Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 7088 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Hopefully I'm asking this in the correct forum.

At the range today as I worked through my clubs, I noticed that while my 18 degree hybrid and my driver have a fairly penetrating ball flight that I'm happy with. However, my 3 wood has an ever-rising flight, starting out low and going up to near-driver height before it starts to descend.

If what I've read is right, this means that the club is imparting excess backspin on the ball which may be robbing me of some distance and roll. Is this correct? Is it something that I should address or leave alone? Would a different club or shaft help?

Titleist 907D1 10.5°
Titleist 906F4 15.5°
Titleist 906F4 18.5°
Wilson Staff Pi5 3-P
Titleist Vokey 56.14Cleveland CG12 60°Scotty Cameron Newport Two


  • Administrator
Posted
If what I've read is right, this means that the club is imparting excess backspin on the ball which may be robbing me of some distance and roll. Is this correct? Is it something that I should address or leave alone? Would a different club or shaft help?

Almost every club actually hits the ball to about the same height. Your pitching wedge goes about as high as your driver - it just gets there more quickly because it has a larger vertical component.

But if the ball rises unnaturally - it curves upward - that may indicate excessive backspin. That's "ballooning" and if you face a shot into the wind, it can really hurt your distance. If the ball just goes up on a fairly straight line, that is okay. I can hit my r7 TP 3W really high... but it's not a ballooning flight. A different clubhead or shaft may help, but I'd first look at your swing. Is it pretty level, or are you hitting down through the ball with the 3W? Off a tee or the ground (or does it make no difference)?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Almost every club actually hits the ball to about the same height. Your pitching wedge goes about as high as your driver - it just gets there more quickly because it has a larger vertical component.

Well, I was hitting the ball off the mat when this was happening and it was definitely an upward curve. I was sweeping the ball nicely without much, if any, contact with the mat. Contact was really solid. My swing felt about as flat as it ever has. I fight the tendency to take the club back outside, so I definitely know what a steep swing feels like.

Titleist 907D1 10.5°
Titleist 906F4 15.5°
Titleist 906F4 18.5°
Wilson Staff Pi5 3-P
Titleist Vokey 56.14Cleveland CG12 60°Scotty Cameron Newport Two


  • Administrator
Posted
Well, I was hitting the ball off the mat when this was happening and it was definitely an upward curve. I was sweeping the ball nicely without much, if any, contact with the mat. Contact was really solid. My swing felt about as flat as it ever has. I fight the tendency to take the club back outside, so I definitely know what a steep swing feels like.

Just to clarify, I meant flat through the hitting area, I didn't mean your entire swing should be flat. Through the hitting area with your longer clubs, but particularly your 3W, driver, etc., most prefer a shallow arc, not a steeply descending blow like you might have with a mid-iron.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 7088 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Day 11, 1/11/26.  Today was putting, along about 6' of carpet, with coins on the ground to keep me cognizant of what I'm doing.  I think this is the at-home drill from LSW. (Ugh, missed two of the last four days -- 1/10 and 1/8)
    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.