am more inconsistent than almost anyone I play with. I one had cosecutive rounds a week apart at the same course where I shot an 83 followed by a 110. My last 20 are:
104
110
86
94
94
99
83
88
95
86
98
97
122
85
86
96
93
81
87

So while you may be inconsistent, there are people more inconstant than you. I am looking forward to seeing other people response to this.

R9 with 757 Speeder
mp 57 3-pw project x 6.0 flighted
Vokey* 56* 60*
Monza Corsa Putter


Posted
your average swing band is about 2-3 rounds. You seem to shoot pretty low immediately following a bad round so you might want to analyze that. Perhaps it has something to do with your mental game. What it means exactly is anybody's guesses. You might want to revisit those rounds and try to remember what you were thinking/feeling back then and see if there's any correlation.

RZR Hawk 9.5

Diablo Tour 3W

RZR X Hybrid 21
09 X-Forged 4-P
X-Forged 52/56/60
Byron Morgan 007


Posted
your average swing band is about 2-3 rounds. You seem to shoot pretty low immediately following a bad round so you might want to analyze that. Perhaps it has something to do with your mental game. What it means exactly is anybody's guesses. You might want to revisit those rounds and try to remember what you were thinking/feeling back then and see if there's any correlation.

I noticed the same thing, I think what happens is I get mad that I played so bad and hit the range 2 or 3 times before I play again... so I guess I know how I got those good scores (practice a lot).

Driver: Callaway X460 Tour
3 Wood: Callaway X
Hybrid: Adams A3
Irons: X20 Tour 4-PW
Wedges: X-Forged 50, 54 & 58


Posted
I think that is pretty normal. Not that it makes you feel better. I love that you are an engineer. I am in my senior year and yes I have a spreadsheet too. My scores were all over the place. At least you have a negetive slope on you graph (meaning you are improving). My last year spread sheet ended with a positive slope. At the end of the year I start trying to hard.

My equation is y = -0.0192x + 861.6. Mine plots total score (not including ESC) against date. I use ESC in the handicap calculation but when I plot stuff I want to see how I actually played. We don't have an off season here so I've just been using the same sheet since the first entry, which was 8/1/2007. I've played 59 times since then; would have like to have played more but just don't have the time.

Good to hear that you wrote a Matlab script to do this - those skills will come in useful when you graduate and get a job - my first job I used it all the time doing inertial navigation stuff. If you are a Matlab guru there will always be work for you.

Driver: Callaway X460 Tour
3 Wood: Callaway X
Hybrid: Adams A3
Irons: X20 Tour 4-PW
Wedges: X-Forged 50, 54 & 58


Posted
You guys are lucky. I don't think that I have played 20 rounds total in the last 2-3 years.

To the OP, your scores look to be fine. There is some improvement there. Like others have said, everyone has the good and bad days. You just have to shake it off and do better next time. Practice the short game. You will see your scores go down quickly if you can get up-and-down more and eliminate the three putts.

I will judge my rounds much more by the quality of my best shots than the acceptability of my worse ones.


Posted
It seems like I am between 90 and 94 every time I play. Probably not accurate, but it seems that way....

Posted
That seems very typical. I know mine is the same way. I am right now a 9.3 and was an 8 two revisions ago.

My low score of my last 20 is a 78 and my high is a 92.

I am really lost right now. I think some instruction is needed.

Brian


Posted
I am glad to see that I am not the only one who feels like you do. These scores are from many different courses with slopes ranging from 120 - 135:


93*May 2009
91May 2009
42May 2009 - 9 holes
93*Apr 2009
96Apr 2009
94*Apr 2009
97Apr 2009
87*Mar 2009
102Mar 2009
91*Mar 2009
88*Mar 2009
101Mar 2009
100Mar 2009
96Feb 2009
99*Feb 2009
107Feb 2009
104Feb 2009
83*Jan 2009
91*Jan 2009
98Jan 2009
93*Dec 2008

Note: This thread is 6069 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.