Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6777 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Buying clubs from callaway preowned golf, need opinions and info to help decide or what types of things i should look at to help me decide. I am new to golf playing for a few months a few times a months. looking at these clubs wondering differences, similaritys, which one you would pick and why?

Steelhead X-16 3-PW
1. true temper.
2. royal precision rifle.
Big Bertha '04 4-10,W
1. true temper.

three choices the x-16 have a 3 iron but no 10 and come in either true temper or rifle. the bertha only come in true temper, at least thats all thats available right now. I have heard that the berthas are more forgiving but are they that much more forgiving. if they are good for high handicappers like i have read. if/when i get better will they hinder shot making ability that much or will i never really get to that point if i only plan to be a recreational player playing 3 time a month on average. thanks for all your help and opions in advance.

  kamachi923 said:
if/when i get better will they hinder shot making ability that much or will i never really get to that point if i only plan to be a recreational player playing 3 time a month on average. thanks for all your help and opions in advance.

These two clubs are very good choices for a beginner. Certainly the Big Bertha's may make things easier for you in this initial learning period. I would probably get them for this reason and the fact that it would be nice to have the 10 wedge and the fact that you probably won't want to hit a 3 iron in the next few years. (rather hard to hit well) Fact is, you will beat the heck out of whichever clubs you buy for the next couple years, then trade them in for X-16's, or X-18's as you improve.

Either of those shafts are very common and very good. Problem is you need to know which flex to get. Regular or Stiff or X-Stiff. True Tempers are Regular, Stiff, and X-stiff. With Rifle shafts, flex is graduated and numbers are assigned to the varying stiffness. Ie. . . 4.0 is more flexible than 5.0 And 5.0 is more stiff than 4.0 but more flexible than 6.0. If you are younger and stronger, these steel shafts are appropriate. There are graphite shafts out there for irons as well, available for those of us who are not as strong as we once were, or are just slowing down cause of father time or just want a lighter shaft! You may want to head to a golf shop & get on a monitor & just ask the guy to tell you which flex it looks like you need with your swing & then go home & buy that flex in whichever club you choose. Fact is that you will likely buy several sets of irons in the first 5 years or so of your golf life! A very forgiving set will bring the most pleasure while you are learning! Good Luck!

J.P.

Bridgestone J33 10.5* Fujikura Rombax w
Bridgestone J33 15* Fujikura Zcom tw74
Tour Edge XCG 18* 3 hybrid Mizuno MP30 4-PW DG S300Vokey SM 52 bent 51Vokey Spin Milled 56 & 60Cameron Newport BchBridgestone B330s


For a casual player just learning the game, I'd probably lean towards the Berthas for the forgiveness. The difference won't be huge, but ever little bit helps. Do make sure you get your swing clocked so you get the right flex. That's mission critical for buying new clubs.

Titleist 907D1 10.5°
Titleist 906F4 15.5°
Titleist 906F4 18.5°
Wilson Staff Pi5 3-P
Titleist Vokey 56.14Cleveland CG12 60°Scotty Cameron Newport Two


I spent the last 6 years playing Big Berthas and they brought my index from a 26 to 14; the new clubs have done the rest. I can't say anything bad about them other than:

A) They are ugly lookin... Real ugly
B) Clear shot to the pin, the ball goes straight. Need to work the ball around something, the ball goes straight.

One positive that might be overlooked though is resale value. I was given 150.00 in trade for my irons when I bought my new ones. That might not seem like much but lets just say they were more than just "pre-swung". Callaway irons are always worth something because any golfer that's new to the game immediately thinks of them as an option. They've essentially built their company on game improvement clubs.

Their motto isn't, "A better game by improved fundamentals"

It's, "A better game by design"

So yeah, I'd certainly reccomend the Big Berthas, they will get you out there hitting high, straight, irons shots a lot faster than most clubs.

In My Bag:

Taylormade: Superquad 9.5 Aldila VS Proto 'By You' 70-S
Sonartec: SS-07 14.0 Aldila NV 85-S
Cleveland: Halo, 3i UST Irod 83-SPing: i-10 4-UW AWT-STitleist: Vokey Design Spin Milled 54.10 & 60.08Slighter: Handstamped Tacoma, 350G in Black Satin w/Sound Slot

Go to the monitor first, tell them your thinking about getting new irons, tell them which clubs your looking at and they usually will have demo clubs to swing and check you out with something your interrested in buying and you should feel good about any set you buy. any of the clubs you've listed will be good if they fit your eye and swing.

