Jump to content
IGNORED

Wedges: 4º difference in bounce noticeable?


Note: This thread is 6473 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Hey all,
doing some research on wedges, particularly the titleist spin milled in a 60º. they're only available in 4º and 8º bounce, I was wondering how big of a difference is there between the two?

I just picked up a 60º_8º, but after reading a few posts I'm starting to second guess that decision and am thinking about the 4º instead...I'll be using it mostly on 80 yrds and in, on fairways, and the occasional rough..sand play isn't a concern for me right now.

but is it all in my head, or is there a noticeable difference?

thanks
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Hey all,

just in case you didnt know, higher bounce will prevent the club from digging too much into the ground/sand. i personally use a 14bounce 56* SW and i tried to use both a 12 and 10 bounce and i caught a lot of shots really heavy. 4 bounce was a big difference for me

905R 9.5* Fujikura Speeder
200 steel 3 wood
200 steel 5 wood
690.CB 3-PW
56* 14 Pro Platinum Newport 2 Pro V1 B330-S

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have found that in the summer we had in England (remember the course at Hoylake) i needed a very low bounce on all of my wedges. I went for a 4' bounce on my spin milled wedge and found it perfect for nipping the ball off the fairway. Now, the weather has returned to normal English weather and has rained all month nearly and as a result, i find my self catching a lot of my chip shots heavy because the club digs right in.

If you have firm fairways go for a lower bounce but if they get a bit wet, you will need a higher bounce. This is what I have found but this may just be me. Hope it helps!!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
I just picked up a 60º_8º, but after reading a few posts I'm starting to second guess that decision and am thinking about the 4º instead...I'll be using it mostly on 80 yrds and in, on fairways, and the occasional rough..sand play isn't a concern for me right now.

The main reason I stopped using my 60 degree RAC Y-Cutter wedge was because it had six degrees of bounce. I wanted less - the Spin Milled had 4, so I went that route. And my SW, a 54/10, followed.

I noticed the extra two degrees of bounce. I use my lob wedge quite frequently from the sand, but when I open it up as much as I do, I'm back to 8 or 10 degrees of bounce. But yet when it's square, I'm back to 4. I like the versatility. I think having a high-bounce lob wedge robs you of some of that versatility.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

thanks for the replies, I need to just go out and use the club I have before worrying about anything else
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Note: This thread is 6473 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • I didn't disregard it at all. I acknowledged and I am very well aware that the British Open often didn't have the best players (which was still true in the 90s but to a lesser extent), the PGA Championship had a lot of club pros and golf in general was a much less viable profession so the fields were more top heavy. Clemson plays college football in the ACC. The ACC is a much weaker conference than the SEC and Big Ten.  Clemson often had great teams that were discounted because people used the same thinking as you.  Just because the SEC is tougher doesn't imply that every team was better.  This conversation would be more relevant if Jack only had a slightly better major record. The gap between Jack and Tiger in majors records is massive.  Tiger's 50th place finishes and DNPs aren't magically becoming 2nds in the 60s and 70s.
    • Wordle 1,057 4/6 ⬜🟨🟨⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟩🟨🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • For a large chunk of Jack’s early majors, he didn’t even have 10 people with a reasonable chance to win against him. You can’t just disregard that.
    • Tiger was way more dominant. Tiger won more tournaments against deeper fields in a compressed period of times  Anyone who disagrees with that statement is clearly wrong. But does that make Tiger the greatest? To you maybe. Not to those of us who combine dominance with longevity. Travis Kelce and Rob Gronkowski were clearly better tight ends at their peak but the GOAT is Tony Gonzalez. He made 14 Pro Bowls and was All Pro 10 times. Gronk was only 5 and 4 on those stats. Who is the greater point guard Isiah Thomas or John Stockton?  Stockton didn't win any championships but he is third all time in VORP, top 10 in Win Shares and 40th in PER. He was excellent for 19 years. Isiah is around 60th in VORP and outside the top 100 in other advanced metrics.  Jack's total output, particularly in majors, is lightyears beyond Tiger. They aren't close even when you adjust for field strength. Jack has 73 top 10s in majors. Tiger barely has that many total cuts in majors.  If Tiger started his career in 1960, the odds are 0.0000% he would have Jack's overall record in the majors if his career trajectory were the same. Tiger would not get to 50 top 10s in majors let alone 73 based on how his career played out.  You don't have to agree valuing overall output with dominance is the best way to decide. It is subjective. But saying Tiger has the better major record because fields were weaker is clearly wrong. Jack's strokes gained in the majors are so far ahead, that no adjustment for field strength gets Tiger in the ballpark. Jack has 37 top 2s in majors. Tiger barely has that many top 10s.  There were no shortage of guys in the 70s who would be top players in the late 90s, who would have provided plenty of resistance to Tiger. And the simple way to know this is those guys from the 70s were often still relevant playing against Tiger. 
    • Birdied #8 at Quail Brook. Made a casual 50-footer.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...