Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5996 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Nike released info on their new line of putters today. The line is called Method. It looks like there will be 5 different models (4 blades, one mallet), and they will run $249. This is the one that Cink, Glover, Casey, and some of their other guys have played for a lot of the season. You can see them on Nike Golf's website . They look really clean compared to Nike's previous lines of putters, and they may be worth a look when they hit stores next year. I dont know that I'll bag one, because I'm really comfortable with my Anser right now, but I'll definitely be giving them a look when they come out.

Do you think these will go over a little better than their previous putters?

 
Follow me on Twitter - TST_Justin
 -  -  - 
 
This Week's Bag Drop - Miura Passing Point 9003 Forged Irons and Adams Idea Pro a12 Irons and Hybrids  - Sweet new forged cavity backs from Miura (do they make any irons that arent simply beautiful?) and irons/hybrids from Adams created with...


Posted
Doesn't look clean at all to me.

I'm saying in comparison to the IC and the OZ series, I thought they looked cleaner. The sole does look to be a little bit busy, but looking down at the putter at address, you wouldnt see that. Either way, everyone has different tastes, no big deal.

 
Follow me on Twitter - TST_Justin
 -  -  - 
 
This Week's Bag Drop - Miura Passing Point 9003 Forged Irons and Adams Idea Pro a12 Irons and Hybrids  - Sweet new forged cavity backs from Miura (do they make any irons that arent simply beautiful?) and irons/hybrids from Adams created with...


Posted
While I guess I can understand Nike wanting to put out a premium putter line, I would think that people looking to spend that much money on a putter are going to buy a Scotty.

Unless they can get TW to start gaming one.

Driver: 910D3 - Oban Kiyoshi 75 X / 909D3 - Oban Devotion 7 X
3 Wood: R9 TP - Oban Devotion 8 05
Hybrid: 909H - Project X Graphite
Irons: 4-6 AP2 - Project X 6.5 / 7-W MB - Project X 6.5
Wedges: Scratch 1018 52/56/60 KBS Tour XPutter: SC Button Back Newport 34" / SC Del Mar 34" / SC SS Newport...


Posted
I don't think TW will be shelving his custom SC anytime soon.
I am really not that much excited about Nike putters. I like their drivers and I almost bought one (SQ 5900) and the VR irons look nice, but putters? Don't know. One of my friends plays an OZ mallet, he loves it but I don't like it at all.
My achievements:
Eagles: 0
Birdies: 18
Best Round: 89

Posted
I don't think TW will be shelving his custom SC anytime soon.

I second this.

But the putter looks alright at best. The price tag is pretty hefty as well. In my opinion I think that the IC 20-10 and the Unitized blades (Leo, Retro, etc.) look "cleaner" than the Method. Just my opinion.

Posted
I second this.

I definitely agree about the Unitized line looking cleaner than the Methods, I always thought those felt very nice, looked extremely clean, and I loved the concept of the single piece construction. I never really understood why they didnt take off. I never used one in a round, but everytime I looked at one in a store, it really felt nice. I especially liked the weighting. I never really made my mind up on the IC line though...

I know the indian vs. the arrow thing comes into play here, but how much of a difference do you all think this putter really made for G-Lover, Stewart Cink, and Paul Casey? I think Cink is the one that really stands out in my mind because he went from standard to a belly putter, and then back to a regular putter (when he started using the Method prototypes).

 
Follow me on Twitter - TST_Justin
 -  -  - 
 
This Week's Bag Drop - Miura Passing Point 9003 Forged Irons and Adams Idea Pro a12 Irons and Hybrids  - Sweet new forged cavity backs from Miura (do they make any irons that arent simply beautiful?) and irons/hybrids from Adams created with...


Posted
I know the indian vs. the arrow thing comes into play here, but how much of a difference do you all think this putter

Well I'd be forced to say that the putter made a difference. Considering Nike has the stats to back it up. 66% of the majors this year have been won using the Method putter, and also a WGC event. It's just that I can guarantee that all 3 of these guys got fitted for the putter for the perfect length/loft/weight. They didn't get the putter off the rack.

I can also guess that if they found a similar-looking Scotty Cameron, Ping, etc. with the exact same length/loft/weight the difference in numbers would be around the same. It's just that if they used a Scotty, Ping, etc., they wouldn't be getting paid.

Posted
I definitely agree about the Unitized line looking cleaner than the Methods, I always thought those felt very nice, looked extremely clean, and

It's not really single-piece. They fuse the head and shaft and then put it through some sort of plating process that covers everything up.

Titleist 910D3 8.5* Aldila RIP
Titleist 910F 13.5* Diamana Kai'li
Nickent 4DX 20* and 24*
Tour Preferred 5-PW
52.08, 56.14, 60.04 Titleist Vokey

Odyssey Metal-X #9 Putter

Pro V1x


Posted
I personally like the look of Nike's new putter. I do think it is a bit overpriced though.

In my Xtreme Sport bag
'09 Burner 9.5*
F50 15* 3 Wood
Burner 18* 5 Wood
MX-19 4-GW SV Tour 54.12 & 58.08 White Hot 2-Ball SRT


Posted
It's not really single-piece.

Man, I never knew that! Thanks for the info. Not that I dont believe you, but where/how did you find that out? Also, are there any putters that are truly single piece?

I personally like the look of Nike's new putter. I do think

I agree, I kinda thought somewhere between $150-$200 might have been a little better price for it, but IF I'm spending any more than $150-$200, I know I personally would probably end up with a Scotty. With Nike trying to get a better foothold in the putter market, you'd think the pricing would have been a little more aggressive. Of course, compared to SC, it is aggressive, but still equal to other high end putters, such as Bettinardi's...

 
Follow me on Twitter - TST_Justin
 -  -  - 
 
This Week's Bag Drop - Miura Passing Point 9003 Forged Irons and Adams Idea Pro a12 Irons and Hybrids  - Sweet new forged cavity backs from Miura (do they make any irons that arent simply beautiful?) and irons/hybrids from Adams created with...


Note: This thread is 5996 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.