launch monitor exaggerates distance

[lionking]

hit two hybrids on the monitor recently - 20 deg G15 and 19 deg Adams A7. i hit about 5 shots each. distance for both was right around 235 (220 flight + 15 roll). i've never hit a similar loft hybrid (i've had a bunch) over 215 on the course.

methinks the monitor is "calibrated" for either optimal (unrealistic) conditions or just plan exaggerates so golfers buy that new club they're trying out.

anybody else think so too?

[plugged]

Actually, I find that they are accurate to within about 2-3% of my actual shot distances on the range.

[Par Fore]

Depends on the monitor.....I'm guessing they can be calibrated and programmed based on the results they want to provide

Practical knowledge:

I have hit those where my good drives fly about 260, which is right on target for no wind and flat ground.
I have hit those where my good drives were over 290, which is wishful thinking at best.


I've found the same craziness with driving ranges - all are not created equal.

[James_Black]

It depends on the monitor.
The one we have down at our range is used for lessons as well so it has to be accurate.

[sean_miller]

i've never hit a similar loft hybrid (i've had a bunch) over 215 on the course . . .

Whenever using a launch monitor, bring a couple of your own clubs for a point of reference.

[Scott_K]

Depends on monitor. Golfsmith by me has some monitor that sits in front of you and takes 2 pictures. They told me that the spin numbers, launch angles, etc. were pretty accurate and said that they've had different customers claim that the distances (carry and roll) are touch and go by about 20 yards. I am longer on the course then what I saw on the monitor.

I think the Trackman is the best out there if you have access to one. I might drive a couple of hours to get time on one.
As Sean mentioned, compare with your own gear.

Anyone know how these monitors account for different balls used ? Different compressions, etc. ?