R7 9.5 S Shaft
560 R7 quad R shaft
RAC LT irons
Scotty Cameron Pro Platinum


Note: This thread is 6777 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 197 - 2025-04-15 Played 18 holes at Yeaman's Hall Club.
    • Day 13 (15 Apr 25)- late afternoon session with 6i full swings into the net and short pitches in the yard, before moving to Sw for controlled up and downs.  For kicks broke out the DCI 16° 1 iron and hit a few as into the net.  Definitely different beast. 
    • Day 24: Tax Day Stack Training Session for Full Speed Spectrum. Good session!
    • Very respectfully, I disagree.  I still believe there’s a small kernel of truth to my theory.  Hey, you, iacas and many others here are extremely knowledgeable, know the game inside out, know the tour inside out.  I’m just a schmuck who posted a take, admittedly unsupported and not up to reasonable high standards. There’s a background to my take - I’ll attempt to briefly describe it.  Back when Rory first came on tour, I thought he was great - most folks did, his talent was undeniable, and his youthful happy go lucky looking demeanor made him even more likable.  And he won early, fast - at the highest levels. And then the physical workouts started.  That was cool, man he’s looking good.  And as it went along, was even a bit shocking.  But all was still good in the Rory fan club. But as a few years rolled along and the majors stopped, folks like me started to question the effect of the physical build up.  (raising my hand here - - folks like me were probably concentrating 95% on the majors record, and failing to acknowledge his stellar play overall) The matches with Patrick Reed...  Somewhere around that time, Patrick became “the most hated man on tour”.  Raising my hand again, not sure if that timing is accurate, or even if that moniker was deserved.  But when Rory got into the screaming flex-off, it definitely detracted from the earlier Rory likability.  It’s kinda like he was lowering himself to Patrick’s level.  Not so great, for me at least. As the mid 2010s rolled along, and the majors drought continued, and the near misses at the Masters happened, the dreaded ‘choke’ perception inevitably raised its head and persisted.  I joined in with the chorus, not disliking Rory, but certainly questioning his ability to close the Masters or any other major.  Rightfully or wrongly, it was there. Then LIV came along.  As that developed, I saw the anti-LIV sentiment develop along with it, and I took offense to it.  My thought - these guys are being offered life changing $$, and the anti-LIV folks are trying to stop them from getting it. And then when Rory rose to ‘lead’ the anti-LIV sector, that really rubbed me the wrong way.  The press conferences, the parking lot shouting match - it just all seemed really distasteful to me.  And it seemed far far away from the early Rory, who I really liked. So all that (in my own mind) led me down the “Rory will never win.. yada yada”.  Not based on any real statistical analysis.  Not taking into account the incredible stats and winning record he had amassed. Purely based on perception and cultural silliness.  AND - the physical thing, which as I mentioned, I think there’s a tiny kernel of merit there. So - fast forward to Rory’s post win press conference.  THAT was the old Rory I remembered!  The totally cool guy, humble, forthright, honest, self deprecating.  He’s probably been like that all along.  And he’s certainly backed off the hard core anti-LIV persona, at least in public. That’s it.  Just a stupid unsupported take from a dumbsh*t golf fan.  For me, this was the most exciting major since the Tiger era. I really thought it would be a gladiator death match between Rory and Bryson.  I’m surprised that Bryson fell off - - I thought he was well-set-up to handle the pressure.  I’m sure he’ll be there many times in the future, along with Rory.
    • I've been watching golf for 35 years and I've seen my fair share of exciting events, but I cannot recall ever watching so much up and down in the fortunes of one player in one round of golf. How good the good shots were and how bad the bad shots were and how he was leading, then not, then leading again, then way clear, then tied, then behind, then leading, then in a playoff, then winning. Heck I aged just watching it on the TV - Rory must have gone through some stuff out there. Just incredible. Consider that Rory had two double bogeys, three bogeys, six birdies, and Rose made only 4 pars, 4 bogeys, and 10 birdies. 10! Round that place? Mind officially blown.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...