Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Ruling: Water Hazard vs. Standing Water


Note: This thread is 5724 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Ran into an interesting one during a work scramble on Friday. We've had a lot of rain here and there was a lot of casual water around. Bunkers were flooded and such. The last hole has a natural pond running along the right side. One of the teams hit their ball into the fringe of the water.

Now the lake had flooded higher than normal. Where the ball landed, even though it was fully submerged you could see the grass underneath. So during normal conditions, the ball would have been fully playable and not in the water.

The team ended up declaring "casual water" and too relief without a penalty.

I was curious so I asked the starter what he thought the ruling was. He said they normally have stakes out to designate the hazard but had removed them because of the flooding. He said he could see it either way.

I say it's the same as hitting it into a water hazard. Since you cannot tell where the hazard officially starts, you have to assume that if the ball is in any part of the water, it's in the hazard.

It was a friendly golf outing so I let it slide but was curious what the ruling would be.

Kevin

-------
In the Bag
Driver: G15 9.0*3 & 5 Wood: BurnerHybrid: Pro Gold 20*; 23*Irons: MP-58 (5-PW)Wedges: Vokey Spin Milled 52*8; 56*14Putter: Newport 2.0 33"Balls: NXT


Posted
Ran into an interesting one during a work scramble on Friday. We've had a lot of rain here and there was a lot of casual water around. Bunkers were flooded and such. The last hole has a natural pond running along the right side. One of the teams hit their ball into the fringe of the water.

Without stakes, they made a judgement call based on where they thought the hazard ended. There's often enough grassy area outside the water, but still technically within the hazard, that I couldn't say without pictures.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted

First, I have no idea why They would remove stakes just because the water was a bit high, All that does is make any such rule more confusing. However.... The rules of golf cover this eventuality:

25/2 Overflow from Water Hazard Q. If a pond (water hazard) has overflowed, is the overflow casual water? A. Yes. Any overflow of water from a water hazard which is outside the margin of the hazard is casual water.

Of course, this means that you must be able to identify the margin of the hazard.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Now the lake had flooded higher than normal. Where the ball landed, even though it was fully submerged you could see the grass underneath. So during normal conditions, the ball would have been fully playable and not in the water.

I would have given him the relief based on what you said.


Note: This thread is 5724 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.