Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5987 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
About a month ago I bought a set of used 06 Callaway BB Irons. Today I went into Dick's Sporting Goods and had the Golf Pro flatten them. He had me hit against the Lie board for every club. For the most part he flattened the clubs by 2 degrees.

So here's my question. On the Mitchell report it showed the loft and lie prior to making any changes. For a couple of the clubs the angle was off by 1 to 2 degrees from what the Callaway site says it should be. For instance the loft on my 6 iron was 31 degrees and Callaway says the default is 29. The golf pro changed it to 28. My 8 iron should be 37 degrees and it's 35 (he didn't change that club). What I'm wonding is if this is something to be concerned about or are the numbers on Callaway's site approximations.

Thanks.

Posted
There's a tolerance limit though. So, while Callaway may say your 6 should be 29*, there's a tolerance of +/-1 or +/-2 degrees. 31* is acceptable for the 6 iron in that case. I'd recommend for everyone to get lofts checked for this reason.

In my Ogio Ozone Bag:
TM Superquad 9.5* UST Proforce 77g Stiff
15* Sonartec SS-2.5 (Pershing stiff)
19* TM Burner (stock stiff)
4-U - PING i10 White dot, +1.25 inches, ZZ65 stiff shafts55*/11* Snake Eyes Form Forged (DGS300)60*/12* Snake Eyes Form Forged (DGS300)Ping i10 1/2 MoonTitleist ProV1


Posted
well the loft on those i guess according to what you say are stronger.. because standard loft for a 5 iron is 28 and your 6 iron is 28. It isnt really anything to be concerned about, its ok to have stronger lofted clubs as long as you know that they are. but loft degree and lie angle are 2 different things.

Putter first 
:titleist: newport 2 oil can
:titleist: 58* SM4
:titleist: 54* SM4
:titleist: 50* SM4
:titleist: 4-pw AP2 project X 6.0
:ping: i20 9.5 TFC Stiff


Posted
Thanks for the responses. I hit the clubs today and man what a difference having the lie adjusted makes. As a novice, I have to say that I don't think there's a big enough emphasis made on how important this change is. I've bought several sets of irons over the years and not once did someone suggest I have the lie adjusted. It wasn't until I started doing my own research did I find the importance in it. I guess it's because for most people it's not an issue. Being on the shorter side of "average" it's more of an issue for me....

Posted
One factor contributing to non-spec measures might be the fact that they were used and abused.

If the previous owner bounced them around a lot in travel, or had a golf cart tie-down strap failure a couple of times, the clubs might have gotten bent a little. Or, maybe banged them against trees after poor shots.

For loft, main thing to check for is a smooth "yardstick" change from club to club. If your 6 iron is supposed to be 29* but it's 31*, and your 7 iron is supposed to be 33* but its 31*, you're basically carrying two 6-and-a-half irons. You need 3 to 4 degrees between iron lofts so you get 10 yards-or-so distance difference from iron to iron. (Longer shaft length going from 7- to 6-iron also increases distance).

----------------
Another secret: Each model of golf clubs, even within the same company, has its own set of specs for iron lofts. Go to Titleist online, for example, and check out 9-iron loft degrees difference between AP1 and AP2 models.
----------------

For lie, get this checked for you before you buy the clubs. Some people need irons more upright than normal, while others need irons flatter than normal. This is what's behind the Ping dot color system.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5987 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.