Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Tougher courses, higher differentials


Note: This thread is 6048 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I've noticed a trend in my scores while tracking my stats and handicap regarding the course ratings and slopes of the different golf courses I play.

Obviously, the tougher courses with higher course ratings and slopes produce higher scores for me. However, when calculating differentials, I find they are still on average much higher than the differentials I get while playing easier courses with lower course ratings and slopes. It seems to me that the tougher courses affect my scoring ability more than their ratings suggest that they should.

Has anyone else observed this in their own scores? Is this fairly common?

I'm wondering if some of the easier courses I play may have inflated ratings somehow. The other possibilities, of course, are that those easier courses I play just happen to fit my eye and game better compared to other courses that might be of similar difficulty, or that I get psyched out at the more difficult courses and try to do too much or something along those lines
In the bag:
Driver - FT-9 10* Stock Stiff Fujikura
3Wood - X 3W Stock Stiff Callaway Graphite Shaft
Hybrids - X Hybrids 21*, 24*, 27* uniflex steel shaft
Irons - X-22 irons 6-PW uniflex steel shaftWedges - X Forged Chrome Wedges: 52*, 56*, 60*Putter - White Hot XG #9Ball - Tour ix or TP...

Posted
I think I am the opposite. I tend to struggle shooting with the easier courses I generally play because you have to shoot so low to get a decent differential. At least on tougher courses you don't have to shoot 78 to break into single digits. I think when I was shooting in the 90s i used to score about the same no matter how difficult the course was.
Bag: Flight SS
Driver: 10.5* r5 draw with Pro Launch blue 65 Stiff
Irons: CCi Forged 3i-pw
Wedges: 56* CG12 black pearl and 60* low bounce RTG 900
Putter: i-Series Anser 35"Ball: e5+Tee: Zero FrictionGlove: FootJoy WeatherSofRangefinder: MedalistShoes: Sp-6 II, Adidas 360Scores this year:92 91...

Posted
There can be a lot of different things going on here. The courses with the bigger course rating and slope maybe don't fit your eye as much as the courses with lesser rating and slope. It could be possible that when you were playing the tougher courses, you weren't playing as well as you were on the easier courses.

There's really too many factors to put into consideration when trying to answer this question. What I would focus on is are you still scoring in the same general area? If so, then good job and keep it up. Don't try to focus on little things like that. If you get really 'into' the game of golf like that, you won't be able to enjoy it. Just go out, keep score, and try to work on getting better. Don't worry about the ratings and the slopes. Have Fuuuunnnn.

~RHPM

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha Diablo 9º
2 Hybrid: Callaway Big Bertha Heavenwood
Irons: Nike Slingshot OSS 6-3 iron
          Taylormade Tour Preferred PW-7 iron
Wedges: Cleveland CG14 50º, 54º
              Taylormade RAC 58º
Putter: Ping Darby 32" shaft


 


Posted
I know for sure that my differentials are higher on tougher courses.

I have played near a scratch for almost a decade, but on higher-slope courses, I have a lot more trouble.

I imagine that comes from the fact that I'm a pretty consistent short-mid iron player and decent around the greens, but when I go wrong, it's with longer clubs.


Tough courses demand more than double as many QUALITY drives and long-iron approaches and that really impacts my score.

Stick me at 120 yards and I can hit the green from underwater. But at 200, I'm really frightened by greenside pot bunkers and tend to over-think the shot.

Driver: 905S 8* - Graffaloy Blue 65S Shaft (tipped 1" Short)
Fairway: 960F (15*, 19*)
Irons: T-Zoid Pro 4-PW w/ True Temper Steel
Wedges: MP-R Black 52*, 56*
Lob: 60* CG-10 (nice and rusty)Putter: OZ Putter (with oversized Winn Blue Grip)Ball:: One Tour


Note: This thread is 6048 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 22 - 2026-01-11 More mirror work. Back outdoors tomorrow.
    • Day 11, 1/11/26.  Today was putting, along about 6' of carpet, with coins on the ground to keep me cognizant of what I'm doing.  I think this is the at-home drill from LSW. (Ugh, missed two of the last four days -- 1/10 and 1/8)
    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.